Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: two things.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: two things. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: two things. - 9/20/2013 1:29:12 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
And I showed that the incorrect 28k figure would be 40k, but that is just sequestration of government employees. Not including contractors.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: two things. - 9/20/2013 3:37:33 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
You do realize that you haven't answered any questions or cited anything that shows that millions of people would suddenly be out of work. Nor have you cited anything that shows what that effect would have on the economy.

If the federal government does not have a budget it has no authorization to spend money on payroll. When that happens the only federal employees even allowed to come into work are those deemed essential and the only way any of them get paid for that time is if when the spending authorization is finally passed it includes a special provision authorizing that pay. do you really think the Republicans in the House would pass such a measure?
If you have any actual questions why not ask them? All you've done in response to my posts is demand links to fairly obvious information.


I have asked questions (asking for citations is neither demanding nor is it not asking questions). You continue to talk in platitudes and refer to stuff that could be very credible. But, you have no proof it is. Therein lies your issue.

MN went on about sequestration already having an effect. I showed government employment had dropped slightly, but that when compared to the previous year, it was almost non-existent. And, on top of all that, private employment continued to rise well beyond what was cut (even taking the assumption that all 28k jobs lost were due to sequestration).

I put the numbers on the page. I tried to put the graphs on the page, too, but that didn't work for some reason.


What proof is needed? That nonessential federal employees won't work in the case of a shutdown? That those same employees won't get paid without a special provision once the shutdown is over?

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: two things. - 9/20/2013 4:13:42 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
What proof is needed? That nonessential federal employees won't work in the case of a shutdown? That those same employees won't get paid without a special provision once the shutdown is over?


Proof of how many people will be sidelined and that it will impact the economy in the long term.




_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: two things. - 9/20/2013 4:33:30 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

And I showed that the incorrect 28k figure would be 40k, but that is just sequestration of government employees. Not including contractors.


Well, there was a debate about the 28k figure, some felt it was 16k, some felt it was a 23 - 47k figure....some have concerns that there is debate on the figures that run between 7k and 74k (plus or minus 22k)....I however feel that the numbers fall somewhere in between.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 64
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: two things. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063