FrostedFlake
Posts: 3084
Joined: 3/4/2009 From: Centralia, Washington Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: pahunkboy Feedback may be submitted via email to [email protected]. Information about the first proposal, “Using the Chained Consumer Price Index to Determine Social Security Cost-of-Living Adjustments and Benefit Increases for Long-Time Social Security Beneficiaries, Thanks, P.A. Did and done. quote:
“Using the Chained Consumer Price Index to Determine Social Security Cost-of-Living Adjustments and Benefit Increases for Long-Time Social Security Beneficiaries,” The choice is between starving the poor, or popping the cap and means testing. What makes (slowly) starving people a socially acceptable means to achieve our collective Social Security? What is it about expecting the rich to contribute the SAME PERCENTAGE to our Social Security the poor have to that makes the idea a non-starter? Was Social Security really invented to pay those who already collect over $100,000, as 7.2% of current beneficiaries do? Does paying those who have more, MORE, sound like a good way to alleviate poverty? Wasn't alleviating poverty the goal of the program, to begin with? When did this change? Thank you for considering my view. Kurtis
_____________________________
Frosted Flake simul justus et peccator Einen Liebhaber, und halten Sie die Schraube "... evil (and hilarious) !!" Hlen5
|