RE: Male Superiority? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive



Message

ChatteParfaitt -> RE: Male Superiority? (9/21/2013 2:28:41 PM)

FR: I'm totally with red on this one, my submission is hot-wired into my sexuality. Despite being dominant in personality, I am highly sexually submissive (not that unusual).

I never call Himself Master -- except during certain intimate moments.

Although my submission has filtered out far beyond the bedroom, the foundation is based on the sexual chemistry between us. I would not have a clue how to separate it. A huge part of this is that he's a great lover, and in my mind males that are great lovers are in touch with their feminine side. I think you have to be to know how women respond sexually.



SerWhiteTiger -> RE: Male Superiority? (9/21/2013 3:28:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Daddy133

Yes, male being superiors to worthless slabs of meaningless flesh with absolutely no redeeming qualities is the "natural order" and the way the world should be. If all women were trained from birth in the art of pleasing and worshiping their male superiors than we could create heaven on earth, as women were designed to be sexually, physically, emotionally, and mentally submissive to men. And I plan on creating the natural order on earth. That way a man will never have to worry again. A man will truly be happy and know they will have a virgin sex slave at whatever age he chooses delivered to him upon him turning into a man. And girls will truly be happy in their servitude of their male superiors. A man shouldn't have to woo a woman. He's a man. If he can overpower a girl, then it his right by nature to have his way with her. And girls don't know what they want by programming. God designed them that way so they can finally experience the truest and most beloved joy in their life when they're finally stripped of their dignity, and taught their place on their hands and knees serving us. :) Trust me, I designed you ladies that way.

In the words of me, "I am your God. And you are my slave. And I'll whip you until you learn to behave."


[sm=pigsfly.gif]



angelikaJ -> RE: Male Superiority? (9/21/2013 3:39:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Daddy133

In the words of me, "I am your God. And you are my slave. And I'll whip you until you learn to behave."


I know some people found this to be amusing; I didn't.
I found it sad: what better example to show you have no control over someone is there than you have to whip someone to teach them how to behave.

[My] Master inspires me to be obedient and my behaving well is something He doesn't have to generally worry about.

But if whipping is all you've got?
That is sad.



sexyred1 -> RE: Male Superiority? (9/21/2013 3:58:08 PM)

No, not amusing. Delusional.



stef -> RE: Male Superiority? (9/21/2013 6:21:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

Same here. His posts show a fundamental lack of understanding of the BDSM D/s community. Or even how to behave like something more than a horny 13 year old.

You should apologize to horny 13 year olds for that unwarranted association.



DarkSteven -> RE: Male Superiority? (9/21/2013 6:58:55 PM)

Already discussed.



OsideGirl -> RE: Male Superiority? (9/21/2013 7:46:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

Same here. His posts show a fundamental lack of understanding of the BDSM D/s community. Or even how to behave like something more than a horny 13 year old.

You should apologize to horny 13 year olds for that unwarranted association.


True. How about MMORPG players living in Mom's basement?



Greta75 -> RE: Male Superiority? (9/21/2013 8:17:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Daddy133

Yes, male being superiors to worthless slabs of meaningless flesh with absolutely no redeeming qualities is the "natural order" and the way the world should be. If all women were trained from birth in the art of pleasing and worshiping their male superiors than we could create heaven on earth, as women were designed to be sexually, physically, emotionally, and mentally submissive to men. And I plan on creating the natural order on earth. That way a man will never have to worry again. A man will truly be happy and know they will have a virgin sex slave at whatever age he chooses delivered to him upon him turning into a man. And girls will truly be happy in their servitude of their male superiors. A man shouldn't have to woo a woman. He's a man. If he can overpower a girl, then it his right by nature to have his way with her. And girls don't know what they want by programming. God designed them that way so they can finally experience the truest and most beloved joy in their life when they're finally stripped of their dignity, and taught their place on their hands and knees serving us. :) Trust me, I designed you ladies that way.

In the words of me, "I am your God. And you are my slave. And I'll whip you until you learn to behave."

I think you read too much John Norman dude. Good luck!
By the way, why block this guy? I didn't know free speech isn't allowed. Everybody has their own interpretation of this subject. This is his and it's honest. There are men like this one out there. Facts of life, and possibly subs/slaves who "might" be drawn and attracted to his *eyes roll* "male superiority complex".




Greta75 -> RE: Male Superiority? (9/21/2013 8:21:39 PM)

Things that involve physical strength, generally men are better than women. Like there are barely any female fire fighters as they may have difficulty hauling a big man out of the fire.

But good thing physical strength is not required in D/S, thus there is no superiority, both are each other equal ying and yang and can't do without each other to enjoy what they enjoy.



Arturas -> RE: Male Superiority? (9/21/2013 11:01:37 PM)

Things that involve commanding without emotional bias is what men are stronger at. Physical strength supports the already strong male confidence and Doms must be confident and therefore men are superior and strength is therefore required for a superior Dom in a Ds relationship..



sexyred1 -> RE: Male Superiority? (9/22/2013 7:06:46 AM)

Not all men are confident, lacking emotional decision making, physically stronger than women or make sweeping generalizations.



DarkSteven -> RE: Male Superiority? (9/22/2013 7:31:07 AM)

Three issues here.

1. Comparing men and women is difficult because we people tend to think in terms of individuals. To properly compare characteristics such as height, weight, general temperament, etc., we need to be aware of distributions of populations and subpopulations. And that ain't easy. Saying things like "men are taller than women" really means "The mean height of men is greater than the mean height of women." Most people simply do not think in this manner.

2. A lot of the differences between genders, is based on highly subjective opinions as well as anecdotal evidence. For example, my own ideas are that women tend to be more empathetic, relate more to people's feelings and less to goal-oriented achievements, more relationship-minded, etc. Their activities tend to be more "house-y" and less sports-oriented. They do home repairs less, and have a better sense of interior design. Other people, especially those from other cultures, might have different ideas.

3. The concept of superiority implies a value judgment. If a man's method of project management got the job done more quickly and better quality than a woman's way, but the woman's way produced a happier workforce and less dysfunction, which is better? The criteria used in the value judgment itself introduces bias.



myotherself -> RE: Male Superiority? (9/22/2013 8:42:47 AM)

I command without emotional bias every day - it's my job. I do my job at least as well as my male colleagues and better than most. I am very confident in my ability to lead and I don't need physical strength to back it up.

So that makes me a very confident woman with good leadership skills. And yet I'm a slave to my Master. He's not my superior, he's the one that we have both chosen to lead the relationship. We have our roles, and neither role is superior or inferior to the other - they are complementary and mutually supportive.



Arturas -> RE: Male Superiority? (9/22/2013 9:27:13 AM)

Dom and sub are indeed complimentary in role and relationship. This does not mean the female submissive seeks her equal in a Dom. The leader might be equal to the led in a vanilla relationship but in a Ds relationship it is not one of leader and follower but of one in total command and the one who submits to his will. They are complementary but not equal. The one in command is indeed a leader but not only that in a Ds relationship. This is not a generalization but perhaps does have a few exceptions, nonetheless, in most any female submissive's profile I cannot help but notice she is not seeking her equal and if she says she does then she submits to her equal and of course that does not last long. No, not long.



Arturas -> RE: Male Superiority? (9/22/2013 9:43:22 AM)

quote:

I think you have to be to know how women respond sexually.


A great Dom must know how women respond sexually but this means he is (well and generally) experienced as a male and not in touch with anything except his ability to cause women to respond on a sexual level and as a Dom also well knowing how she responds mentally and emotionally and physically outside of the sexual arena.



OrionTheWolf -> RE: Male Superiority? (9/22/2013 9:57:24 AM)

That post made by that user has nothing to do with John Norman.

Maybe those that live in online venues may have those views, but that would be only the one's with no clue.

Let that guy own his post without attributing it to things other than himself.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

I think you read too much John Norman dude. Good luck!
By the way, why block this guy? I didn't know free speech isn't allowed. Everybody has their own interpretation of this subject. This is his and it's honest. There are men like this one out there. Facts of life, and possibly subs/slaves who "might" be drawn and attracted to his *eyes roll* "male superiority complex".






OsideGirl -> RE: Male Superiority? (9/22/2013 10:25:47 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
I didn't know free speech isn't allowed.



It's a privately owned business where each person agreed to the ToS when they became a member, so freedom of speech doesn't extend onto a privately owned website. Just like you have the right to tell people what can be discussed in your own living room.

If he is not abiding by the rules that he agreed to when he became a member, they have every right to block him.

http://cnreviews.com/life/society-culture/internet-freedom-of-speech-not-guaranteed_20090426.html

http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2009/09/free-speech-in-online-communities-the-delusion-of-entitlement/



Gauge -> RE: Male Superiority? (9/22/2013 11:08:13 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl


It's a privately owned business where each person agreed to the ToS when they became a member, so freedom of speech doesn't extend onto a privately owned website. Just like you have the right to tell people what can be discussed in your own living room.

If he is not abiding by the rules that he agreed to when he became a member, they have every right to block him.

http://cnreviews.com/life/society-culture/internet-freedom-of-speech-not-guaranteed_20090426.html

http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2009/09/free-speech-in-online-communities-the-delusion-of-entitlement/


Oh... now you've done it. I expect to see the, "But that is censorship! And I hate censorship!" crowd in ...3 ...2 ...1



Greta75 -> RE: Male Superiority? (9/22/2013 10:12:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf
That post made by that user has nothing to do with John Norman.


It sounds very John Norman - ish. The idea that women are born to want to serve man and be beneath them. And I interprete the fact that he has stories about capturing independent women who believes in their equality to men from earth to convert them into sexual slaves and loving their position as one, is to prove this point.



Greta75 -> RE: Male Superiority? (9/22/2013 10:17:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl
It's a privately owned business where each person agreed to the ToS when they became a member, so freedom of speech doesn't extend onto a privately owned website. Just like you have the right to tell people what can be discussed in your own living room.

Except, I personally do not see his point of view about male superiority is breaking any of this forum rules, except it is not a popular view. His response was inline with the topic of this thread. Everyone says no to the question. He says Yes.



Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.711914E-02