Zonie63
Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011 From: The Old Pueblo Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Level Some believe, that non whites can't be racist, because they don't have the power to impose their will on another race. They will admit to being bigoted, though. Semantics? I would agree that there's some semantics and wordsmithing taking place. If racism necessarily entails having the power to impose one's will on another race, then that's at the level of government and public policy, not the average person who wouldn't have such power. Maybe there's two types of racism at work here. There's official policy and government level racism, and then there's street-level racism which might take place between ordinary citizens of different races. It's not just "white vs. black," but every race vs. every other race. Blacks vs. Hispanics, Asians vs. Hispanics, Asians vs. Blacks, Hispanics vs. Anglos, etc. Individual nationalities may also go at each other. If two white nationalities hate each other, then is that called "racism" or what? Nationalism? Bigotry? Prejudice? Are these any different from racism? Is it considered less immoral to be bigoted than racist, and if so, why? What about conflicts between religions? Religion is not the same as race, but still, it's the same idea of wanting to impose one's will (even to the point of violence or murder) on someone just because of who and what they are. Over the course of my lifetime, I've found discussions about race relations to be lacking in rationality or any objective reasoning. It's too emotionally charged at both ends of the spectrum. The voices of reason tend to get drowned out. It doesn't mean that they don't exist, but they just don't seem to be very prominent in the discussion.
|