Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion - 8/28/2013 5:13:36 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

The American Constitution uses the line about holding its moral truths to be self-evident, in and of themselves, without anything "higher" validating that - but its writers knew that this wouldn't be enough for some people. Or, at least, that's my impression.

I believe you are confusing the Constitution with the Declaration of Independence where those words will be found.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion - 8/28/2013 5:28:01 PM   
WebWanderer


Posts: 255
Joined: 5/20/2011
From: Fort Worth, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24

I said based on GOD not religion. There is a huge difference. If you read the constitution there are some key words through out the document that might give you a clue. I see them do you?

Ahh, yes, the good ol' Da Vinci Code argument. Never mind the fact that the Founders described their stand on almost every issue in excruciating detail in the Federalist Papers and didn't write anything along the lines of "and this new country will be Jesus-land!" Never mind the fact that the two times the Constitution mentions religion, it's to ensure there is no religious test for government employees and that people are free to worship as they wish. Never mind that none of the Founders who went on to become presidents attempted to institute theocracy or any sort of religious rule.

No - forget all that. There are clues, don't you see? The Founders were so goddamn devious that they hid a ton of teeny tiny clues all over the place, and only the greatest minds of our generation, of whom the unsung genius chatterbox24 is one, have managed to figure it out. I bow to your wisdom, oh great and mighty chatterbox24! Please tell this ignorant serf what other groundbreaking clues were hidden in our nation's founding documents.



_____________________________

Author of Introduction to Self-Bondage and Nine Tales of Submission - now available on Kindle! :)

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion - 8/28/2013 6:03:03 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

The American Constitution uses the line about holding its moral truths to be self-evident, in and of themselves, without anything "higher" validating that - but its writers knew that this wouldn't be enough for some people. Or, at least, that's my impression.

I believe you are confusing the Constitution with the Declaration of Independence where those words will be found.


Damnit, you could be right. Bah! Can't you Americans amalgamate the whole lot?

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion - 8/28/2013 6:07:40 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Can't you Americans amalgamate the whole lot?

At least we took the time to write our Constitution down.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion - 8/28/2013 6:47:46 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
and obviously people STILL get it wrong!!!!!
grins

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion - 8/29/2013 1:00:45 PM   
chatterbox24


Posts: 2182
Joined: 1/22/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WebWanderer

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24

I said based on GOD not religion. There is a huge difference. If you read the constitution there are some key words through out the document that might give you a clue. I see them do you?

Ahh, yes, the good ol' Da Vinci Code argument. Never mind the fact that the Founders described their stand on almost every issue in excruciating detail in the Federalist Papers and didn't write anything along the lines of "and this new country will be Jesus-land!" Never mind the fact that the two times the Constitution mentions religion, it's to ensure there is no religious test for government employees and that people are free to worship as they wish. Never mind that none of the Founders who went on to become presidents attempted to institute theocracy or any sort of religious rule.

No - forget all that. There are clues, don't you see? The Founders were so goddamn devious that they hid a ton of teeny tiny clues all over the place, and only the greatest minds of our generation, of whom the unsung genius chatterbox24 is one, have managed to figure it out. I bow to your wisdom, oh great and mighty chatterbox24! Please tell this ignorant serf what other groundbreaking clues were hidden in our nation's founding documents.




Oh I missed this. No need to take offense, I take none. I am afraid dear, I have no ground breaking clues, they remain airborne.

signed The GREAT AND POWER OZ-NOT

_____________________________

I am like a box of chocolates, you never know what variety you are going to get on any given day.

My crazy smells like jasmine, cloves and cat nip.

(in reply to WebWanderer)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion - 8/29/2013 1:34:50 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
IF...if the constitution is based, whatever that means, on anything it is on old English common law with the added attenuation of power of govt. designed to protect the people...from it.

The clarion attempt at its most specific design, was of a government at the consent of the governed as a democratic republic.

In fact if anything our constitution was a specific attempt at forming govt. without the influences of the church...or ANY God. So not only are such proclamations and assumptions false, they are the opposite of the result.

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion - 8/29/2013 2:02:39 PM   
chatterbox24


Posts: 2182
Joined: 1/22/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

IF...if the constitution is based, whatever that means, on anything it is on old English common law with the added attenuation of power of govt. designed to protect the people...from it.

The clarion attempt at its most specific design, was of a government at the consent of the governed as a democratic republic.

In fact if anything our constitution was a specific attempt at forming govt. without the influences of the church...or ANY God. So not only are such proclamations and assumptions false, they are the opposite of the result.


Okay. It was attempted,, the specific attempt to base it on common law........it has been attempted to also have moral just people in house...it was attempted with perfection...it has been attempted....

I attempted to do a back bend today, and guess what it didn't happen. Maybe I should exercise? Attempt it. strive for it. perfect it. Can you see me do a backbend? Of course not, but does it mean it wasn't real.

...Don't see God.....no matter.....its an opinion...my own thought... my own connection that I put lots of time into with study. I live in Jesus land and IM very proud of it.
Lets see how well men do with their own will and actions. lets see how equal it becomes. I hope it turns out well.

_____________________________

I am like a box of chocolates, you never know what variety you are going to get on any given day.

My crazy smells like jasmine, cloves and cat nip.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion - 8/29/2013 2:09:03 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Your Opinion is factually wrong... does that not tell you something?

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion - 8/29/2013 2:11:00 PM   
JeffBC


Posts: 5799
Joined: 2/12/2012
From: Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
Lets see how well men do with their own will and actions. lets see how equal it becomes. I hope it turns out well.

Uh... OK. Let's just stop and define terms for a minute. If we were actually talking about Jesus for President I'd be inclined to vote for him. I'm pretty cool with most of what he said. But it wouldn't be Jesus now, would it? It'd be some asshat claiming to speak in his name.

Now... if we take a look at pretty much all of human history you can already see how well that turns out. There's no need to speculate. When you give a human the authority of God that turns out very, very poorly. People tend to die in droves. Mass suffering occurs. Human oppression takes on the absolute dimensions of divine authority. No thanks... not now... not ever.

_____________________________

I'm a lover of "what is", not because I'm a spiritual person, but because it hurts when I argue with reality. -- Bryon Katie
"You're humbly arrogant" -- sunshinemiss
officially a member of the K Crowd

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion - 8/29/2013 2:15:48 PM   
chatterbox24


Posts: 2182
Joined: 1/22/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Your Opinion is factually wrong... does that not tell you something?


I know you were not standing there when it was signed, nor was I. That tells me something.

If you want me to be wrong, I can be. Ok I say based on what you read, I am factually wrong. Now everyone who is offended by my apparent ignorance can be happy. I am fine with that.



_____________________________

I am like a box of chocolates, you never know what variety you are going to get on any given day.

My crazy smells like jasmine, cloves and cat nip.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion - 8/29/2013 2:18:36 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24


I am factually wrong. Now everyone who is offended by my apparent ignorance can be happy. I am fine with that.



I am never offended by ignorance. I actively work to cure it. That is why I was a teacher.


I only get offended when the ignorance becomes willful. At that point, it is no longer ignorance. It becomes something else.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion - 8/29/2013 2:21:44 PM   
chatterbox24


Posts: 2182
Joined: 1/22/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
Lets see how well men do with their own will and actions. lets see how equal it becomes. I hope it turns out well.

Uh... OK. Let's just stop and define terms for a minute. If we were actually talking about Jesus for President I'd be inclined to vote for him. I'm pretty cool with most of what he said. But it wouldn't be Jesus now, would it? It'd be some asshat claiming to speak in his name.

Now... if we take a look at pretty much all of human history you can already see how well that turns out. There's no need to speculate. When you give a human the authority of God that turns out very, very poorly. People tend to die in droves. Mass suffering occurs. Human oppression takes on the absolute dimensions of divine authority. No thanks... not now... not ever.


THat does happen a lot, people of power whether religious or not can take on " I AM GOD" goes straight to their head.
That's not what I am talking about at all.
I like your post though, thanks.

_____________________________

I am like a box of chocolates, you never know what variety you are going to get on any given day.

My crazy smells like jasmine, cloves and cat nip.

(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion - 8/29/2013 2:30:49 PM   
JeffBC


Posts: 5799
Joined: 2/12/2012
From: Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
That's not what I am talking about at all.
I like your post though, thanks.

Your welcome :)

But it IS what you are talking about if you think about it. If we agree that the US is founded on christian principles we have a problem because Christ isn't around to tell us what those principles are. That leaves us back at "some asshat speaking in his name". How soon before I'm being stoned because I'm right now wearing a cotton/poly blend? You know that is a death offense in old testament right? I'm sure you're also aware that most of our christian politicians cannot distinguish the words of Christ from those who came before.

And yes, while people in power tend to be evil bastards things take on a whole new dimension when they ACTUALLY get the stamp of approval right from God himself. At that point, they may do ANYTHING (Spanish Inquisition anyone? Crusades? Pedophilia in the catholic church? etc.) So yeah, power tends to corrupt. But absolute power should never be in anyone's hands and if it must be, then it should not be given to anyone who wants it.

_____________________________

I'm a lover of "what is", not because I'm a spiritual person, but because it hurts when I argue with reality. -- Bryon Katie
"You're humbly arrogant" -- sunshinemiss
officially a member of the K Crowd

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion - 8/29/2013 2:52:11 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Your Opinion is factually wrong... does that not tell you something?


I know you were not standing there when it was signed, nor was I. That tells me something.

If you want me to be wrong, I can be. Ok I say based on what you read, I am factually wrong. Now everyone who is offended by my apparent ignorance can be happy. I am fine with that.



what does it telll us? apart from the fact that we are relying on actual peoples account *which can of course be wrong too* There is rather more factual evidence in play than belief and faith.
Neither do we actually have the words of the God person, no matter which god you believe in, you have a person or people "translating" what they heard or believe.(generic you, not personal)
I dont want you to be wrong, you can blieve what you want, you are entitled to that, however you are not entitled to your own facts, without being asked to back up your "facts"
That you admitted it, is great. Many here cant and will not do that, so kudos to you

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion - 8/29/2013 3:00:46 PM   
JeffBC


Posts: 5799
Joined: 2/12/2012
From: Canada
Status: offline
~fast reply~

But.. uh... as I was pondering this it occurred to me that (unless I'm missing something) the way to found a government on christianity is to NOT DO IT... PER JESUS.

It would seem to me that between "render unto Caesar" and "Judge not lest ye be judged..." that Jesus was trying to be pretty freakin clear.

_____________________________

I'm a lover of "what is", not because I'm a spiritual person, but because it hurts when I argue with reality. -- Bryon Katie
"You're humbly arrogant" -- sunshinemiss
officially a member of the K Crowd

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion - 8/29/2013 4:12:15 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
...Don't see God.....no matter.....its an opinion...my own thought... my own connection that I put lots of time into with study. I live in Jesus land and IM very proud of it.
Lets see how well men do with their own will and actions. lets see how equal it becomes. I hope it turns out well.

So tell us what this study was and what it is based on. Does David Barton or Wallbuilders figure into any of it?

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion - 8/29/2013 4:48:49 PM   
Apocalypso


Posts: 1104
Joined: 4/20/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
You're still wrong. Jefferson, who wrote the Declaration and was greatly influential in the writing of the Constitution, did not believe in a god in any conventional sense. He certainly did not believe in the Christian deities. He rewrote the new testament by removing all the "miracles," all references to the "resurrection" and all claims of divinity by Jesus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible


I think that's overstating it. Jefferson was certainly skeptical about claims to miracles and other supernatural happenings, as you'd expect from a deist.

But that doesn't mean he didn't believe in a god in a conventional sense. Lord Herbert's De Veritate was still the most influential deist text at the time and there's no evidence that Jefferson rejected any of it. And among the five Notitiae Communes (Common Notions) it included, the first two state that there is a supreme god and that he ought to be worshipped. Not only did most deists not dispute that, they held them to be universally accepted truths. Certainly on the balance of what we know, I think it's likely that was Jefferson's position as well.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Winterapple
Are the words Puritan and Christian interchangeable for some?
The Pilgrims weren't Puritans and would get cranky if you called
them that. Do all Christians believe the same things? If so why
are there so many Christian sects? I'm guessing the two Catholic
signers of the Constitution would balk at being described as Puritans.


The vast majority of Puritans wouldn't have self-described as such. It was largely a derogatory term used by their critics. They'd have been far more likely to call themselves "Godly", "Professors" or "of the Elect". It's useful shorthand now, but it wasn't used by them at the time.

quote:

And the thought of Alexander Hamilton being described as a Puritan
is very comical. He wasn't a Puritan in either outlook or cultural
heritage. If you read biographies of Washington, Jefferson, Franklin,
Adams they are not religious like today's evangelical fundies.
They were deist(at best). They believed strongly in the separation
of church and state and that no religion should be favored over
any other.


The Puritans also believed in the separation of church and state and for freedom of Christian worship (with the exception of Catholics). They wanted the individual church to be the highest form of religious authority. In the English Civil War, it's the main thing that differentiated them from the Presbyterians, who wanted a national church based on a hierarchy of Church elders.



_____________________________

If you're going to quote from the Book of Revelation,
Don't keep calling it the "Book of Revelations",
There's no "s", it's the Book of Revelation,
As revealed to Saint John the Divine.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion - 8/29/2013 5:39:30 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Apocalypso


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
You're still wrong. Jefferson, who wrote the Declaration and was greatly influential in the writing of the Constitution, did not believe in a god in any conventional sense. He certainly did not believe in the Christian deities. He rewrote the new testament by removing all the "miracles," all references to the "resurrection" and all claims of divinity by Jesus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible


I think that's overstating it. Jefferson was certainly skeptical about claims to miracles and other supernatural happenings, as you'd expect from a deist.

But that doesn't mean he didn't believe in a god in a conventional sense. Lord Herbert's De Veritate was still the most influential deist text at the time and there's no evidence that Jefferson rejected any of it. And among the five Notitiae Communes (Common Notions) it included, the first two state that there is a supreme god and that he ought to be worshipped. Not only did most deists not dispute that, they held them to be universally accepted truths. Certainly on the balance of what we know, I think it's likely that was Jefferson's position as well.

After reading a lot of Jefferson's surviving correspondence and other writings I'm confident that he was what would be called an agnostic today. He certainly was influenced heavily by Deists but I think he was going past them in questioning Christianity.

(in reply to Apocalypso)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion - 8/29/2013 6:11:54 PM   
BitYakin


Posts: 882
Joined: 10/15/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24

I said based on GOD not religion. There is a huge difference. If you read the constitution there are some key words through out the document that might give you a clue. I see them do you? You don't have to see them, you know and you don't have to believe. As I said in the other thread, one can deny God, but it really wouldn't be fair would it, if it wasn't brought to your attention and had a blind eye? Believe how you wish, no one makes a person believe.
MIght I add, that I used puritan as a coined word, I meant Christianity. Was John Hancock a Christian? Was his father a minister?

You're still wrong. Jefferson, who wrote the Declaration and was greatly influential in the writing of the Constitution, did not believe in a god in any conventional sense. He certainly did not believe in the Christian deities. He rewrote the new testament by removing all the "miracles," all references to the "resurrection" and all claims of divinity by Jesus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible

The other leaders were men of the enlightenment and belief in any sort of deity was not something that united or drove them. They conformed to the norms of the period but many were copious letter writes and those surviving letters depict men who thought a great deal and spent very little thought for the supernatural.



well its not true at all, to say "did not believe in a god in any conventional sense"

Although Jefferson's specific denominational and congregational ties were limited in his adulthood and his ever-evolving theological beliefs were distinctively his own, he was without a doubt a Protestant. One should keep in mind that despite his later self-stated non-affiliation with any specific denomination, he was raised as an Episcopalian, attended Episcopalian services many times as an adult and as President, and he expressed a clear affinity for Unitarianism. However these denominations may be classified now, uring Jefferson's lifetime, the Episcopal Church and the Unitarian Church were both considered to be Protestant denominations.

as far as christianity goes...

President Thomas Jefferson was a Protestant. Jefferson was raised as an Episcopalian (Anglican). He was also influenced by English Deists and has often been identified by historians as a Deist. He held many beliefs in common with Unitarians of the time period, and sometimes wrote that he thought the whole country would become Unitarian. He wrote that the teachings of Jesus contain the "outlines of a system of the most sublime morality which has ever fallen from the lips of man." Wrote: "I am of a sect by myself, as far as I know."

Jefferson was never a member of the Unitarian denomination nor was he ever active in a Unitarian congregation. However, he did once write that he would have liked to be a member of a Unitarian church, but he was not because there were no Unitarian churches in Virginia. It is not unreasonable to identify Jefferson as a Unitarian (with the caveat that, technically speaking, he was not actually one). However, it is a mistake to extrapolate from Jefferson's stated admiration for Unitarianism the notion that he was somehow "un-Christian" or "non-Christian." It is true that contemporary Unitarian-Universalists now classify their denomination as a distinct religion not confined as a subset of Christianity (although a large proportion of individual Unitarian-Universalists do indeed identify themselves as Christians). However, in Jefferson's day, Unitarianism was considerably different from its present form, and there was no concept that it was a non-Christian religion. Unitarianism in Jefferson's time was regarded as one liberal Protestant denomination among many other Protestant denominations extant in America. Virtually nobody thought of Jefferson as a non-Christian (or even non-Protestant) president.

futhermore

In a practical sense, classifying Jefferson as a "Deist" with regards to religious affiliation is misleading and meaningless. Jefferson was never affiliated with any organized Deist movement. This is a word that describes a theological position more than an actual religious affiliation, and as such it is of limited use from a sociological perspective. If one defines the term "Deist" broadly enough, then the writing of nearly every U.S. president or prominent historical figure could be used to classify them as a "Deist," so classifying people as such without at least some evidence of nominal self-identification is not very useful.

Adherents of other religious groups, including atheists and agnostics, also point to various writings of Jefferson which are in harmony with their positions. The difficulty in classifying Jefferson using a single word for religious affiliation does not stem from a lack of information, but rather a wealth of writing -- which can be interpreted differently depending on a person's perspective. Jefferson left a considerable amount of writing on political and philosophical issues, as well as writing about religion, including the "Jefferson Bible."


http://www.adherents.com/people/pj/Thomas_Jefferson.html

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109