farglebargle -> RE: End of discussion. "Fetal Pain Is A Lie..." (8/8/2013 9:46:21 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: farglebargle quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: farglebargle What does any of this have to do with the assertion that -- without the required structures at that phase of development -- it is literally impossible for the fetus to EXPERIENCE PAIN. These references aren't talking about fetuses, and I do not believe extrapolating from DEVELOPED, VIABLE ACTUALLY BORN PEOPLE to DEVELOPING FETUSES isn't warranted. In other words, a 17 year old isn't a fetus. Is it intellectually honest to assert that they are similar enough for the results to be relevant? I don't think so. The references demonstrate that a cerebral cortex is not necessary for a human to feel pain. That would be true for a 17 year old, and would be true for a developing fetus in the womb. Basing the ability for a fetus to feel pain on the development of the cerebral cortex isn't accurate. That is what those links all demonstrate. You have a point. You need to actual TEST A FETUS' ABILITY TO EXPERIENCE PAIN before asserting that it can. Please provide links to the peer reviewed studies where they tested a FETUS' ABILITY TO EXPERIENCE PAIN. As opposed to a reflex. I await your respons. **Yawn** What a lame argument. Do you not see the inherent flaw in your argument? Basing the ability to feel pain on the presence of he cerebral cortex (and having the connections to it) is wrong. Flat out. K's links show that. Don't you understand that I'm not talking about extrapolating. I'm talking about DIRECT EXPERIMENTS. Where you expose a fetus to stimuli and you determine SCIENTIFICALLY if they have in face EXPERIENCED PAIN rather than display a reflex. So, I continue to await your enumeration of these direct studies.
|
|
|
|