DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail Yeah, and so what? he said 'red line' couple of times. . . . do you need to commit suicide over it by choking on your own bile? WTF? chemical weapons are outlawed in the world. Now, kiilling a few million of your countrymen as the party in power may or may not be reprehensible, but it is not outright illegal is it? But kill them with chemical weapons..........that is a world matter. Yanno, sandanistas, cubans, tianemen square, angola, vietnam, korea, and so on........... Whats the big fuckin deal? The administration said that is a no no, and would get involved, wasn't really worried if Assad is protecting the government legally. Hey, think about grenada, panamanian strong man Manuel Noriega. Was that all good shit because the word redline wasn't used? Is it the word redline you find offensive to your sensibilities? The sad thing is that Obama clearly drew a red line. Now, he's saying it wasn't him drawing it. If it's such a clear red line, where is the UN? Or, is it that we (the US) are going to have to be World Police because there isn't anyone out there that will do it? If there is such a clear crossing of the GC, does the UNSC really have any option but to authorize military action? I said before I wished Obama wouldn't have drawn the red line. That, essentially, commits the US to action, if it's crossed. If the GC is crossed, who is responsible for policing? The World Community needs to come together on this. If the World Community isn't willing or able to come together on this, then, we (the US) don't have the authority to do it ourselves. If we do it anyway, we'll be opening ourselves up for direct backlash, which could very easily not be in our favor. But, for Obama to draw a red line and then backtrack about it is ridiculous. I agree that he didn't just pull it out of thin air, though. IMO, he simply pulled it out of his ass.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|