Edwynn
Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: defiantbadgirl According to Boehner, Congress should be judged on number of repeals Boehner: judge Congress on 'how many laws we repeal, not on how many we pass' Government Topics July 21, 2013 By: Bruce Maiman For those judging the House for its failure to pass new laws and its dogged determination to repeal existing ones (hello, ObamaCare!), John Boehner would like you to do, well, pretty much just that. In comments on "Face the Nation" Sunday morning, the House speaker said Congress "ought to be judged on how many laws we repeal" and not "by how many new laws we create." And, since they have done a terrible job of repealing laws, which is the measure that Boehner thinks most important, exactly what have they done? What laws have they repealed? By that metric, they're an even bigger failure. What an IDIOT! http://www.examiner.com/article/boehner-judged-congress-on-how-many-laws-we-repeal-not-on-how-many-we-pass Well, I don't know how to break this to you, fellow earth and space traveler, but I'm at least half in agreement with Boehner on this one, even if it's to purpose completely opposite if his intention. If Congress would repeal the so-called "Banking Modernization Act" of 1999, and the "Commodity Futures Modernization Act" of 2000, which both set financial regulation back to where it was 75 years previous (hence the term "modernization," for cruel irony's sake), the world would indisputably be in a better situation now. I've got a Nevada highway's-length list of things I'd like repealed. Did Boehner mention that he'd like all those laws giving tax breaks to the wealthiest repealed? Yeah, I thought not. Just another ankle grabber, barking from the gutter.
< Message edited by Edwynn -- 7/22/2013 10:20:55 PM >
|