Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: atheists represent


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: atheists represent Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: atheists represent - 7/22/2013 6:50:35 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: graceadieu
quote:

ORIGINAL: FrostedFlake

I just have a hard time with the idea that god wants to be worshiped.


Or care a whole lot about somebody's sex life...

Some people believe that something greater exists on the basis of their personal experience, something for which the word "God" serves as a placeholder not a definition. Other people believe in a book. They can tell you exactly what God wants, and exactly what God hates, because it's right there in the book. "He said so."

It has always seemed rather odd to me that the latter are the ones we call "religious".

K.

(in reply to graceadieu)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: atheists represent - 7/22/2013 7:36:13 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

JeffBC
As far as I'm concerned the jury is out on the existence of "god"


Yup. It's been out for a few thousand years now. Sadly that doesn't seem to have stopped many people from claiming otherwise.

I don't believe that the question of whether there's a deity or not is answerable definitively (at least not on a rational basis).



_____________________________



(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: atheists represent - 7/22/2013 9:36:37 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

there is a specific order.

is a dream a "conscious" process?

Please clarify "specific order" and define "conscious" and we can talk.


a fleeting dream in and of itself is not part of the process of a choice until it has been fashioned into a belief, and by order, it is impossible to draw a conclusion or inference before having an object to conclude or infer, and conscious is awareness.


As I sort it the process of choice and belief is so dependent on past emotional experiences it is difficult to support the notion of free rational choice or volition. We believe what we believe because of who we are.

well yeh everyone has their own unique perspective on everything based on their life experience real or imagined. What/who someone believes or worships is not knowable to anyone until it manifests itself externally by its appearance, this process forms the basis for all action by what you know as free will. Sorted out beliefs form the will, the will motivates one to act, the actions and external appearance of the will is their religion. It is the substantial definition of religion, anything less would arbitrarily deny thought,

Hence everything in the mind is a composite of beliefs regardless if that belief result in positive or negative conclusions. An atheist for instance "believes" god does not exist as that is a result of a sorting process accomplished by the brain.


Is the brain conscious during a fleeting dream? I am guessing here. I have not read research on it. If you have please link it. It seems to me the brain always has its own internal dialogue and internal awareness which practioners of meditation attempt to extinguish. I sometimes think I am conscious of time ticking on the digital face of my bedside clock when I am asleep. Not sure however. There may be some awareness of the external environment while asleep. There have been cases of patients aware of pain while under anaethesia during surgery. So, don't rightly know the answer to this question.

well dreaming is a different twist to what I was talking about yes. however if you are aware and consciously "sorting" things out and the results of that sorting results in a position on any matter such that it affects your personal constitution then it is a belief and acting up on it is the exercise of your religion regardless of how those convictions were constructed.

Anything one does as a reflex action such as jerking back from a pin prick or breathing purely instinctual and not within the sorting out process one would use for selecting believes or a choose in religious action


As for belief or not in an absent god which cannot be inferred or concluded due to the absence . . . . the concept of god is well present in the communal mind. To say god is absent and therefore beyond disbelief is a logical error. Did I misunderstand your premise? Not only would atheism be impossible. so, would religious belief. I hope I haven't misrepresented your position.

quote:

actually its pretty intuitive, a physical god can neither proved nor disproved. However how the process of how we think is something better understood.

A persons god and religion is the result of process, a set of beliefs often resulting volition, then acting in accord with those beliefs forms ones "religion". Belief in a deity is irrelevant. That is the essence or substantial definition.

Oops, should have read this first before I answered above. I think we are saying pretty much the same thing.



Belief and religion do not have to be centered around a diety. It can create a deity, (the worship of false gods)

the point here is that you worship whatever is your core.

you can worship anything in complete secrecy, however you cannot exercise your religion (the actions resulting from your beliefs) in secrecy hence the distinction between worship and exercising religion.

That is my point, like most everything else in this country, you have a fucking piece of paper that says a lot of shit that is nothing more then a lot of shit because you have NO right what so ever to "EXERCISE" your religion in this country.

anyway this is generic and do not have time to insure every word is perfectly stated, but from my previous posts people should be able to put it together to get the point.

we live in a orwellian cognitively dissonant society. Just because it says so on a piece of fucking paper people think its actually real. Some serious kind of fucked up imo.



_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: atheists represent - 7/22/2013 11:46:54 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

the point here is that you worship whatever is your core.

On this we agree.

quote:

you can worship anything in complete secrecy, however you cannot exercise your religion (the actions resulting from your beliefs) in secrecy hence the distinction between worship and exercising religion.

Seems a distinction without a difference. Anyone can perform a ritual in privacy. He would only NEED to exercise his worship in public if he thought his god could not see nor hear through the walls of his home.

quote:

That is my point, like most everything else in this country, you have a fucking piece of paper that says a lot of shit that is nothing more then a lot of shit because you have NO right what so ever to "EXERCISE" your religion in this country.

Well, sure you do. With certain restrictions. You can pray anywhere. Even in public school if you are not disrupting the learning environment or trying to organize others in prayer during classroom hours.

And, oh yes, no sacrificing virgins allowed. Ot even animals for that matter.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: atheists represent - 7/22/2013 4:12:39 PM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
Well, there wouldn't be a book if it wasn't God's will, right?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kr1I3mBojc0

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: graceadieu
quote:

ORIGINAL: FrostedFlake

I just have a hard time with the idea that god wants to be worshiped.


Or care a whole lot about somebody's sex life...

Some people believe that something greater exists on the basis of their personal experience, something for which the word "God" serves as a placeholder not a definition. Other people believe in a book. They can tell you exactly what God wants, and exactly what God hates, because it's right there in the book. "He said so."

It has always seemed rather odd to me that the latter are the ones we call "religious".

K.




_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: atheists represent - 7/24/2013 5:56:56 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

the point here is that you worship whatever is your core.

On this we agree.

quote:

you can worship anything in complete secrecy, however you cannot exercise your religion (the actions resulting from your beliefs) in secrecy hence the distinction between worship and exercising religion.

Seems a distinction without a difference. Anyone can perform a ritual in privacy. He would only NEED to exercise his worship in public if he thought his god could not see nor hear through the walls of his home.

quote:

That is my point, like most everything else in this country, you have a fucking piece of paper that says a lot of shit that is nothing more then a lot of shit because you have NO right what so ever to "EXERCISE" your religion in this country.

Well, sure you do. With certain restrictions. You can pray anywhere. Even in public school if you are not disrupting the learning environment or trying to organize others in prayer during classroom hours.

And, oh yes, no sacrificing virgins allowed. Ot even animals for that matter.


no you cannot worship "anything" in secrecy, however it can be as little as a thought, silence or some other form of homage or adoration to [insert a God here].

"your" distinction is without difference, however that does NOT make "it" a distinction without a difference.

exercise is the action taken on behalf of the composite results of your beliefs while adoration is the homage paid to the source and core of your beliefs.

exercising your religion can be seen by the world outside, worship may or may not be seen by anyone.

two entirely different things as you can see.

yes as horrendous as that might sound if some ancient tribe were to move into the house next door to you and wanted to exercise their religion by sacrificing a virgin who also practices their religion that is the same religion that is precisely what exercising your religion is.

Now if they tried to sacrifice some virgin not of their religion that would be completely different. The government was "intended" to protect everyones religion not create one of their own, the red white and blue dick they up our asses.

Those rights are precisely what the government was created to protect and have failed miserably as can be seen by the states counties and municipalities that in their charters have stolen our rights such that we have none that have not already been claimed by their corporations.

There is no protection for culture and rather than have a colorful society we have one shoe fits all government culture worshiping the government god as it has become.

Shall I presume you are aware the definitions and meanings of the words we are using here?

< Message edited by Real0ne -- 7/24/2013 6:05:46 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: atheists represent - 7/24/2013 6:21:35 PM   
Dyfrynt


Posts: 202
Joined: 4/19/2011
Status: offline
RealOne, you are playing with words. You are first self defining them, then justifying your premises based upon your own self definitions. For example:

exercising your religion can be seen by the world outside, worship may or may not be seen by anyone.
two entirely different things as you can see
.

No, I cannot see at all. Exercising your religion may or may not be seen by anyone, just like worship can be seen by the real world outside. Turned around it makes as little sense as your original.

Bottom line, I for one, don't have a clue what definitions and meanings of the words you are using here. Except to say that they are self determined by you.

Answering the OP. I am agnostic for a reason I rarely hear anyone else use. I'm agnostic because I really don't give a shit whether there is a god or not.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: atheists represent - 7/24/2013 7:53:40 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
No, have no reason to "play" with words, in fact I always sort and separate the play from the substance.

Like the words exterminate was completely improperly used to demonize certain people when its meaning was not even close to how used today thanks to some crap movies that created the image in peoples heads. I digress.

Anyway if you want to know the meaning of anything you need to get the meaning of its use in that period of history that it either came into existence or its origin and first applications forward to the usage during the dates of the documents you want to understand.

You will find that many words that have great importance magically morphed into something other than their original meaning, and because people were brought up to "think" everything is one huge pot of stew with the same meanings nothing could be farther from the truth.

anyway







which is why you hear people complain about someone "worshiping money" for instance, a false god, likewise power.


can you see now?




< Message edited by Real0ne -- 7/24/2013 8:47:58 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Dyfrynt)
Profile   Post #: 48
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: atheists represent Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.080