RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


thompsonx -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/5/2013 11:47:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA



Dude, when was the last time a major medical discovery was made in Italy? When was the last time Italy sent a man to the moon? When was the last time Italy moved the art world, the business world, or the information world? It doesn't because when you are subject to group think you can't see outside your group.


When was the last time a group was not responsble for a major medical discovery?
When was the last time a group was not responsible for sending a man to the moon?
When was the last time a group was not resposible for moving the art world?
When was the last time a group was not responsible for a major development in the business world?
When was the last time a group was not responsible for a major development in the information world?
Anyone who thinks individuals did a fucking thing in the history of the motherfucking world are????how shall I put this discreetly????
Less than informed or just plane fucking stupid.




thompsonx -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/5/2013 11:53:50 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA



When the Iron Curtain fell people in East Germany lost will and yearned to be placed back under a Stalinistic yoke.

The fact that they were a conquored nation had nothing to do with this???[8|]


For decades they didnt do well and became a burdon on Europe.

According to the history books e. germany was one of the ten largest economies in europe after the wall was built.
I have heard that google is some place that the ignorant can go to disabuse themselves for a while[;)]






thompsonx -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/5/2013 12:00:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

Bama, when debating with post modern thinking people, such as socialists, keep in mind that its a made up philosophy that rejects all human historical learning. They pride themselves on "seeing the world differently". Then what usually happens when they force a new governance system in place, it will always fail because it never takes into consideration human nature. But, usually when the system fails the post modern implementor is miles down the road and no longer interested. How they wreck society is less interesting to them than inflicting control on society. Name me one post modern system that did what it intended?

Define what the fuck you mean by "post modern system"


Eulero only can attack individualism by attributing it to the Wild West and never acknowledging who put a man on the moon.

Were they the same ones who put the first satellite into outer space?





BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/5/2013 12:18:33 PM)

If you follow Bama's opinion, the US soldiers won WWII.
But, true, government killings appear to be acceptable for most people, unfortunately.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You just love to take cheap shots to misrepresent me don't you?




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/5/2013 12:20:03 PM)

Whilst the rates are slowly reducing

_____________________________________________________

50% in 20 years is not a slow drop.




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/5/2013 12:22:02 PM)

Although if you look at our past, in the 20's when our gun controls were introduced, we also had something in our constitution that should have been debated and arguably had a referendum on it, theyt just simply swept it aside and enacted the gun control laws.
So it doesn't always take a lot of debate.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
we value our consttution




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/5/2013 12:23:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63

Then there was World War II, in which a lot of mass killing occurred in Central Europe. During the Cold War, there were a number of people shot trying to escape from behind the Iron Curtain, not to mention the atrocities committed by the regimes involved.

But since those were killings perpetrated by governments, I guess those are considered "good killings" in the eyes of Europeans, since governments can do no wrong.


I stopped answering because HunterCA is just writing random sentences that have only rhetorical value, but I want to make a point about this.
After WWII European culture changed a lot, for an example italian republic's costitution is dated 1946, and it's wrote so that our governament will never perpetrate such killings for example our governament can't declare war first, just defend if directly attacked or help an allied. About what happened on the other side of the iron curtain we were on the same side as you of that wall and I don't know where you heard that were good killings for europeans.


We wrote it for you.




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/5/2013 12:31:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA


quote:

ORIGINAL: eulero83

I answer in a single post, criminals want money and organized crime secure its source of money by controlling the territory, three things make it easier for them: individualism of people that think they can defend by their own and don't care about others, easy access to guns and a low rate of uniformed police officers patrolling the streets, than social degrade is fertile ground for the growing of new criminals, as you said that kind of distorted values exist only in that subcultures but there must be a reason if people end to accept that rules.



Eulero, your subjugation by the state is so intense you fear individualism. You fear not having a controlling nanny state. And because you fear you lash out at what makes you afraid. We saw the same thing when the individualistic US Army liberated all of Europe and especially the European Concentration Camps during WWII. I think they call it the Stockholm Syndrome now. You can't see what your owners have done to you so you're really not worth debating.


HunterCA well you have shown yourself to be wrong, first off the US Army did not liberated ALL of Europe, They got as far as Austria, the British and Russian liberated a lot of Concentration of Camps as well. As to the Stockholm Syndrome it was actually called "Norrmalmstorgssyndromet" by the criminologist and psychiatrist Nils Bejerot. It become known as the Stockholm Syndrome after an attempted bank robbery in Stockholm in 1973. The FBI has reported that is may effect some 27% of those taken hostage. Now as to Italy chew on this.

On September 25, 2001, US Congress passed a resolution that officially recognized the Florentine immigrant to the United States, Antonio Meucci, as the inventor of the telephone.

Giulio Natta, Nobel prize for the polymerization of plastics.

Guglielmo Marconi, who received the Nobel Prize in Physics for the invention of radio.


Wow, I am so pleased you find me wrong. I can stop worrying now. It shows I'm on the side to truth, justice and the American way. Oh, and Patton was forced to stop and allow the Soviets to take Berlin. But, the Soviets didnt liberate Europe. They just changed one socialist dictator for another. It took until Reagan to finally bring the evil empire down. And, that was with US troops on the wall all of the time.


You are missed informed. Patton was not forced to stop and allow the Soviets to take Berlin. His line of March was far to south of Berlin. General Eisenhower lost interest in the race to Berlin and made no plans for Berlin. Romania at the time of World War 2 was a Constitutional Monarchy, under King Carol II. Poland was a military dictatorship, Czechoslovakia was a democratic elected government, sorry no socialist dictators as you claim. And as to the fall of the Berlin Wall, no US troops were involved, just unarmed civilians.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MM2qq5J5A1s




With your usual contact with reality you failed to notice that the soviets took that territory from the Nazis (National Socialists)  




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/5/2013 12:34:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
You just love to take cheap shots to misrepresent me don't you?

You made the statement, not me.
In fact, you gloated over it, and more than once I might add.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
50% in 20 years is not a slow drop.

The UK and Australia did much more than that overnight.
So I'd call that incredibly slow.
And I didn't see in anything I read that it was as high as 50% nationwide.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
We wrote it for you.

You honestly think that?
According to people I speak to here, including relatives that lived through it, the Americans usually turned up late, did their bit, flirted with anything in a skirt, and fucked off as fast as they arrived.

Nobody can remember the US actually writing anything constitutionally for any of the European countries.




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/5/2013 12:35:42 PM)

But, since those laws were introduced, gun related deaths just plummeted through the floor and never rose again.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

They were already in the basement.




thompsonx -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/5/2013 12:35:43 PM)

It's funny, one of the foundation principals of socialism is that the masses are to ignorant to be able to govern themselves and they must be governed by the intellectual elite.

That is called a republic. You know where the people "elect" from an aproved list of candidates those who will govern them.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/5/2013 12:39:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

But, since those laws were introduced, gun related deaths just plummeted through the floor and never rose again.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

They were already in the basement.

Whislt that is true, compared to the previous levels (though nothing like in the US), they dropped considerably.





BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/5/2013 12:40:09 PM)

You made the statement, not me.
In fact, you gloated over it, and more than once I might add.


--------------------------------------------------
A totally inaccurate piece of fiction a stupid accusation as I have repeatedly pointed out.




thompsonx -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/5/2013 12:40:47 PM)

the soviets took that territory from the Nazis

I am prety sure they were at war with them.




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/5/2013 12:41:15 PM)

The UK and Australia did much more than that overnight.
So I'd call that incredibly slow.
And I didn't see in anything I read that it was as high as 50% nationwide.


-----------------------------------------------------------


You only work in fiction don't you




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/5/2013 12:43:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

You made the statement, not me.
In fact, you gloated over it, and more than once I might add.


--------------------------------------------------
A totally inaccurate piece of fiction a stupid accusation as I have repeatedly pointed out.

You have, in more than one post, across several threads, liked to tell me (and others) that the US won the wars and (implied) that we couldn't have done it without the US intervention.
Or is your memory that bad that you can't remember?




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/5/2013 12:44:36 PM)

You honestly think that?
According to people I speak to here, including relatives that lived through it, the Americans usually turned up late, did their bit, flirted with anything in a skirt, and fucked off as fast as they arrived.

Nobody can remember the US actually writing anything constitutionally for any of the European countries.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
The  Allies wrote the new constitutions for the Axis countries.
And now you are claiming the US had virtually nothing to do with the victory? That is absurd. 




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/5/2013 12:49:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

You made the statement, not me.
In fact, you gloated over it, and more than once I might add.


--------------------------------------------------
A totally inaccurate piece of fiction a stupid accusation as I have repeatedly pointed out.

You have, in more than one post, across several threads, liked to tell me (and others) that the US won the wars and (implied) that we couldn't have done it without the US intervention.
Or is your memory that bad that you can't remember?



No I didn't.
You seem not to be able to comprehend the difference between being a vital part of the effort, like England and the Soviet Union and winning it by ourselves.
The Allies might have lost with any of those key pieces missing.
As usual you remember what you want to believe instead of what actually happened. 




thompsonx -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/5/2013 12:52:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

Eulero, I was once engaged to a woman who when I met her was teaching philosophy at Harvard.

Yeah right...you do realize that it is possible to discover exactly how many women have taught philosophy at harvard[;)]

She was deeply inculcated in post modern philosophy. One day we were flying from Dubai to Singapore. When we landed I said the old pilots adage, "It's always nice to have as many landings as takeoffs.

I don't quite know how to break this to you but it is physically impossible to not have as many landing as takeoffs.

She, being a good post modern thinker, said, "that's not true I bet I can think of five different ways."

Perhaps you could validate for us somehow that this is a tennent of "post modern thinking"[8|]


I told her to go ahead. To which she came up with five different alternatives that would have killed everyone on board the plane. But, she was happy that she thought up five alternate worlds.


Perhaps you might share with us what your g/f thought were the five alternatives better than having as many landings as takeoffs?

And since she was my women I kissed her on the forehead and told her how smart she was.

Yeah I know profesional whores never kiss on the lips.

She was a smart girl, she spoke 36 languages.

Which language did she speak to you in?


The last time I debate with a guy with a Phd in post modern philosophy I, as an engineer, stated I preferred my modernistic thinking because basically when I built a water treatment plant when it was done I had to flip a switch and either it worked or it did not.


One would think that the water treatment plant would fail to work only if it had been built by a someone who only thought they were an engineer.


He said, "that's not true, I'll bet I can think of a different alternative." I told him to have at it, come up with an alternative. He did, he said, "You could flip the water treatment plant switch and get muddy water."

And that's how a socialist thinks. We need to make society conform to the existence of planes crashing and killing people and drinking muddy water so government can show how smart it is imposing new systems on the masses.

Actually that seems more like some moron making shit up.

After a time the masses acclimate to muddy water and extol the virtue of the group drinking muddy water.

Are you talking about albuquerque? That was whitman wasn't it? I thought she was a republicrat not a commie?




HunterCA -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (11/5/2013 1:06:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA
Help me if I'm wrong. I haven't checked this in years. But I do remember that violent crime was going down in Australia for a couple of decades until they enacted strict gun laws then they started to go up again. Largely rape and violent mugging since it was no longer expected that anyone would be able to defend themselves. I know violent crime increased for at least three years after confiscating all the guns and then I stopped checking.

I believe the same sort of thing happened in Britain.

And as I predicted, someone comes up with non-gun crimes in a gun thread.  [:D]



Actually, it's very relevant. All peer reviewed studies show that when the ability to carry guns is changed the nature of violent crime changes. More guns generates less rapes and muggings and increase property theft. Fewer guns available to people make violent crime go the other way. It makes sense if you are a criminal who suspects a victim may be armed that you're going to steal his car rather than confront him. Same for rapes.

Eulero did try to discuss violent crime, I give him that. He didnt state this aspect. You do have to look at crime as a whole to understand gun availability. Studies show that in the US when there are liberal gun rights, the incident of rape drops about 18 percent. So, we have a few gang bangers killing each other or rapes. I choose fewer rapes.




Page: <<   < prev  38 39 [40] 41 42   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625