Kirata
Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006 From: USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf All I had to do was fill out paperwork,show ID and pay. Then wait for the reply in the mail, which was my license. quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961 I don't know about other states, but when I had a CCW, I had to take a proficiency test to get it. This is where I have a problem. It is clear that the meaning of the word "militia" in the 2nd Amendment is an armed people, but there is a difference between a militia in reserve and an active militia. The minute you step off your property and go among the public armed, in my opinion you become active militia and subject to the well-regulated clause. The meaning of "regulated" has changed over the years, today having the connotation of "control," but in the context of the 2nd Amendment the meaning was "well-ordered," i.e., well turned-out with servicable arms that they know how to use. In my view, there is no infringement in requiring that people who go among the public armed demonstrate a level of proficiency that is consonant with public safety and their weapon's effective use. The comments quoted above illustrate that in some states there is no proficiency requirement at all. In most states, it is woefully inadequate at best. And in some states, you can take the range test with an easily-controlled .22 pistol, collect your carry license, then head to the gun store and saddle up a .357 magnum. In my opinion, that's just fucking ridiculous. I've given some thought to this, but as I'm already off-topic I'll leave it there. K.
|