sunshinemiss -> RE: -=50 Shades of Grey is useful for BDSM after all=- (9/7/2013 3:47:50 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist Is there a good book in it despite any BDSM inaccuracies? No. From a reader's standpoint, it is poorly written. Terrible word choice, terrible plot, unbelievable characters, not even a decent climax (neither of the literary nor the orgasmic manner). It hurt my head to read it. Does the book get better or does it hold to the Harlequin romance formula? I read bodice rippers. One step or more ABOVE the harlequin romance type, but yes, I read them. Even Harlequin would be embarrassed to have this book on their shelves. Honestly, I don't mind formulas... when I know I'm going to get a formula. Julie Garwood books, for example, all have the same kind of woman, the same kind of man. The women all have some quirk that makes them more human and are reluctant damsels in distress. The men all have some broken place in them that needs the woman to heal. In that way, they are predictable. What makes the books pleasant is the author's word choice, the flow, the humor in the books. But I like her way of turning a phrase. At some point I find myself laughing out loud when reading her books. That doesn't often happen when I read, so that one moment (or several) makes it totally worth my while to read her books. It's like... I can drive down the highway to get to where I'm going, but I'd rather take the back roads and enjoy the scenery. The 50 Shades book is drivel that is like driving through a factory town that has been deserted. Sure there's SOME interesting this or that, but they are so few and far between that they get lost in the dross. I also quite like surprises. This book just... fizzles out. This is not an enjoyable surprise.
|
|
|
|