Zonie63
Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011 From: The Old Pueblo Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl ~FR http://open.salon.com/blog/sagemerlin/2012/08/23/whats_race_baiting_and_whats_not From the article: quote:
Joe Biden has been accused of explicit race-baiting on the basis of his speech in Danville, Virginia Biden said: "He (Romney) is going to let the big banks once again write their own rules, unchain Wall Street. He is going to put y'all back in chains." The Republican party has jumped all over Biden, claiming foul....but is this really "explicit race baiting?" It reminded me of something similar that happened a while back. quote:
Speaking to the civil-rights group, Perot recounted his family's ties to blacks in Texarkana, Texas, recited his hope to make the nation's "melting-pot" diversity a strength, and offered his standard anti-crime, clean-up-the-economy speech. "Financially at least, it's going to be a long, hot summer," Perot told the group. "Now I don't have to tell you who gets hurt first when this sort of thing happens, do I? "You people do, your people do. I know that, you know that," Someone in the audience yelled at Perot to protest the "you people" term, but Perot didn't hear. Two men yelled again, one saying "Correct it!," and Perot, appearing again to not hear, said simply, "Thank you, sir." He went on, and later repeated the term. Applause from the audience was sporadic and polite, and NAACP executive director Benjamin Hooks said he saw people cringe at some of Perot's wording. Other officials from the organization, which traditionally leans toward Democratic candidates, said Perot was simply naive. " `You people' is not a term you use to an African-American audience," said Lacy Steele, an NAACP national board member from Bellevue, Wash. "The term `you people' shows he is not sensitive to African Americans. People in the audience were beginning to get very frustrated." In terms of actual content, there's very little difference between "Y'all" and "you people," yet one is offensive race-baiting, while the other is not. Maybe that's part of the problem, since there's no consistency, coherency, or logic in determining what is supposedly offensive and what is not. Is there some committee somewhere that decides all this stuff?
|