RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way?

RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

pahunkboy -> RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (7/29/2013 7:33:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: OvrThRainbow quote: I dont have time to educate you. I've read many of your posts in the past and this response just made me laugh out loud. I'll step back, pumpkin. Don't want to tax that brain of yours. [:D] Actually heredity can play a role in your teeth. I dated a girl whose teeth rotted out from the inside out. There was nothing she could do to stop it and it ran in her family. Thank you. Some people do experience this.

littlewonder -> RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (7/29/2013 7:42:38 PM)
Op, duuude.....get some therapy.

MasterCaneman -> RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (7/29/2013 9:09:18 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OsideGirl quote: ORIGINAL: TNDommeK quote: ORIGINAL: MistressDarkArt And OP, the plural of penis is penises. Lose the apostrophe. So it's not peni...pronounced pee neye lol I use penii, but penises is correct. Technically, both are correct. And it's a curse of men descended from the northern tribes of man. There's a reason the Nordic dudes don't have large Johnsons, and it's partly hereditary and partly environmental. When you live in a region with routine sub-zero temperatures, oversized body parts have an annoying tendency to contract frostbite and gangrene. Thus, successful survivors have a tendency to have smaller penises because they're easier to keep warm and thus intact over the cold northern winters. Simply put, the guys with the big schlongs had 'em freeze off and never successfully bred, and the dudes with the wee willies did, simply because it was easier for their bodies to supply them with blood and thus heat.

Spiritedsub2 -> RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (7/29/2013 10:00:24 PM)
Are you pulling the collective Johnson with that story?!

MasterCaneman -> RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (7/29/2013 10:31:22 PM)
No, however I cannot seem to find the pertinent link that explains it. I admit, it was a long time ago that it came up (in a student's essay, of all things), but there was a competent body of study behind the reasoning behind it, primarily focusing on its tertiary role as a heat exchanger (owing to its large amount of blood vessels). Now all I can find is psuedo-racist black supremacy writings justifying it.

metamorfosis -> RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (7/29/2013 10:42:02 PM)
There seems a curious disconnect between the consensus on this thread, which can be summed up as, "Don't involve other people in your kinks without their consent." and this argument: quote: I really didn't think I was pushing anything 'in peoples faces' by posting on a specialist website like this one, where people only join the thread by choice. versus the consensus on this thread...(Why BDSM isn't Abuse) www.collarchat.com/m_4331233/mpage_1/tm.htm ...which can be summed up as, "By entering, you have implicitly given your consent to being exposed to other people's kinks, and if you have any problem with that you bear the responsibility to ignore, report, block, or just leave." and the OP's argument that people in videochat should not impose their kink (specifically humiliation) on everyone without regard for consent. Any thoughts as to why there is such a difference?

metamorfosis -> RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (7/29/2013 10:54:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OvrThRainbow Don't go away mad, sugar. No one is angry. Feel free to post whatever your little heart desires. But, be prepared to get all kinds of responses. No, just condescending.

metamorfosis -> RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (7/29/2013 11:11:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: cloudboy Most of the respondents are in denial about penis size and it's importance. If it was not important, there wouldn't be a whole industry devoted to penis enlargement. The gender flip side of this equation is flat chested women. Although you don't see women posting about their cup size or wanting to be humiliated, the industry of breast implants is huge -- and the inadequacy women feel must be considerable to go under the knife and take corrective action. It's odd that women would not be more sensitive to men who don't fit the masculine ideal, because women suffer greatly from societal stereotypes of beauty. Firstly, I think that men identify their masculinity with their penises much more strongly than women identify their femininity with their breasts. There seem to be any number of physical traits that contribute to a woman's femininity. It's hard to think of many that contribute to a man's masculinity besides penis size and height. Secondly, I think women's lib made it more acceptable for women to be perceived as "unfeminine". It's simply not as acceptable for a man to be perceived as "unmasculine". Which is why you don't have female subs pleading for some Dom to "machoify" them.

metamorfosis -> RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (7/29/2013 11:16:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: cloudboy Most of the respondents are in denial about penis size and it's importance. If it was not important, there wouldn't be a whole industry devoted to penis enlargement. Out of curiosity, importance to who? Do you think penis size is more important to men or to women? Do you think breast size is more important to men or to women? Do you think that a person's perception of their own masculinity or femininity is a major factor in their self esteem? Which gender is worse off for society's pressure to conform to the norm for that gender?

metamorfosis -> RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (7/29/2013 11:28:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Rawni Not only is your view of yourself tainted, but your view of women is as well. You may belittle yourself, but when you start implying that women are small minded about cocks, I'm going to call you on that. We like big brains and a mans cock has nothing to do with it unless he loses brain cells to his cock. Ahem. We like big cocks too. Just saying.

theshytype -> RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (7/29/2013 11:42:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: metamorfosis quote: ORIGINAL: Rawni Not only is your view of yourself tainted, but your view of women is as well. You may belittle yourself, but when you start implying that women are small minded about cocks, I'm going to call you on that. We like big brains and a mans cock has nothing to do with it unless he loses brain cells to his cock. Ahem. We like big cocks too. Just saying. I'm going to be honest here. I want it all - big brains, big cock, large amount of confidence. I'm greedy like that. Some men like big breasts. Some women like big cocks. Some men have body issues. Some women have body issues. Some use what they have and do just fine in life.

stef -> RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (7/30/2013 12:34:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: metamorfosis Ahem. We like big cocks too. Just saying. It's the dicks they're usually attached to that most people have a problem with.

MistressDarkArt -> RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (7/30/2013 12:35:00 AM)
I know the questions weren't aimed at me, but I'd like to answer. quote: ORIGINAL: metamorfosis Do you think penis size is more important to men or to women? Men. Generally. quote: Do you think breast size is more important to men or to women? Men. Generally. quote: Which gender is worse off for society's pressure to conform to the norm for that gender? Men. Generally. Poor dudes.

MistressDarkArt -> RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (7/30/2013 12:38:57 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: stef quote: ORIGINAL: metamorfosis Ahem. We like big cocks too. Just saying. It's the dicks they're usually attached to that most people have a problem with. And you did it again, Stef. Major belly laugh. Reminds me of the joke: A man came home to find his middle-aged wife admiring herself stark-naked in the mirror. "My doctor says I have the breasts of a 20 year old," she cooed. "What did he say about your 50 year old ass?" he sneered. "Funny, he didn't mention you," she replied.

LadyPact -> RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (7/30/2013 1:07:01 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: cloudboy You guys mugged the OP pure and simple. He's been a very good fellow about it, too, despite his lack of refinement and posting experience here. If his name were "thehandofgod" and he asked about milling paddles or something -- even if is interest in spanking were graphic and over the top -- we wouldn't see the same response. BTW, he's not a victim. You guys are the aggressors. That's a big difference. Flying in formation, you just don't see it. We've had a number of threads regarding screen names when they are directly related go kink. I have every reason to believe that they are not popular from the threads we have had on the subject on the Ask A Mistress board. A kink related or dick centric screen name is often seen as a person leading with their kink or that they are a one trick pony. I can't say if submissive women feel the same way because I haven't read as many threads on that topic (screen names) on the Ask A Submissive board. If a person came to the forums to ask about milling paddles or another question of that nature, I don't think that's an attempt to coerce. If a person came on and asked for reviews of the thoughts of the author administering said paddling looking for hot talk, that's a different thing.

Termyn8or -> RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (7/30/2013 1:08:54 AM)
FR If they get that smallcocks as a kid, will they be susceptible to get shingles later in life ? T^T ETA : Hick content

LadyPact -> RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (7/30/2013 1:18:06 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: metamorfosis There seems a curious disconnect between the consensus on this thread, which can be summed up as, "Don't involve other people in your kinks without their consent." and this argument: quote: I really didn't think I was pushing anything 'in peoples faces' by posting on a specialist website like this one, where people only join the thread by choice. versus the consensus on this thread...(Why BDSM isn't Abuse) www.collarchat.com/m_4331233/mpage_1/tm.htm ...which can be summed up as, "By entering, you have implicitly given your consent to being exposed to other people's kinks, and if you have any problem with that you bear the responsibility to ignore, report, block, or just leave." and the OP's argument that people in videochat should not impose their kink (specifically humiliation) on everyone without regard for consent. Any thoughts as to why there is such a difference? Might be linked to exactly what Chi said was the reason this went to Off Topic. This post makes Me think that it's a "the submissive is always right" issue. When it was a submissive who said they didn't want to be drawn into other people's kink, which I didn't think was really displayed in the evidence on a thread, that should be correct. (Considering the OP's behavior on that thread, I have serious doubts about that being the way it went down.) Yet, when a submissive starts a thread that darn near every Domme on the thread thought was fishing for wank fodder, that should be ok, too, because it's a submissive doing it.

metamorfosis -> RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (7/30/2013 1:41:14 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact Might be linked to exactly what Chi said was the reason this went to Off Topic. This post makes Me think that it's a "the submissive is always right" issue. When it was a submissive who said they didn't want to be drawn into other people's kink, which I didn't think was really displayed in the evidence on a thread, that should be correct. (Considering the OP's behavior on that thread, I have serious doubts about that being the way it went down.) Yet, when a submissive starts a thread that darn near every Domme on the thread thought was fishing for wank fodder, that should be ok, too, because it's a submissive doing it. No, I haven't suggested either way is correct, I just remarked that the two arguments seemed to contradict each other. Actually, I was just digging around for something to talk about on a thread that seemed, well, void of any intellectual merit.

metamorfosis -> RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (7/30/2013 1:47:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: cloudboy You guys mugged the OP pure and simple. No, in this case the OP got what was coming to him. But since the thread is still going, does anyone want to try to salvage this into an actual discussion?

metamorfosis -> RE: Are men with small cocks inferior to women and other men in every way? (7/30/2013 1:51:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MistressDarkArt I know the questions weren't aimed at me, but I'd like to answer. quote: ORIGINAL: metamorfosis Do you think penis size is more important to men or to women? Men. Generally. quote: Do you think breast size is more important to men or to women? Men. Generally. quote: Which gender is worse off for society's pressure to conform to the norm for that gender? Men. Generally. Poor dudes. Agreed X3. It's too bad there hasn't been an equivalent to women's lib for men.

Page: << < prev 2 3 [4] 5 6 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875