Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone - 9/12/2013 9:15:24 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
quote:

ORIGINAL: yourdarkdesire
And that would be the end of your thread jlf, because the problem with the US is that you don't HAVE any gun control.

Gun control means using both hands.


I thought you were supposed to lean back and to one side, gun arm pointed straight out and gun turned on it's side?


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone - 9/12/2013 9:19:41 AM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline

"due to her utterly irresponsible parents"

Ok , now that we've got that bit of your lack of reading skills out of the way ...

I didn't say that a three yr. old who wound up with a loaded gun in her hands with one in the chamber and the safety off would or should be held accountable for whatever happens from that point on.

But humans are humans, and most humans would have felt very badly about an accident that resulted in the death of another.

She might have hated her parents forever too, for allowing the chance for such accident to begin with, but that still wouldn't prevent most normal humans from feeling terrible about it.

Sorry, no 'la dee da' outcome from this one, regardless who got shot or who (the parents) allowed it to happen.


(in reply to SlipSlidingAway)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone - 9/12/2013 9:23:13 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
quote:

ORIGINAL: yourdarkdesire
And that would be the end of your thread jlf, because the problem with the US is that you don't HAVE any gun control.

Gun control means using both hands.


I thought you were supposed to lean back and to one side, gun arm pointed straight out and gun turned on it's side?



That's okay, if you're a lefty. If you're a righty, you run the risk of continual stove piping (with the exception of some Steyr-Augs)

< Message edited by DaddySatyr -- 9/12/2013 9:27:48 AM >


_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone - 9/12/2013 9:23:49 AM   
SlipSlidingAway


Posts: 223
Joined: 11/24/2006
Status: offline
They did indeed and should be held accountable for it beyond any doubt. But, the dead child still deserves just as much sympathy as anyone else she might have injured. To say you would feel "more sorry" if it was someone else who died because of her parent's stupidity is very difficult for me to wrap my mind around. And, honestly, I'm okay with that. The bottom line is a dead kid.

_____________________________

"...ethical behavior should be based...on sympathy, education, and social ties; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death. " —Albert Einstein

(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone - 9/12/2013 9:31:19 AM   
MasterCaneman


Posts: 3842
Joined: 3/21/2013
Status: offline
I agree it was a tragedy that a little girl died because someone was negligent. A hard lesson to learn for sure. But out in the wild, especially now, having a weapon is once again becoming necessary. Others have shown you that crime in national parks is going up, and while attacks by wild animals aren't a major issue, there are other animals out there to be concerned of.

Number one is our fellow man. Homo sapiens in an apex predator, and certain members of this species has no problem in preying on their own kind. I've had my campsite robbed once while out rockclimbing, and had a friend who was robbed at gunpoint in a state park by one of the hermits who lived up there. Criminals like it when their victims are not only unable to call for help, but even if they can, that help may be hours or days away.

Number two is man's best friend, once they go wild. Feral dogs are menaces to people and wildlife alike. Unlike wolves or coyotes, they have no fear of man, especially if they're abandoned or runaways. They're loud, impetuous, sloppy killers who will cause harm if they can get to you. When I was a teen, I had a pack tree me until they got bored. After that, I never set foot in the wild again without a firearm of some sort.

Even back in the '80s, there were warnings about not messing with illegal grow operations in the parks and wilderness areas I visited. Some of those people have no problem with boobytraps and ambushing people who stumble across their sites. Being able to fight back is definitely not something they want to deal with, and I wouldn't be surprised if at some level they are trying to affect the rules regarding personal weapons in the parks. The rules don't apply to them, after all. They're criminals, and they'll carry what they please no matter what. It's only fair to level the playing field for the people who are paying for that park to be able to use it.

It's called "The Wilderness" for a reason.

_____________________________

Age and treachery will always overcome youth and ambition.

The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. ~ Sun Tzu

Goddess Wrangler



(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone - 9/12/2013 9:37:44 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

A three year old child somehow got ahold of her father's gun, investigated the contraption as a child normally would, and the loaded gun with safety off happened to fire at a very wrong time.

I've been scouring the news, and I see nothing of the kind anywhere. The mother called 911 to report that her daughter had "shot herself". Period. There appear to be no witnessess. And except for it being her father's pistol, how it happened, and what exactly happened, remains unresolved in every news source I can find.

As far as I can tell, your whole touching story about her somehow getting hold of her father's gun, investigating it as a child normally would, the safety being off, etc., is a complete and total fabrication.

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 9/12/2013 9:47:34 AM >

(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone - 9/12/2013 9:46:44 AM   
BitYakin


Posts: 882
Joined: 10/15/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

A three year old child somehow got ahold of her father's gun, investigated the contraption as a child normally would, and the loaded gun with safety off happened to fire at a very wrong time.

I've been scouring the news, and I see nothing of the kind anywhere. The mother called 911 to report that her daughter had "shot herself". Period. There appear to be no witnessess. And except for it being her father's pistol, how it happened, and what exactly happened, remains unresolved in every news source I can find.

As far as I can tell, your whole touching story about her somehow getting hold of her father's gun, investigating it as a child normally would, the safety being off, etc., is a complete and total fabrication.

K.




HAHAHAH thats funny, and I recall him saying I have clearly pointed out this is NOT AN ANTI GUN DIATRIBE, now we find he ELABORATED beyond the FACTS to push his ANTI GUN VIEWS

when will people realize that when you take a factual account then surround it with fabrications to support your agenda all you do is make the other side look right

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone - 9/12/2013 9:55:10 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
The 1911 that I keep handy for home defense is kept where only an adult over 5'7" can reach. The other 1911 I own that I carry on my person gets the mag pulled when I come into the house and the chamber cleared.


As an Assistant Coach for my son's U-13 baseball team (13 or under at the cutoff date), I can attest that your "storage" spot is not adequate to prevent those who aren't "adults" from reaching them. Well, unless you have someone there checking ID's.

And, this is more a comment on the relative heights of some of the kids my son's team has to play against. I'm 5'11 and I'm not always taller than his competitors.



At present, the only children in that come into the house are 3 ft and 4 ft respectively. Unfortunately, if the weapon was any higher, my niece who is 5'7 would be SOL if she needed it.

Although I honestly think that if anyone broke into the house with or without the family present, Princess might get a bit irate over the intrusion. Since my great nephew was born she has gotten very territorial and protective of him. We literally have to introduce new friends to her, otherwise she wont let them in the house.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone - 9/12/2013 9:57:39 AM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterCaneman

I agree it was a tragedy that a little girl died because someone was negligent. A hard lesson to learn for sure. But out in the wild, especially now, having a weapon is once again becoming necessary. Others have shown you that crime in national parks is going up, and while attacks by wild animals aren't a major issue, there are other animals out there to be concerned of...

Oh Christ, people!

This was a crowded public park!

It could have been anywhere, it was just another very popular and well facilitated and entirely catered to moms and pops and the kids just wanting to smell the roses for a day or three. This isn't the Mexican border, this isn't Big Ben Alaskan Yukon Denalli whatever. It's a fancy picnic site where you can picnic for three days if you like.


quote:

Number one is our fellow man. Homo sapiens in an apex predator, and certain members of this species has no problem in preying on their own kind. I've had my campsite robbed once while out rockclimbing, and had a friend who was robbed at gunpoint in a state park by one of the hermits who lived up there. Criminals like it when their victims are not only unable to call for help, but even if they can, that help may be hours or days away.

Number two is man's best friend, once they go wild. Feral dogs are menaces to people and wildlife alike. Unlike wolves or coyotes, they have no fear of man, especially if they're abandoned or runaways. They're loud, impetuous, sloppy killers who will cause harm if they can get to you. When I was a teen, I had a pack tree me until they got bored. After that, I never set foot in the wild again without a firearm of some sort.

Even back in the '80s, there were warnings about not messing with illegal grow operations in the parks and wilderness areas I visited. Some of those people have no problem with boobytraps and ambushing people who stumble across their sites. Being able to fight back is definitely not something they want to deal with, and I wouldn't be surprised if at some level they are trying to affect the rules regarding personal weapons in the parks. The rules don't apply to them, after all. They're criminals, and they'll carry what they please no matter what. It's only fair to level the playing field for the people who are paying for that park to be able to use it.

It's called "The Wilderness" for a reason.



Here we go again, trying to drag Southside Chicago into every discussion.

Some people are just scared shitless of just about anything; wilderness, dogs, black people, whatever. You can have it, but no thanks, here.

I've been robbed and broken into on several occasions.

I'm not a wimp. The fuck with me being a 'victim.' I deal. I change patterns and methods and neighborhoods. I don't get robbed anymore. Simple.

I've taken the nephews and nieces on numerous outdoor ventures, never an issue.

Stay at least 800 miles away from Chi. or NYC, set the tent under small trees to lessen the rain, away from large trees to not get electrocuted by lighting, and we all have a great time, even when in thunder and downpour deluge. That's all there is to it.

I didn't take them near bears or hunting grounds, not difficult.

If I were to take them to Alaska, I'd hire a guide with a rifle, but I didn't take them to Alaska.

Simple as that.

Read that again: my six yr. old niece (at the time) would never have had any possible access to a gun of any sort, whatever the situation.



< Message edited by Edwynn -- 9/12/2013 10:06:46 AM >

(in reply to MasterCaneman)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone - 9/12/2013 10:03:22 AM   
MasterCaneman


Posts: 3842
Joined: 3/21/2013
Status: offline
You can do as you please. Just don't tell me what to do or what I can legally possess is all I ask. If you don't like guns, fine. Don't own one. But don't extend that belief to include others.

When I go out in the woods, I don't "fear" bears. Yes, we have 'em here quite near to where I live (black bear), but as long as you don't mess with them, they won't mess with you. I'm more concerned about the other apex predator that roams the woods nowadays.

And how did you extrapolate the southside of Chicago into what I said? That's the one that perplexes me.

_____________________________

Age and treachery will always overcome youth and ambition.

The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. ~ Sun Tzu

Goddess Wrangler



(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone - 9/12/2013 10:36:12 AM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

A three year old child somehow got ahold of her father's gun, investigated the contraption as a child normally would, and the loaded gun with safety off happened to fire at a very wrong time.

I've been scouring the news, and I see nothing of the kind anywhere. The mother called 911 to report that her daughter had "shot herself". Period. There appear to be no witnessess. And except for it being her father's pistol, how it happened, and what exactly happened, remains unresolved in every news source I can find.

As far as I can tell, your whole touching story about her somehow getting hold of her father's gun, investigating it as a child normally would, the safety being off, etc., is a complete and total fabrication.

K.



The official accounts, from numerous sources quoting the authorities, is that a three yr. old girl was shot, and that the gun belonged to her father, and that the mother called the rangers and said that the girl shot herself.

It might have been that either the mother or the father actually shot her. You seem to be quite excited about that prospect, but if anything it just reinforces the fact that allowing people with guns into public places has a greater tendency to not work out well for anyone.

In any case, you seem to have better sources, so perhaps you could expound on the apparently non-fabricated Mexican immigrant connection to this incident that you alluded to earlier.

I mean, going after the most creditable sources and all that.





< Message edited by Edwynn -- 9/12/2013 11:15:55 AM >

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone - 9/12/2013 11:23:24 AM   
VideoAdminChi


Posts: 3086
Joined: 8/6/2012
Status: offline
FR,

Please refrain from making personal attacks on other users. When you find yourself about to respond to another user with a personal attack, please take a few minutes to regain your composure before posting. Strong opinions are allowed and passionate discussion is sure to occur, but when the posts turn away from the topic and towards the poster, we must call a halt.

(in reply to MasterCaneman)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone - 9/12/2013 12:17:18 PM   
papassion


Posts: 487
Joined: 3/28/2012
Status: offline
How many people are accidently killed by guns per year in the US? How many people are accidently killed by medical errors per year in the US? With these statistics, the anti-gun crowd should be protesting hospitals!

(in reply to VideoAdminChi)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone - 9/12/2013 12:32:07 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
~FR~

The parent that left the gun in such a condition, without being safely stowed, should face severe criminal charges. If there are no laws in a state that cover this type of neglect, endangering or felony homicide, then those states should pass such laws so that stupidity that results in death or severe injury is given strict criminal punishment. Combined with any jail time or fine, the individual should not be allowed to own or have in their place of residence, firearms of any type.

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone - 9/12/2013 1:09:51 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
I see. So, since the other thread had to be shut down for violations, we now have this one. Alrighty, then.

I guess I should repeat what I said on the other thread first. I absolutely have sympathy for what happened to this little girl. I can not imagine what the parents are going to have to live with for the rest of their lives concerning their own guilt.

Still, it wouldn't change anything regarding whether or not people need to protect themselves from wildlife. The "crowded public park" that keeps getting mentioned doesn't have some invisible force field around the campgrounds so that the bears, moose, coyotes, bobcats, and wolves don't tread. It's Yellowstone, not Disneyland. All of the fuming about how it could have happened and a three year old discharging the weapon so that it would have killed a bystander just doesn't seem as that much of a likely scenario.

I'd actually be in favor of laws that would cover this kind of negligence. That way, the people who were directly responsible for this (the irresponsible gun owner) are held accountable and not every person who feels they need a weapon for protection.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone - 9/12/2013 1:13:51 PM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

~FR~

The parent that left the gun in such a condition, without being safely stowed, should face severe criminal charges.

Negligent manslaughter would certainly apply to this situation.

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone - 9/12/2013 2:05:54 PM   
igor2003


Posts: 1718
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterCaneman

I agree it was a tragedy that a little girl died because someone was negligent. A hard lesson to learn for sure. But out in the wild, especially now, having a weapon is once again becoming necessary. Others have shown you that crime in national parks is going up, and while attacks by wild animals aren't a major issue, there are other animals out there to be concerned of...

Oh Christ, people!

This was a crowded public park!

It could have been anywhere, it was just another very popular and well facilitated and entirely catered to moms and pops and the kids just wanting to smell the roses for a day or three. This isn't the Mexican border, this isn't Big Ben Alaskan Yukon Denalli whatever. It's a fancy picnic site where you can picnic for three days if you like.


quote:

Number one is our fellow man. Homo sapiens in an apex predator, and certain members of this species has no problem in preying on their own kind. I've had my campsite robbed once while out rockclimbing, and had a friend who was robbed at gunpoint in a state park by one of the hermits who lived up there. Criminals like it when their victims are not only unable to call for help, but even if they can, that help may be hours or days away.

Number two is man's best friend, once they go wild. Feral dogs are menaces to people and wildlife alike. Unlike wolves or coyotes, they have no fear of man, especially if they're abandoned or runaways. They're loud, impetuous, sloppy killers who will cause harm if they can get to you. When I was a teen, I had a pack tree me until they got bored. After that, I never set foot in the wild again without a firearm of some sort.

Even back in the '80s, there were warnings about not messing with illegal grow operations in the parks and wilderness areas I visited. Some of those people have no problem with boobytraps and ambushing people who stumble across their sites. Being able to fight back is definitely not something they want to deal with, and I wouldn't be surprised if at some level they are trying to affect the rules regarding personal weapons in the parks. The rules don't apply to them, after all. They're criminals, and they'll carry what they please no matter what. It's only fair to level the playing field for the people who are paying for that park to be able to use it.

It's called "The Wilderness" for a reason.



Here we go again, trying to drag Southside Chicago into every discussion.

Some people are just scared shitless of just about anything; wilderness, dogs, black people, whatever. You can have it, but no thanks, here.

I've been robbed and broken into on several occasions.

I'm not a wimp. The fuck with me being a 'victim.' I deal. I change patterns and methods and neighborhoods. I don't get robbed anymore. Simple.

I've taken the nephews and nieces on numerous outdoor ventures, never an issue.

Stay at least 800 miles away from Chi. or NYC, set the tent under small trees to lessen the rain, away from large trees to not get electrocuted by lighting, and we all have a great time, even when in thunder and downpour deluge. That's all there is to it.

I didn't take them near bears or hunting grounds, not difficult.

If I were to take them to Alaska, I'd hire a guide with a rifle, but I didn't take them to Alaska.

Simple as that.

Read that again: my six yr. old niece (at the time) would never have had any possible access to a gun of any sort, whatever the situation.




I’m not going to drag in the south side of Chicago. I am, however going to drag in Atlanta, Georgia since that is where your profile says you are located.

In 2011 Atlanta had less than 500,000 residents. In 2010 Atlanta had 93 murders. Admittedly, I don’t know how many of those were committed with a firearm. You say you have been the victim of crime in the past and that you have moved at times to feel safe. But the city you choose to live in had 93 murders in one year, in a city of less than 500,000.

Now you are whining and carrying on about how unsafe this law is that has allowed firearms to be brought into Yellowstone. Yellowstone has about 3,000,000 visitors per year. In the three years since the law in question came into effect that is about 9,000,000 people. Out of those 9,000,000 people there has been…one…accidental death due to a firearm.

It sounds to me like you should move to Yellowstone.




_____________________________

If the women don't find you handsome they should at least find you handy. - Red Green

At my age erections are like cops...there's never one around when you need it!

Never miss a good chance to shut up. - Will Rogers


(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone - 9/12/2013 3:27:51 PM   
slavekate80


Posts: 362
Joined: 7/4/2013
Status: offline
The only stupidity here is the gun owner leaving it loaded within reach of a child who doesn't yet have the mental capacity to understand why she needs to stay away from it. If someone leaves a sharp kitchen knife in reach of a small child who stabs himself or someone else with it, is the answer more regulation of knives? If someone leaves bleach out and a small child drinks it, do we need more regulation and government safety measures for bleach and various household chemicals? Probably not. The adult in charge may be guilty of negligence, but it's that person who didn't live up to his responsibility, not everyone else. No need to make things tougher for the responsible, law-abiding citizens who are appropriately diligent.

I don't particularly like guns. I don't have one, and I would prefer to stay gun-free in the future as well. But I don't have a problem with other people carrying them. Prosecute people who commit crimes with guns or commit acts of gun-related criminal negligence. Leave everybody else alone. If we start taking away everything that can possibly be used to kill someone intentionally or accidentally, we'll be cutting our steaks with children's safety scissors and washing our clothes in plain lukewarm water. Until someone drowns in the washtub.

(in reply to igor2003)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone - 9/12/2013 4:02:01 PM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: slavekate80

The only stupidity here is the gun owner leaving it loaded within reach of a child who doesn't yet have the mental capacity to understand why she needs to stay away from it. If someone leaves a sharp kitchen knife in reach of a small child who stabs himself or someone else with it, is the answer more regulation of knives? If someone leaves bleach out and a small child drinks it, do we need more regulation and government safety measures for bleach and various household chemicals? Probably not. The adult in charge may be guilty of negligence, but it's that person who didn't live up to his responsibility, not everyone else. No need to make things tougher for the responsible, law-abiding citizens who are appropriately diligent.

I'm sorry, but that kind of sensible logic simply has no place here.

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to slavekate80)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone - 9/12/2013 5:30:29 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

A three year old child somehow got ahold of her father's gun, investigated the contraption as a child normally would, and the loaded gun with safety off happened to fire at a very wrong time.

I've been scouring the news, and I see nothing of the kind anywhere. The mother called 911 to report that her daughter had "shot herself". Period. There appear to be no witnessess. And except for it being her father's pistol, how it happened, and what exactly happened, remains unresolved in every news source I can find.

As far as I can tell, your whole touching story about her somehow getting hold of her father's gun, investigating it as a child normally would, the safety being off, etc., is a complete and total fabrication.

K.



The official accounts, from numerous sources quoting the authorities, is that a three yr. old girl was shot, and that the gun belonged to her father, and that the mother called the rangers and said that the girl shot herself.

It might have been that either the mother or the father actually shot her. You seem to be quite excited about that prospect, but if anything it just reinforces the fact that allowing people with guns into public places has a greater tendency to not work out well for anyone.

In any case, you seem to have better sources, so perhaps you could expound on the apparently non-fabricated Mexican immigrant connection to this incident that you alluded to earlier.

I mean, going after the most creditable sources and all that.


Yes, that is what the official accounts say which makes me wonder also why you posted the little story you did implying anyone has a clue what really happened. Of course you also said K was excited about the prospect that one of the parents shot her and he said nothing of the kind so maybe you just enjoy telling stories.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: toddler shoots self in Yellowstone Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109