DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle quote:
That sounds like you're in favor of stifling free speech because it might be used by some other person as reason for killing. While that may have merit, it sure sounds like you're completely ignoring that the other person chose to kill. This raises an interesting point. There would be no doubt that bigots like this would be breaking the law if they incited their own followers to violence. Yet the argument you posed, "you're completely ignoring that the other person chose to kill" could apply just as much to their own followers too. It could be argued that the followers 'chose' to commit violence, hence the person doing the inciting isn't responsible for their actions. My feeling is that if speech or actions leads to violence, and known to lead to violence then it comes under the microscope. Who commits the violence - friend or foe - isn't as important as the intent behind the words and actions. Then, "latent" incitement would be included. What of the Imams that support their followers that go apeshit when a douchbag like Jones exhibits his ignorance? Or, the "black power" preachers whose followers get all worked up when some racist shit-for-brains kills a black person for nothing other than race? The same standard must be applied to all, without fear or favour. When it can be shown that the intent was to knowingly provoke violence, then the person responsible ought to have to account for his/her words and actions to justice. But, Pastor Jackwagon here wouldn't be provoking violence with his stupidity if those that would react hadn't already been "indoctrinated" to do so. I guess what you're saying is to make sure it's known that you're followers "know what to do," so that anything that incites them is no longer on you.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|