Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

US's newest property?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> US's newest property? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
US's newest property? - 9/18/2013 9:51:51 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
http://news.yahoo.com/us-seize-york-skyscraper-secretly-owned-iran-015924951.html

    quote:

    The United States is set seize control of a midtown Manhattan skyscraper prosecutors claim is secretly owned by Iran, the justice department said, though the ruling is to be appealed.

    The seizure and sale of the 36-story building, in the heart of New York City on Fifth Avenue, would be "the largest-ever terrorism-related forfeiture," the statement added.

    A federal judge ruled in favor of the government's suit this week, saying the building's owners had violated Iran sanctions and money laundering laws.

    Manhattan Federal Prosecutor Preet Bharara said the decision upholds the justice department claims the owner of the building "was (and is) a front for Bank Melli, and thus a front for the Government of Iran."

    Bharara said the funds from selling the building would provide "a means of compensating victims of Iranian-sponsored terrorism."

    Prosecutors allege the building's owners, the Alavi Foundation and Assa Corporation, transferred rental income and other funds to Iran's state-owned Bank Melli.

    Alavi also ran a charitable organization for Iran and managed the building for the Iranian government, the statement said.

    Built in the 1970s by a non-profit operated by the Shah of Iran -- and financed with a Bank Melli loan -- the building was expropriated by the new Iranian government after the 1979 revolution, prosecutors allege.

    They said the Shah's non-profit, the Pahlavi Foundation, was renamed the Mostazafan Foundation of New York and then the Alavi Foundation.

    A former president of the Alavi foundation pleaded guilty in 2009 to obstructing justice in destroying evidence related to the case, which was first filed in 2008.

    The Alavi foundation plans to appeal, saying on its website it was "disappointed" with the ruling and that "it did not have the opportunity to rebut the Government evidence before a jury."

    The US Treasury Department has instituted tight sanctions against Iran, blacklisting a number of Iranian companies and organizations and putting controls on the ability of any group or business to transfer funds into Iran.

    The restrictions seek to pressure Tehran into giving up what the West says is a program to develop nuclear weapons.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: US's newest property? - 9/18/2013 10:09:03 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
But what about the free market?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: US's newest property? - 9/18/2013 5:17:12 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
"Built in the 1970s by a non-profit operated by the Shah of Iran -- and financed with a Bank Melli loan -- the building was expropriated by the new Iranian government after the 1979 revolution, prosecutors allege."

Seems a case of it is okay if you are our dictator ?

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: US's newest property? - 9/18/2013 8:05:17 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
"Built in the 1970s by a non-profit operated by the Shah of Iran -- and financed with a Bank Melli loan -- the building was expropriated by the new Iranian government after the 1979 revolution, prosecutors allege."
Seems a case of it is okay if you are our dictator ?


I'm not sure what you're saying, Polite.

I haven't decided yet if I'm in support of this action or not. I'm leaning towards the claims that the two owners were fronts for Bank Melli and Iran a bit specious. I think this is just another example of heavy-handed abuse of standard operating procedures. It's one thing to confiscate things actually used by perps in the commission of a crime, but to abuse the system and take property (real estate and other property) from someone simply because a crime was committed, or thought to have been committed, when the owner had nothing to do with the crime.

According to the story, the two owners transferred rental and other monies to Bank Melli. Since Bank Melli is state-owned, it's a violation of Iran sanctions and money-laundering laws.

Another red flag that popped up, for me, was that, according to the Alavi Foundation (one owner), there was no opportunity for rebuttal of the accusations to a jury. That smacks of opportunism and abuse.

I hope this gets sorted out properly and justice is served. I also hope that our Justice Dept. acted properly in this.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: US's newest property? - 9/19/2013 4:35:18 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
When the dictator in Iran was a friend of the US, things were fine, now not so much.

The problem with the west as a whole and dictators, is a lack of consistency.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: US's newest property? - 9/19/2013 5:11:55 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
When the dictator in Iran was a friend of the US, things were fine, now not so much.
The problem with the west as a whole and dictators, is a lack of consistency.


Gotcha. Thanks for the clarification.

The dictator in Iran hasn't been our friend for many years, though. If this is really such a big issue, why now? I get that we are trying to ratchet the pressure up, but where do we come up with this stuff?

http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/Documents/iran.pdf

Pulled that from our Treasury Dept. website just now. Forfeiture of property doesn't seem to be on the list...



_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: US's newest property? - 9/19/2013 5:20:48 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
I can only think they are citing money laundering or arming terrorists. Again, it is a cse of one mans terrorist etc.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: US's newest property? - 9/19/2013 1:27:30 PM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline
If there was ever an appropriate time to seize the building it seems to me it would have been in 1979. However, if they can prove some kind of link to terrorist activity then I don't see a problem with it. As it is, I don't think it's much more than an attempt to kick Iran in the nuts and give them some bad press.

_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: US's newest property? - 9/19/2013 1:40:33 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny
If there was ever an appropriate time to seize the building it seems to me it would have been in 1979. However, if they can prove some kind of link to terrorist activity then I don't see a problem with it. As it is, I don't think it's much more than an attempt to kick Iran in the nuts and give them some bad press.


"them" being Iran, or the two organizations that own(ed) the building?

Iran isn't getting any bad press out of this. The two organizations will, but I haven't seen any proof that what they did was immoral or wrong, other than the Justice Dept. claiming it is.

The only ones truly getting bad press out of this will be the Justice Dept. and possibly the Obama Administration (where the buck stops). It doesn't seem to me that they are fairly applying the law.

But, like I said, I hope justice wins out and that our Justice Dept. is shown to have acted properly.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 9
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> US's newest property? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063