Edwynn
Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008 Status: offline
|
A three year old child somehow got ahold of her father's gun, investigated the contraption as a child normally would, and the loaded gun with safety off happened to fire at a very wrong time. Her investigation ended there. This isn't about anti-gun, it's about anti-stupidity and criminal negligence. The criminal negligence demonstrated by those who foisted this law allowing guns into national parks in the first place. But somehow it has come about in the US that any measure against anti-stupidity equates to 'anti-gun,' or an attack against 'freedom.' When it get's to the point that loss of innocent life is held to be in support of 'freedom,' then I think there is some reassessment of that (by such standard) warped concept that might be in order. Anyone should be allowed to have a firearm within their own premises, which is the notion in the US and several other countries. I've never argued with that, though I don't feel the need to go to that extent myself. But the congressman who foisted this law of public carry in national parks is most assuredly NOT looking out for the safety of his constituents, howevermuch the NRA that paid for his election says otherwise. The gun that this three year old girl was playing with could have gone off while pointed in who-knows-what direction, which could have resulted in an even greater tragedy of the gun going off while inadvertently aimed at another child in the same crowded campground, and the girl having to live with that for the rest of her life. Yellowstone National Park is NOT Chicago or NYC, and it was completely senseless that Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) shoehorned this amendment/rider into a credit card law three years ago, same year as the child was born. Yeah, that guy was looking out for this girl's future, wasn't he? What crime spree was going on in Yellowstone to provoke such response from this Senator? None. What was he paid by the NRA? Plenty. This isn't an anti-gun diatribe. I've made that clear. Anyone can defend their castle however they wish. This is an anti-stupid and anti-contraDarwinist epistle. Any Senator that foists this insanity upon society needs to be pointed out. Sen Coburn needs to take responsibility for endangering society. If this law is not rescinded soon, then the next three yr. old getting hands on his/her daddy's gun might accidentally shoot another adult or child outside the family. This took place in a popular and crowded camp ground. A campground with no significant history of bear attacks or any history at all of crime. If you are worried enough about bear attacks, then don't go that national or state park. But if you do go there, don't force the rest of the people in that park to deal with your ineptitude regarding your gun and your child. That is NOT a 'request,' however Sen. Coburn or the NRA might take it otherwise. I didn't pay Sen. Cocksucker, and I'm not going to, so forget me out-bidding the NRA on that one. Eight out of ten gun owners (of many) that I've known in my life cause me not much worry, the CC types long before legalization of that included. Whereas the vast majority of those in this and other 'forums' almost make me want to get a gun and shoot you on sight, for sake of humanity, if not for evolution. But you won't win. I am still with out a weapon, and likely will always be, so no need for worry from my quarter. But you really need to look out for your own kids better, even if you don't give a flying frap about anybody else's kids. Sen. Cocksucker most assuredly doesn't give a frap about you OR your kids, the NRA saw to that. So it's up to you, then.
< Message edited by Edwynn -- 9/12/2013 6:54:14 AM >
|