RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BitYakin -> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (8/29/2013 6:20:47 PM)

quote:

The only persons considered founding fathers that can be considered to have been raised as Puritans were John and Samuel Adams and John Hancock. None were ministers, John Adams was lawyer, Samuel Adams was a brewer and John Hancock ran an import/export business.


UNTRUE

The signers of the Declaration of Independence were a profoundly intelligent, religious and ethically-minded group. Four of the signers of the Declaration of Independence were current or former full-time preachers, and many more were the sons of clergymen. Other professions held by signers include lawyers, merchants, doctors and educators. These individuals, too, were for the most part active churchgoers and many contributed significantly to their churches both with contributions as well as their service as lay leaders. The signers were members of religious denominations at a rate that was significantly higher than average for the American Colonies during the late 1700s.


http://www.adherents.com/gov/Founding_Fathers_Religion.html




dcnovice -> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (8/29/2013 6:35:25 PM)

quote:

http://www.adherents.com/people/pj/Thomas_Jefferson.html


From your own source:

Wrote: "I am of a sect by myself, as far as I know."

Later in his adult life Jefferson did not consider himself an Episcopalian, or a member of any other specific denomination. Later in life Jefferson held many clearly Christian, Deist, and Unitarian beliefs, but was not a member of any congregation or denomination.

By some of the more narrowly-conceived definitions of the word "Christian" which are in use today, particularly among Evangelicals since the 1940s, it is entirely possible that Jefferson's beliefs would mark him as a "non-Christian."

But Jefferson had real trouble with the Divinity of Christ and he had real trouble with the description of various events mentioned in both the New and the Old Testament so that he was an enlightened skeptic who was profoundly interested in the figure of Christ as a human being and as an ethical teacher. But he was not religious in any modern meaning of that word or any eighteenth century meaning of that word. He wasn't a regular church goer and he never affiliated himself with a religious denomination--unlike Washington who actually did.

The principal Founding Fathers--Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Franklin--were in fact deeply suspicious of a European pattern of governmental involvement in religion. They were deeply concerned about an involvement in religion because they saw government as corrupting religion.




Winterapple -> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (8/29/2013 6:38:29 PM)

I know the Puritans didn't run around calling themselves
Puritans. Elderly Beat poets will tell you vehemently they
never self described as Beats either. Such is often the case.

I never said or meant to infer anything about what Puritans
felt about the separation of church and state. For clarities
sake I should probably have put the Hamilton remarks separate
from my comments on the other Founders . But truly,
if you want an example of a Founding Father who wasn't
puritanical or pious in thoughts or actions I would be hard
pressed to offer up a better one than Hamilton. Or going by what
I know about him in any case. I don't have a history degree from
Glenn Beck University or anything.

After the Hamilton remark I mentioned some other founders
and their personal religious beliefs as well as their views on
government and religion. I stated they were not like modern
evangelical fundies. Meaning that I don't think they would
agree with the idea that the United States is or was ever
intended to be a Christian nation. I hope this clarifies
my point.

The founders I mentioned certainly Jefferson and Franklin
believed in the freedom of religious worship of all kind not
just Protestant Christian worship or just Christian worship.
Next to that the Puritan belief in freedom of worship for
Protestant Christians only seems rather small. But please
don't take any of my comments on the Puritans as hating
on them they had some good points. I don't think the
word Puritan is synonymous with asshole. Though no doubt
there were Puritan assholes as they are in all groups.




BitYakin -> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (8/29/2013 6:48:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

http://www.adherents.com/people/pj/Thomas_Jefferson.html


From your own source:

Wrote: "I am of a sect by myself, as far as I know."

Later in his adult life Jefferson did not consider himself an Episcopalian, or a member of any other specific denomination. Later in life Jefferson held many clearly Christian, Deist, and Unitarian beliefs, but was not a member of any congregation or denomination.

By some of the more narrowly-conceived definitions of the word "Christian" which are in use today, particularly among Evangelicals since the 1940s, it is entirely possible that Jefferson's beliefs would mark him as a "non-Christian."

But Jefferson had real trouble with the Divinity of Christ and he had real trouble with the description of various events mentioned in both the New and the Old Testament so that he was an enlightened skeptic who was profoundly interested in the figure of Christ as a human being and as an ethical teacher. But he was not religious in any modern meaning of that word or any eighteenth century meaning of that word. He wasn't a regular church goer and he never affiliated himself with a religious denomination--unlike Washington who actually did.

The principal Founding Fathers--Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Franklin--were in fact deeply suspicious of a European pattern of governmental involvement in religion. They were deeply concerned about an involvement in religion because they saw government as corrupting religion.




anddddd MAYBEEEEE thats why the rest of the founding father sent him off to france while they wrote the constitution so he couldn't push his RADICAL ideas into the constitution?

I wasn't there, but it seems ODD to me the guy who wrote that dec of ind wasn't invited to help write the constitution....


alsoooo

as pointed out in that source, just because you RETROACTIVLY change the meaning of something does not mean you get to CLAIM RETROACTIVLY that someone ISN'T something he clearly was at the time be was alive.

ALSO you say


"But Jefferson had real trouble with the Divinity of Christ and he had real trouble with the description of various events mentioned"

sorry but NO thats not CLEAR thats just how YOU chose to interpert what he wrote!


lets also keep in mind you draw jefferson like a GUN, but he is only ONE of over 200 founding fathers... I can show you quotes of several other founding fathers that say the OPPOSITE of what you beleive jefferson is saying!

are you going to force me to go on a quest to dig em up?

I can't remember the man's name but there is one founding father who is quoted (paraphrased) as saying RELIGION should absolutley be required in educational insitutions

also you do realize while it was defeated it was hoty debated that there should be a RELIGION TAX included in the constitution, BTW I think jefferson was against it!
the fact that there were enough people for it to make it an actual argument should tell you something!

see now you are going to say well the MAJORITY were against it and defeated it, and yess you are 100% correct there, which also makes jefferson a TEENY TINY MINORITY in this disscussion!








dcnovice -> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (8/29/2013 6:54:10 PM)

quote:

anddddd MAYBEEEEE thats why the rest of the founding father sent him off to france while they wrote the constitution so he couldn't push his RADICAL ideas into the constitution?

I wasn't there, but it seems ODD to me the guy who wrote that dec of ind wasn't invited to help write the constitution....

And it seems ODD to me that the guy you were touting in post 40 as an example of a Christian founding father is now, just a few posts later, a RADICAL who needs to be exiled so he won't infect the Constitution.

Yeah, that's a line of argument to take seriously--NOT.




BitYakin -> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (8/29/2013 7:06:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

anddddd MAYBEEEEE thats why the rest of the founding father sent him off to france while they wrote the constitution so he couldn't push his RADICAL ideas into the constitution?

I wasn't there, but it seems ODD to me the guy who wrote that dec of ind wasn't invited to help write the constitution....

And it seems ODD to me that the guy you were touting in post 40 as an example of a Christian founding father is now, just a few posts later, a RADICAL who needs to be exiled so he won't infect the Constitution.

Yeah, that's a line of argument to take seriously--NOT.



heyyy I wasn't there, I didn't tout him as anything, I quoted an article regarding his religion, I have often wondered why when he wrote such a compeling document as the DEC of IND he wasn't brought in to help write the constitution...

you tell ME why is wasn't there!?!?

do you think he wrote the dec of ind, then when the constitution was being written said NAAAAAAAAAAA I don't wanna be part of THAT!

also I invite you to reread my previous post as I added a bit to it obviosuly after you read it and responded




dcnovice -> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (8/29/2013 7:20:04 PM)

quote:

ALSO you say

"But Jefferson had real trouble with the Divinity of Christ and he had real trouble with the description of various events mentioned"

sorry but NO thats not CLEAR thats just how YOU chose to interpert what he wrote!

Had you troubled to read the material you were cutting and pasting, you'd know that the "real trouble" sentence is not my assertion. It's a quote--taken from, ahem, your own source--from Jon Butler, Dean of the Graduate School of Arts & Sciences at Yale University and author of Awash in a Sea of Faith: Christianizing the American People (Harvard University Press, 1990).


quote:

are you going to force me to go on a quest to dig em up?

Don't bother. At this point, I see no reason to take anything you post seriously.




BitYakin -> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (8/29/2013 7:37:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

ALSO you say

"But Jefferson had real trouble with the Divinity of Christ and he had real trouble with the description of various events mentioned"

sorry but NO thats not CLEAR thats just how YOU chose to interpert what he wrote!

Had you troubled to read the material you were cutting and pasting, you'd know that the "real trouble" sentence is not my assertion. It's a quote--taken from, ahem, your own source--from Jon Butler, Dean of the Graduate School of Arts & Sciences at Yale University and author of Awash in a Sea of Faith: Christianizing the American People (Harvard University Press, 1990).


quote:

are you going to force me to go on a quest to dig em up?

Don't bother. At this point, I see no reason to take anything you post seriously.


ohh well pardon me, that how Jon Butler chose to interpert it,

and off course you don't want to see ANYTHING else that doesn't agree with YOUR VIEWS
why does that NOT suprize me!?!?
its been clear you don't take anything seriously that does not agree with your position!

botton line jefferson is ONE person, out of over 200, who appears to may have felt as YOU DO, and for some unexplained reason was NOT included in the writing of the constitution!

and BTW, as I have stated in other threads I am NOT deeply religious, belong to NO CHURCH and firmly beleive there should be a seperation of church and state, I just get irked when people pull out some LETTER jefferson wrote and claim it PROVES EVERYTHING

it proves NOTHING except that thats how ONE MAN FELT!

PS. go ahead and put me on ignore, and you don't have to read or respond to me!




DomKen -> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (8/29/2013 8:19:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin

quote:

The only persons considered founding fathers that can be considered to have been raised as Puritans were John and Samuel Adams and John Hancock. None were ministers, John Adams was lawyer, Samuel Adams was a brewer and John Hancock ran an import/export business.


UNTRUE

The signers of the Declaration of Independence were a profoundly intelligent, religious and ethically-minded group. Four of the signers of the Declaration of Independence were current or former full-time preachers, and many more were the sons of clergymen. Other professions held by signers include lawyers, merchants, doctors and educators. These individuals, too, were for the most part active churchgoers and many contributed significantly to their churches both with contributions as well as their service as lay leaders. The signers were members of religious denominations at a rate that was significantly higher than average for the American Colonies during the late 1700s.


http://www.adherents.com/gov/Founding_Fathers_Religion.html

John Adams was a lawyer. Sam Adams was a brewer amd John Hancock was a businessman. None were ministers.

As always only read the words I write not the crazy shit you wish I'd written.

And yes, Jefferson was at most a Deist. He specifically rejected anything that could have been called Protestantism or any sort of conventional Christianity. Specifically he rejected the very concept of Jesus as divine.




DomKen -> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (8/29/2013 8:27:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin

anddddd MAYBEEEEE thats why the rest of the founding father sent him off to france while they wrote the constitution so he couldn't push his RADICAL ideas into the constitution?

I wasn't there, but it seems ODD to me the guy who wrote that dec of ind wasn't invited to help write the constitution....


Jefferson was appointed Minister to France, our closest and basically only ally at the time, in 1785 after the death of his wife because his friends were concerned about the depression he had fallen into. He remained there until the French Revolution began in 1789. The Constitutional Convention occurred over 4 months in 1787. So no he was not sent to France for any such ridiculous reason.

Furthermore his close friend and ally James Madison was a prominent voice in the Convention and much of the Constitution is based on his, influenced by Jefferson, ideas.




Phydeaux -> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (8/29/2013 10:31:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24

I said based on GOD not religion. There is a huge difference. If you read the constitution there are some key words through out the document that might give you a clue. I see them do you? You don't have to see them, you know and you don't have to believe. As I said in the other thread, one can deny God, but it really wouldn't be fair would it, if it wasn't brought to your attention and had a blind eye? Believe how you wish, no one makes a person believe.
MIght I add, that I used puritan as a coined word, I meant Christianity. Was John Hancock a Christian? Was his father a minister?

You're still wrong. Jefferson, who wrote the Declaration and was greatly influential in the writing of the Constitution, did not believe in a god in any conventional sense. He certainly did not believe in the Christian deities. He rewrote the new testament by removing all the "miracles," all references to the "resurrection" and all claims of divinity by Jesus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible

The other leaders were men of the enlightenment and belief in any sort of deity was not something that united or drove them. They conformed to the norms of the period but many were copious letter writes and those surviving letters depict men who thought a great deal and spent very little thought for the supernatural.


Lambert (2003) has examined the religious affiliations and beliefs of the Founders. Of the 55 delegates to the 1787 Constitutional Convention, 49 were Protestants, and two were Roman Catholics (D. Carroll, and Fitzsimons).[citation needed] Among the Protestant delegates to the Constitutional Convention, 28 were Church of England (or Episcopalian, after the American Revolutionary War was won), eight were Presbyterians, seven were Congregationalists, two were Lutherans, two were Dutch Reformed, and two were Methodists.[citation needed]

A few prominent Founding Fathers were anti-clerical Christians, such as Thomas Jefferson[19][20][21] (who created the so-called "Jefferson Bible") and Benjamin Franklin.[22] Others (most notably Thomas Paine) were deists, or at least held beliefs very similar to those of deists.[23]




Phydeaux -> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (8/29/2013 10:39:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24

I said based on GOD not religion. There is a huge difference. If you read the constitution there are some key words through out the document that might give you a clue. I see them do you? You don't have to see them, you know and you don't have to believe. As I said in the other thread, one can deny God, but it really wouldn't be fair would it, if it wasn't brought to your attention and had a blind eye? Believe how you wish, no one makes a person believe.
MIght I add, that I used puritan as a coined word, I meant Christianity. Was John Hancock a Christian? Was his father a minister?

You're still wrong. Jefferson, who wrote the Declaration and was greatly influential in the writing of the Constitution, did not believe in a god in any conventional sense. He certainly did not believe in the Christian deities. He rewrote the new testament by removing all the "miracles," all references to the "resurrection" and all claims of divinity by Jesus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible

The other leaders were men of the enlightenment and belief in any sort of deity was not something that united or drove them. They conformed to the norms of the period but many were copious letter writes and those surviving letters depict men who thought a great deal and spent very little thought for the supernatural.



Many make much of Jefferson's phrase "separation of church and state" yet forget the reason of it. Jefferson had a position in the church of england in virginia and was required to be so for political office - and was additionally required to take no action nor say ought that wasn't in accord with the church.

Pretty much everyone would agree that calls for some separation.

But people forget that Jefferson as president funded christian preachers to the indian lands. Jefferson, as president attended religious services in the house - and did not object to them because they were

Non discriminatory, and non forced.

Jefferson also often wrote that a belief in higher authority was necessary and providential for our nation. (Such as is his second(?) inaugural address....)




DesideriScuri -> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (8/29/2013 11:10:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin
anddddd MAYBEEEEE thats why the rest of the founding father sent him off to france while they wrote the constitution so he couldn't push his RADICAL ideas into the constitution?
I wasn't there, but it seems ODD to me the guy who wrote that dec of ind wasn't invited to help write the constitution....

Jefferson was appointed Minister to France, our closest and basically only ally at the time, in 1785 after the death of his wife because his friends were concerned about the depression he had fallen into. He remained there until the French Revolution began in 1789. The Constitutional Convention occurred over 4 months in 1787. So no he was not sent to France for any such ridiculous reason.
Furthermore his close friend and ally James Madison was a prominent voice in the Convention and much of the Constitution is based on his, influenced by Jefferson, ideas.


AHA! So, our DoI was written by a "soon-to-be" Minister! Bam!!! [8D]




DomKen -> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (8/30/2013 2:38:15 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24

I said based on GOD not religion. There is a huge difference. If you read the constitution there are some key words through out the document that might give you a clue. I see them do you? You don't have to see them, you know and you don't have to believe. As I said in the other thread, one can deny God, but it really wouldn't be fair would it, if it wasn't brought to your attention and had a blind eye? Believe how you wish, no one makes a person believe.
MIght I add, that I used puritan as a coined word, I meant Christianity. Was John Hancock a Christian? Was his father a minister?

You're still wrong. Jefferson, who wrote the Declaration and was greatly influential in the writing of the Constitution, did not believe in a god in any conventional sense. He certainly did not believe in the Christian deities. He rewrote the new testament by removing all the "miracles," all references to the "resurrection" and all claims of divinity by Jesus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible

The other leaders were men of the enlightenment and belief in any sort of deity was not something that united or drove them. They conformed to the norms of the period but many were copious letter writes and those surviving letters depict men who thought a great deal and spent very little thought for the supernatural.



Many make much of Jefferson's phrase "separation of church and state" yet forget the reason of it. Jefferson had a position in the church of england in virginia and was required to be so for political office - and was additionally required to take no action nor say ought that wasn't in accord with the church.

Pretty much everyone would agree that calls for some separation.

But people forget that Jefferson as president funded christian preachers to the indian lands.

Straight from Barton
http://gettingjeffersonright.com/david-bartons-capitol-tour-did-thomas-jefferson-spend-federal-funds-to-evangelize-the-kaskaskia-indians/

Personally I wouldn't believe anything that lying piece of shit claims.

quote:

Jefferson, as president attended religious services in the house - and did not object to them because they were

Non discriminatory, and non forced.

Another Barton claim
http://wthrockmorton.com/2011/04/david-barton-on-thomas-jefferson-did-jefferson-approve-church-in-the-capitol/

Seems likely that sort of church would not be considered as church today. Unless you know of a church where the members debate many different religious views?

quote:

Jefferson also often wrote that a belief in higher authority was necessary and providential for our nation. (Such as is his second(?) inaugural address....)

Saying it in a single speech doesn't make it often. His letters are far more frequently skeptical or down right dismissive of Christianity than supportive and in those letters and speeches where he does make mention of such positively it seems more or less a de rigueur addition.




JeffBC -> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (8/30/2013 2:53:14 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
AHA! So, our DoI was written by a "soon-to-be" Minister! Bam!!! [8D]

LOLOL. I know right? Because in and of itself that pretty much indicates a religious theocracy despite anything the actual people who actually wrote the document might have actually said at excruciating length in great detail to the contrary.




chatterbox24 -> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (8/30/2013 9:01:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
...Don't see God.....no matter.....its an opinion...my own thought... my own connection that I put lots of time into with study. I live in Jesus land and IM very proud of it.
Lets see how well men do with their own will and actions. lets see how equal it becomes. I hope it turns out well.

So tell us what this study was and what it is based on. Does David Barton or Wallbuilders figure into any of it?


A please would have been appreciated when asking[:D]

No sir, those studies from the most powerful book ever written. Specifically at this time and with this discussion. The whole book of Ephesians, which is quite short by the way. Read it if you would like to be included in that knowledge.




Phydeaux -> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (8/30/2013 9:02:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24

I said based on GOD not religion. There is a huge difference. If you read the constitution there are some key words through out the document that might give you a clue. I see them do you? You don't have to see them, you know and you don't have to believe. As I said in the other thread, one can deny God, but it really wouldn't be fair would it, if it wasn't brought to your attention and had a blind eye? Believe how you wish, no one makes a person believe.
MIght I add, that I used puritan as a coined word, I meant Christianity. Was John Hancock a Christian? Was his father a minister?

You're still wrong. Jefferson, who wrote the Declaration and was greatly influential in the writing of the Constitution, did not believe in a god in any conventional sense. He certainly did not believe in the Christian deities. He rewrote the new testament by removing all the "miracles," all references to the "resurrection" and all claims of divinity by Jesus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible

The other leaders were men of the enlightenment and belief in any sort of deity was not something that united or drove them. They conformed to the norms of the period but many were copious letter writes and those surviving letters depict men who thought a great deal and spent very little thought for the supernatural.



Many make much of Jefferson's phrase "separation of church and state" yet forget the reason of it. Jefferson had a position in the church of england in virginia and was required to be so for political office - and was additionally required to take no action nor say ought that wasn't in accord with the church.

Pretty much everyone would agree that calls for some separation.

But people forget that Jefferson as president funded christian preachers to the indian lands.

Straight from Barton
http://gettingjeffersonright.com/david-bartons-capitol-tour-did-thomas-jefferson-spend-federal-funds-to-evangelize-the-kaskaskia-indians/

Personally I wouldn't believe anything that lying piece of shit claims.

quote:

Jefferson, as president attended religious services in the house - and did not object to them because they were

Non discriminatory, and non forced.

Another Barton claim
http://wthrockmorton.com/2011/04/david-barton-on-thomas-jefferson-did-jefferson-approve-church-in-the-capitol/

Seems likely that sort of church would not be considered as church today. Unless you know of a church where the members debate many different religious views?

quote:

Jefferson also often wrote that a belief in higher authority was necessary and providential for our nation. (Such as is his second(?) inaugural address....)

Saying it in a single speech doesn't make it often. His letters are far more frequently skeptical or down right dismissive of Christianity than supportive and in those letters and speeches where he does make mention of such positively it seems more or less a de rigueur addition.



So all this post says is that you don't like Barton. As usual, no counter quotes. If you have no facts, pound the table.

And Jefferson wasn't dismissive to Christianity -- far from it. He was however *very* dismissive of clergy, and organizations. Don't conflate the two.

Jefferson didn't go to the effort of making his own bible, and studying it daily because he hated christianity - he believed that christ was an incredible moral authority. That kind of action speaks to a man that very firmly believes in God, and had the discipline of conviction.




DomKen -> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (8/30/2013 9:21:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
So all this post says is that you don't like Barton. As usual, no counter quotes. If you have no facts, pound the table.

And Jefferson wasn't dismissive to Christianity -- far from it. He was however *very* dismissive of clergy, and organizations. Don't conflate the two.

Jefferson didn't go to the effort of making his own bible, and studying it daily because he hated christianity - he believed that christ was an incredible moral authority. That kind of action speaks to a man that very firmly believes in God, and had the discipline of conviction.


I provided links to extensive debunkings of this stuff by scholars who went to the primary sources and you simply ignored it.

Here let me make it easy for you
http://gettingjeffersonright.com/david-bartons-capitol-tour-did-thomas-jefferson-spend-federal-funds-to-evangelize-the-kaskaskia-indians/
http://wthrockmorton.com/2011/04/david-barton-on-thomas-jefferson-did-jefferson-approve-church-in-the-capitol/


Yes Jefferson was dismissive of Christianity. He edited a bible that left out every single mention of any supernatural claim.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible
http://www.angelfire.com/co/JeffersonBible/

He very firmly did not believe in any god described in any "holy" text. He quite specifically rejected the entire NT's claims of divinity for Jesus.

Now for some actual real statements by Jefferson showing he was not a devout Christian
Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because if there be one he must approve of the homage of reason more than that of blindfolded fear.
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 10, 1787

I concur with you strictly in your opinion of the comparative merits of atheism and demonism, and really see nothing but the latter in the being worshipped by many who think themselves Christians.
Thomas Jefferson, letter to Richard Price, Jan. 8, 1789 (Richard Price had written to TJ on Oct. 26. about the harm done by religion and wrote "Would not Society be better without Such religions? Is Atheism less pernicious than Demonism?")

The whole history of these books [the Gospels] is so defective and doubtful that it seems vain to attempt minute enquiry into it: and such tricks have been played with their text, and with the texts of other books relating to them, that we have a right, from that cause, to entertain much doubt what parts of them are genuine. In the New Testament there is internal evidence that parts of it have proceeded from an extraordinary man; and that other parts are of the fabric of very inferior minds. It is as easy to separate those parts, as to pick out diamonds from dunghills.
Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Adams, January 24, 1814

To talk of immaterial existences is to talk of nothings. To say that the human soul, angels, god, are immaterial, is to say they are nothings, or that there is no god, no angels, no soul. I cannot reason otherwise: but I believe I am supported in my creed of materialism by Locke, Tracy, and Stewart
Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Adams, Aug. 15, 1820

And the day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerve in the brain of Jupiter. But may we hope that the dawn of reason and freedom of thought in these United States will do away with this artificial scaffolding, and restore to us the primitive and genuine doctrines of this most venerated reformer of human errors.
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to John Adams, April 11, 1823




chatterbox24 -> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (8/30/2013 10:14:23 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
So all this post says is that you don't like Barton. As usual, no counter quotes. If you have no facts, pound the table.

And Jefferson wasn't dismissive to Christianity -- far from it. He was however *very* dismissive of clergy, and organizations. Don't conflate the two.

Jefferson didn't go to the effort of making his own bible, and studying it daily because he hated christianity - he believed that christ was an incredible moral authority. That kind of action speaks to a man that very firmly believes in God, and had the discipline of conviction.


I provided links to extensive debunkings of this stuff by scholars who went to the primary sources and you simply ignored it.

Here let me make it easy for you
http://gettingjeffersonright.com/david-bartons-capitol-tour-did-thomas-jefferson-spend-federal-funds-to-evangelize-the-kaskaskia-indians/
http://wthrockmorton.com/2011/04/david-barton-on-thomas-jefferson-did-jefferson-approve-church-in-the-capitol/


Yes Jefferson was dismissive of Christianity. He edited a bible that left out every single mention of any supernatural claim.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible
http://www.angelfire.com/co/JeffersonBible/

He very firmly did not believe in any god described in any "holy" text. He quite specifically rejected the entire NT's claims of divinity for Jesus.

Now for some actual real statements by Jefferson showing he was not a devout Christian
Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because if there be one he must approve of the homage of reason more than that of blindfolded fear.
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 10, 1787

I concur with you strictly in your opinion of the comparative merits of atheism and demonism, and really see nothing but the latter in the being worshipped by many who think themselves Christians.
Thomas Jefferson, letter to Richard Price, Jan. 8, 1789 (Richard Price had written to TJ on Oct. 26. about the harm done by religion and wrote "Would not Society be better without Such religions? Is Atheism less pernicious than Demonism?")

The whole history of these books [the Gospels] is so defective and doubtful that it seems vain to attempt minute enquiry into it: and such tricks have been played with their text, and with the texts of other books relating to them, that we have a right, from that cause, to entertain much doubt what parts of them are genuine. In the New Testament there is internal evidence that parts of it have proceeded from an extraordinary man; and that other parts are of the fabric of very inferior minds. It is as easy to separate those parts, as to pick out diamonds from dunghills.
Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Adams, January 24, 1814

To talk of immaterial existences is to talk of nothings. To say that the human soul, angels, god, are immaterial, is to say they are nothings, or that there is no god, no angels, no soul. I cannot reason otherwise: but I believe I am supported in my creed of materialism by Locke, Tracy, and Stewart
Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Adams, Aug. 15, 1820

And the day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerve in the brain of Jupiter. But may we hope that the dawn of reason and freedom of thought in these United States will do away with this artificial scaffolding, and restore to us the primitive and genuine doctrines of this most venerated reformer of human errors.
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to John Adams, April 11, 1823



All it points to for me is he did not be believe in Jesus or any kind of mystic being born as flesh to experience our lives and save us. He was not a bit interested in God though? or proving this long told story wrong? He went as far as to make his own bible? lol. With all due respect to a very fine great man who holds a huge place in history, having a very logical mind and great intelligence could make one feel like a God themselves and very unaccepting to supernatural events that can not be explained by them.




JeffBC -> RE: The US Constitution is not based on religion (8/30/2013 10:19:55 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
No sir, those studies from the most powerful book ever written. Specifically at this time and with this discussion. The whole book of Ephesians, which is quite short by the way. Read it if you would like to be included in that knowledge.

Hey chatterbox... I had a question earlier and it was meant as a real question not some rhetorical jab. From your viewpoint how do you reconcile:

"Render unto caesar..." and "Judge not..." with a theocracy? Because those two together sound a lot like Jesus himself advocating for separation of church & state. But hey, I'm not a theologian. Do you see an issue there at all? Did I miss the boat when I said "theocracy"? Thoughts?




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625