Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Any minute now


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Any minute now Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Any minute now - 9/6/2013 6:18:29 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


~ FR ~

From the Jerusalem Post, quoting ABC and the New York Times...

Despite statements from both US President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry that a US-led strike on Syria would be a "limited and tailored" military attack, ABC News reported on Thursday that the strike planned by Obama's national security team is "significantly larger" than most have anticipated.

According to ABC News, in additional to a salvo of 200 Tomahawk cruise missiles fired from four Navy destroyers stationed in the eastern Mediterranean, the US is also planning an aerial campaign that is expected to last two days.

This campaign potentially includes an aerial bombardment of missiles and long range bombs from US-based B-2 stealth bombers that carry satellite-guided bombs, B-52 bombers, that can carry air-launched cruise missiles and Qatar-based B-1s that carry long-range, air-to-surface missiles, both ABC News and The New York Times reported.

"This military strike will do more damage to [Syrian President Bashar] Assad's forces in 48 hours than the Syrian rebels have done in two years," a national security official told ABC News.

Meanwhile, Obama has directed the Pentagon to expand the list of potential targets in Syria following reports Assad's forces have moved troops and equipment used to employ chemical weapons in anticipation of the US-led strike against them, the Times reported on Thursday.


K.



Did Geraldo go back to ABC? Talk about "telegraphing your punches". These idiots should be hunted down and prosecuted.

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Any minute now - 9/6/2013 7:11:17 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

There is no imminent threat to the US. Terrorists getting their hands on chemical weapons and using them against Americans at some point in time, isn't imminent.


Ha ha ha ha. That is fuckin cute. I see you disagree with it being imminent.

Nevertheless, it is imminent. A fiscal disaster is imminent in this country, and has been since Reagan.

at some point in time is a sense of imminent.



https://www.google.com/search?q=imminent&rlz=1C1CHMG_en-USUS291&oq=imminent&aqs=chrome..69i57&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

im·mi·nent
ˈimənənt/Submit
adjective
1.
about to happen.
"they were in imminent danger of being swept away"
synonyms: impending, close (at hand), near, (fast) approaching, coming, forthcoming, on the way, in the offing, in the pipeline, on the horizon, in the air, just around the corner, coming down the pike, expected, anticipated, brewing, looming, threatening, menacing; More
2.
archaic
overhanging.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Any minute now - 9/6/2013 7:12:49 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
That is correct. Imminent, it is.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Any minute now - 9/6/2013 7:38:04 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
That is correct. Imminent, it is.


Please cite your sources that show an imminent attack on the US.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Any minute now - 9/6/2013 7:40:05 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
LOL I think you may need to re read his post again, from another angle.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Any minute now - 9/6/2013 8:06:53 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
LOL I think you may need to re read his post again, from another angle.


His stance has been, for over a week now, that the US is in imminent danger of attack. And, that is why President Obama has the authority to "send in the Marines" (so to speak) without needing Congressional approval.

He has yet to show where there is an actual "imminent" threat of attack on the US.

And, his idea of an "imminent threat?"
    quote:

    Yup, Obama was right. Here there is an imminent threat however, to us and the world.
    Same with Biden, the president has no constitutional authority to take us to WAR. This will not be a war. There is no war, but an imminent threat, since the use of chemical weapons is banned anywhere in this globe.


I'm pretty sure there aren't any citations showing imminent threat of attack on the US, regardless of how much he skews and spins definitions.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Any minute now - 9/6/2013 8:14:13 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:


His stance has been, for over a week now, that the US is in imminent danger of attack.


How about you cobble your own blowholing up and try to explain that credibly, and quit misrepresenting mine continuously? Particularly when you quote the fucking thing in the same post.

Once more for the vacuously slow witted:

Here there is an imminent threat however, to us and the world.

And again:

There is no war, but an imminent threat, since the use of chemical weapons is banned anywhere in this globe.

Think in terms of realpolitik. (which is a word most of you should look up, rather than guess at).

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Any minute now - 9/6/2013 8:27:28 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
quote:

His stance has been, for over a week now, that the US is in imminent danger of attack.

How about you cobble your own blowholing up and try to explain that credibly, and quit misrepresenting mine continuously? Particularly when you quote the fucking thing in the same post.
Once more for the vacuously slow witted:
Here there is an imminent threat however, to us and the world.
And again:
There is no war, but an imminent threat, since the use of chemical weapons is banned anywhere in this globe.
Think in terms of realpolitik. (which is a word most of you should look up, rather than guess at).


Please show where the is an imminent threat "to us." I don't care if there is an imminent threat to anywhere else in the world, as that does not give the US authority to invade a sovereign country.




_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Any minute now - 9/6/2013 8:33:27 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Already asked and answered, several times this week. Show us where the imminent threat isn't.

On a separate note, we always invade sovereign countries without the glimmer of a fuck of care. Why grouse about that shit this many wars into it?

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 9/6/2013 8:38:25 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Any minute now - 9/6/2013 8:46:09 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Already asked and answered, several times this week. Show us where the imminent threat isn't.
On a separate note, we always invade sovereign countries without the glimmer of a fuck of care. Why grouse about that shit this many wars into it?


Invading a sovereign country where we have no authority to do so? I do apologize for not protesting Korea 20-some years prior to birth, though. A failure on my part, I suppose.

There is no imminent threat to the US.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Any minute now - 9/6/2013 8:51:32 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
What authority do we need, read your constitution pal, and your war powers act, as I told you in the other thread, and cite the language for that.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Any minute now - 9/6/2013 9:40:45 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
What authority do we need, read your constitution pal, and your war powers act, as I told you in the other thread, and cite the language for that.


50 U.S.C. § 1541 - Purpose and policy
    quote:

    (a) Congressional declaration

      It is the purpose of this chapter to fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States and insure that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and to the continued use of such forces in hostilities or in such situations.

    (b) Congressional legislative power under necessary and proper clause

      Under article I, section 8, of the Constitution, it is specifically provided that the Congress shall have the power to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution, not only its own powers but also all other powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any department or officer hereof.

    (c) Presidential executive power as Commander-in-Chief; limitation

      The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to
        (1) a declaration of war,
        (2) specific statutory authorization, or
        (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.


(a) "collective judgment" - both Legislative and Executive Branches will have a say. Both.
(c) Limitations to the President's ability to send in the troops
(c)(1) There is no DoW
(c)(2) There is no specific statutory authorization
(c)(3) There is no national emergency created by an attack upon the US, it's territories or possessions, or it's armed forces.

50 U.S.C. § 1543 - Reporting requirement
    quote:

    (a) Written report; time of submission; circumstances necessitating submission; information reported

      In the absence of a declaration of war, in any case in which United States Armed Forces are introduced—

        (1) into hostilities or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances;
        (2) into the territory, airspace or waters of a foreign nation, while equipped for combat, except for deployments which relate solely to supply, replacement, repair, or training of such forces; or
        (3) in numbers which substantially enlarge United States Armed Forces equipped for combat already located in a foreign nation;

      the President shall submit within 48 hours to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the President pro tempore of the Senate a report, in writing, setting forth—

        (A) the circumstances necessitating the introduction of United States Armed Forces;
        (B) the constitutional and legislative authority under which such introduction took place; and
        (C) the estimated scope and duration of the hostilities or involvement.


(a) implies that without a DoW, the President can send in the armed forces, but still has to be able to cite the Constitutional and legislative authority under which he is acting. While that only requires him to do so within 48 hours of military insertion, he still has to abide by 50 U.S.C. § 1541 (c)(2 or 3).



_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Any minute now - 9/6/2013 9:44:40 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:


The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities...


Please learn to read, it isn't going to go well for you if you cannot comprehend third grade level sentences.

Yanno, boots on the ground.........ye old war powers act, and he has 30 days to do it allie allie in free, actually 60. (not that the law is unconstitutional and will be challenged some day) I notice the nutsuckers whined and gnashed their teeth about Libya, but same as here we got the AUMF still overriding it.



< Message edited by mnottertail -- 9/6/2013 9:47:14 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Any minute now - 9/6/2013 11:58:25 AM   
MrBukani


Posts: 1920
Joined: 4/18/2010
Status: offline
Any minute now the surpluss will be released...Duck.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Any minute now - 9/6/2013 12:14:24 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
There is no imminent threat to the US. Terrorists getting their hands on chemical weapons and using them against Americans at some point in time, isn't imminent.
Ha ha ha ha. That is fuckin cute. I see you disagree with it being imminent.
Nevertheless, it is imminent. A fiscal disaster is imminent in this country, and has been since Reagan.
at some point in time is a sense of imminent.


Saddam could have restarted his WMD program. Saddam could have bought WMD from elsewhere. According to your definition, then, going into Iraq to take out Saddam was just protecting us from an imminent threat.

Could use that same line of reasoning to invade any not-rock-solid-stable ME country.

Brilliant.



Nope, because he did not restart it, it was verified by the UN, and George Tenet in the CIA, and the DIA, that he didnt have a program, or have them.

Here, we are quite sure that somefuckinbody in Syria has Chemical Weapons.




AHAHAHHHHHAHHHHAH ah hah haha hahah what a ludicrous position.

You have widely derided Bush and the Iraq war - despite the clear and overwhelming evidence that Hussein gassed Iranians, Kurds, and Basranians. Remember Halabja?

LOL.. Remember the conviction of 'Chemical Ali'.

So your position is remarkably maleable. It ignores chemical weapons when its Bush and yet, suddenly Obama wants to strike because Sadam kills 1400 - why its an Outrage!
An Outrage!.

Your definition of "imminent threat" is maleable too.
And your precognitive powers are amazing to be able to clearly ennunciate what the clear and imminent danger is - when even Democrats have posted there isn't one. Oh. Wait. You haven't.

What exactly is the imminent threat, I wonder. That Assad has chemical weapons? Didn't he have them last year.. and 5 years ago? Ten years ago? Twenty years ago?

You'd have thunk some president between then and now would have thought "Gee, Assad is an imminent threat. We should do something about that." Twenty years later, one did.

HEE HEE HEE.


< Message edited by Phydeaux -- 9/6/2013 12:15:49 PM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Any minute now - 9/6/2013 12:28:13 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Uh, saddams chemical weapons usage was some 12 years prior to the attack by us(imminent, as it were) and not the reason we went in there.


Here is some news for some of you untutored slobberers, this is not the first chemical weapons attack in Syria, there have been many smaller ones we also have known about.......................but this went too far, we cannot wink and nod at every occasion of even bolder defiance of world law.

And my position is not malleable, and some democrat said something and some nutsucker said something, and guess what?

I'm saying something. You are saying something, as foolish as it is. You can laugh like woody woodpecker and slobber like cujo, but will always remain in thorough obscurity and untutored.


< Message edited by mnottertail -- 9/6/2013 12:43:32 PM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Any minute now - 9/6/2013 1:42:38 PM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

and some democrat said something and some nutsucker said something,



You repeat yourself.

_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Any minute now - 9/6/2013 2:13:32 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
nope, nutsuckers are nutsuckers, democrats are democrats, and they are twain and separate.

Samuel Adams, a patriot, a beermaker. Ah, but I repeat myself.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 9/6/2013 2:15:28 PM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Any minute now - 9/6/2013 9:11:40 PM   
Marini


Posts: 3629
Joined: 2/14/2010
Status: offline
I am glad that I was wrong last week.

Any minute now has not happened, and I hope it does not.

I do feel that the even if the US does not become involved in Syria, we are kicking the can down the road.

..............Iran is the bigger threat..............

Peace

_____________________________

As always, To EACH their Own.
"And as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. "
Nelson Mandela
Life-long Democrat, not happy at all with Democratic Party.
NOT a Republican/Moderate and free agent

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Any minute now - 9/7/2013 2:47:53 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
Marini, let Europe and Israel handle Iran.

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to Marini)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Any minute now Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094