Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment ***


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** Page: <<   < prev  50 51 [52] 53 54   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 11/6/2013 11:04:45 PM   
butternutsquash


Posts: 59
Joined: 11/5/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

read this
www.saf.org/LawReviews/KleckAndGertz1.htm


And I answer this again by pointing to an article from the American Journal of Public Health, which states that just having a gun in your possession increases your risk of being shot by a factor of up to 5.45.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2759797/

It's not a zero-sum game. You ultimately end up reducing the chances of anyone involved being shot if you just leave the gun at home.

< Message edited by butternutsquash -- 11/6/2013 11:05:49 PM >

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 1021
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 11/6/2013 11:05:36 PM   
HunterCA


Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

Please oh please take me.

You're going to be soooo embarrassed when you check my profile.

K.




Oh no Kirata, it's true love.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 1022
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 11/6/2013 11:08:31 PM   
HunterCA


Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007
Status: offline
Butterscotch, so man up, or panty up. Answer Bama and Kirata and knock me down.

(in reply to HunterCA)
Profile   Post #: 1023
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 11/6/2013 11:12:30 PM   
butternutsquash


Posts: 59
Joined: 11/5/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

Butterscotch, so man up, or panty up. Answer Bama and Kirata and knock me down.
I AM A GOD, MAN! DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND? I AM A FUCKING GOD!

I will answer Kirata when I see a serious argument BECAUSE THAT PERSON'S REASONING IS A BUNCH OF CORRELATIONAL GARBAGE UNFIT FOR TOILET PAPER.

(in reply to HunterCA)
Profile   Post #: 1024
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 11/6/2013 11:21:28 PM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: butternutsquash

You've had the evidence debunking this available to you for years.

However, the report of President Obama's Committee on Priorities for a Public Health Research Agenda to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence concluded:

Studies that directly assessed the effect of actual defensive uses of guns (i.e., incidents in which a gun was ‘used’ by the crime victim in the sense of attacking or threatening an offender) have found consistently lower injury rates among gun-using crime victims compared with victims who used other self-protective strategies. ~Source

It's always convenient to assume that studies with findings to your liking used appropriate measures and evaluated the data in a correct an unbiased manner. But needless to say, there are always other studies with different findings that claim to debunk the former. Sometimes you have to get your hands dirty and actually look for yourself. Let's take a case in point:

The State of Florida publishes crime statistics dating back to 1971. Florida became a "shall issue" concealed carry state in 1987. So we have 17 years of data before the law was passed, and 25 years of data since. In the years from 1971 to 1987 inclusive Florida's total crime rate rose 49.6%, violent crime went up 86.4%, and forcible rape offenses more than doubled.

When we compare 2012, the latest year for which data is available, to the 1987 rates we find that total crime fell by 55.1%, violent crime dropped 52.7%, and forcible rape offenses were down by 44.9%. More interestingly, attempted forcible rape plummeted 84.4%. It would seem the rapists were taking more care to choose likely to be defenseless targets.

Now, crime in the United States has been dropping since the early 90's. So the question arises as to how much (if any) of Florida's drop in crime can be credited to concealed carry and how much was due to the general trend toward lower crime rates. Or as the question is usually put, how much was due to something else? But I have to ask, why the embedded assumption that it was "something else"?

In 1986, only 8 states had "shall issue" concealed carry laws, and 1 allowed unrestricted carry. By five years later, in 1991, the number of "shall issue" states had risen to 16. Five years later again, in 2001, 31 states had "shall issue" concealed carry laws. By 2006, 37 states had gone to "shall issue," and the number of unrestricted carry states rose to 2. Today in 2013 we have a total of 37 states with "shall issue" concealed carry, and 5 that now allow unrestricted carry.

So, there seems little basis on which to assume that our national drop in crime rates was due to "something else". Granted there are other factors involved in crime rates, and states vary. But that opens up a whole different subject. I know of nothing that tracks the overall trend as clearly and unambiguously as the spread of concealed carry.

As a closing note, the percentages above are my calculations from the data and any errors are mine alone. The sources are here:

http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/Content/getdoc/f089698a-26f4-4899-9695-7c2dbc41f674/1971_fwd_sex_offenses.aspx
http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/Content/getdoc/d75b9423-91ea-4704-86c8-5beb8c50fb61/1971_fwd_totalcrime.aspx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rtc.gif

K.



What President Obama really did:

"In January 2012, President Obama issued 23 Executive Orders directing federal agencies to improve knowledge of the causes of firearm violence, what might help prevent it, and how to minimize its burden on public health."

http://www.iom.edu/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2013/Firearm-Violence/FirearmViolence_RB.pdf

Now according your link of Sex Offenses in Florida it shows in 1987 the number of Rape by Force was 4,823, it peaked in 1997 at 7,142 then started a decline, in 2012 the number 4,960.

The total violent crime in Florida in 1987 was 123,030 and continued to climb peaking in 1993 at 161,789 it declined until 2001 when it went up again from 128,041 to 130,323. Again it went down until 2005 when it went from 125,825 to 129,501 and continued to raise in 2007 to 131,781 then went back down. Also to note that Florida is in the top 10 most violent states, Alaska is number 1, all the other States in the top 10 are "shall issue", so much for that bogus thinking.

Hardly proof that crime decreased by your claim that concealed weapons decreased crime. It is also noted that the FBI now reports violent crime for 2012 increased by 0.7 per cent the second year crime increased.

You know Kirata you use this so many times and each time it been proven wrong, you need to get new material this stuff is old and not funny anymore.

< Message edited by Nosathro -- 11/6/2013 11:51:40 PM >

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 1025
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 11/6/2013 11:34:40 PM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: butternutsquash

Cite me a doi, you useless fuck-brain, and not some fucking doctored-up statistics. I get tired of you punks. You have no fucking integrity. You don't have a fucking conscience.

The damn things won't even protect your silly ass: http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2008.143099

But you're not going to believe anything that doesn't fit your political view: http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/pdf/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301409

Hey, everybody, Hunter here thinks that he's substantiated his views, and he wants to prove it to us by citing some material from an NRA-linked website or something cited by a rightwing blogger. Everyone come laugh at this fuckhead.

The more I see these useless wastes of human life, the more I want to knock them down. GROW SOME INTEGRITY, YOU USELESS FUCK.


That is not what the vast majority of surveys show.
In fact an overwhelming number of them, many done by people who started out to show how dangerous guns were, show that ccw laws result in a drop in crime, relative to the national drop in crime.


Now it's a "vast majority"? 18 0 9 is strong, but it wouldn't convince anyone that a new drug was safe.



_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 1026
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 11/6/2013 11:42:19 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: butternutsquash

just having a gun in your possession increases your risk of being shot by a factor of up to 5.45.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2759797/

One study of 600+ people settles it for you, eh?

Studies that directly assessed the effect of actual defensive uses of guns (i.e., incidents in which a gun was ‘used’ by the crime victim in the sense of attacking or threatening an offender) have found consistently lower injury rates among gun-using crime victims compared with victims who used other self-protective strategies. ~Source

Forgive me for repeating myself, but yanno. Frankly, most of the links you've posted are useless. There's no way to tell what they actually studied or how. The best of the bunch, because you linked to the full paper, doesn't even support the claim you trot it out as "evidence" of.

They didn't even measure gun ownership! They used suicide rates as a proxy. So they don't even know whether the guns were owned legally! Moreover, what they found was an impact on homicide rates, which isn't the same thing as your risk of being killed if you own a gun.

Which brings us to the question of how would you like your crow served?

K.



(in reply to butternutsquash)
Profile   Post #: 1027
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 11/6/2013 11:42:54 PM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: butternutsquash

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

You know, I'm a fat old man pushing 60.

AND YET IN ALL OF THIS TIME THAT YOU HAVE WASTED ON EARTH, YOU STILL HAVEN'T LEARNED TO CHECK YOUR FUCKING SOURCES. YOU STILL CHERRY-PICK WHATEVER BULLSHIT HAPPENS TO CONFORM TO YOUR VIEWS.


Hmmm. While I'm genuinely going to chase down some of the papers that have been cited that support c/c, and bear in mind that given the prevalence of guns in the USA I can see how c/c could have a positive impact, I can't help thinking that there seems to be an assumption that any anti c/c report is biased and that none of the pro c/c reports show any bias at all.

That does seem rather unusual given the highly charged and political nature of the debate.


_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to butternutsquash)
Profile   Post #: 1028
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 11/6/2013 11:45:08 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

Now according your link of Sex Offenses in Florida it shows in 1987 the number of Rape by Force was 4,823, it peaked in 1997 at 7,142 then started a decline, in 2012 the number 4,960.

The total violent crime in Florida in 1987 was 123,030 and continued to climb peaking in 1993 at 161,789 it declined until 2001 when it went up again from 128,041 to 130,323. Again it went down until 2005 when it went from 125,825 to 129,501 and continued to raise in 2007 to 131,781 then went back down.

Hardly proof that crime decreased...

Tell me again that you know what the word "rate" means.

K.

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 1029
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 11/6/2013 11:45:29 PM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline
You know HunterCA I keep wondering why you use terms like

Postmodernism is a term that describes the postmodernist movement in the arts, its set of cultural tendencies and associated cultural movements. It is in general the era that follows Modernism. It frequently serves as an ambiguous overarching term for skeptical interpretations of culture, literature, art, philosophy, economics, architecture, fiction, and literary criticism. Which has nothing to do with politics.

The word "Capitalism" was coined around 1850. Marxism was started about 8 years later.

I get the feeling you just trying to impress us, not working very well is it.

(in reply to crazyml)
Profile   Post #: 1030
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 11/6/2013 11:53:26 PM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: butternutsquash

If you pull a gun on somebody, that person is likely to pull out his own gun and shoot your ass.

That's soooo true. I can't tell you how many times it's happened to me. I pull a gun on somebody, he makes a move for something, I shake my finger at him sternly, and I still end up getting shot. I just can't figure it out. What am I doing wrong?




This could, of course, mitigate against c/c... I had assumed that the point of c/c was that if someone showed you a gun, you cloud then reveal your weapon and show yours, now you seem to be suggesting that that would be fruitless?

_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 1031
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 11/6/2013 11:55:07 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml

I can see how c/c could have a positive impact...

One way of looking at the question is to interview prisoners, which has been done. I don't have the link handy, but as you might imagine they had an aversion to encountering armed victims. Here's a case in point:

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3676008

K.



< Message edited by Kirata -- 11/6/2013 11:56:05 PM >

(in reply to crazyml)
Profile   Post #: 1032
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 11/7/2013 12:29:55 AM   
butternutsquash


Posts: 59
Joined: 11/5/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: butternutsquash

just having a gun in your possession increases your risk of being shot by a factor of up to 5.45.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2759797/

One study of 600+ people settles it for you, eh?

I see a bit of a disconnect between what is actually going on in this discussion and what you perceive is going on in this discussion.

HEY! JUST SO YOU KNOW, YOU'RE LOSING! HAHAHAHAHAHA! YOU HAVEN'T EVEN CONTRIBUTED ANYTHING SUBSTANTIVE TO THE DISCUSSION ASIDE FROM A TRULY SHODDY AND CRAPPY NON-STARTER BASED ON PURE CORRELATION. YOU HAVE NOT EVEN CONTRIBUTED ANY ACTUAL CONTENT TO THE DISCUSSION OTHER THAN CHILDISH TAUNTS.

ABORTED FETUS IN YOUR EYE! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Guns are not going to save you anymore than stricter gun laws are going to save you. The entire topic is a wash. It's like society is now divided on whether people should be allowed to carry chainsaws with them wherever they go, and the advocates are saying "WE HAVE A RIGHT TO CARRY THESE FOR OUR PROTECTION!" and the detractors are trying to point out that some of the crazy people with the chainsaws have started using them to kill people. The chainsaw advocates then start saying that EVERYBODY should carry chainsaws to defend themselves from those same people.

...BUT THE CHAINSAW IS A FUCKING TOOL! YOU USE IT TO CUT WOOD, such as to burn in your fireplace, NOT TO DISMEMBER PEOPLE! ARE YOU PEOPLE FUCKING DENSE??? ARE YOU FUCKING INSANE??? You might as well start stabbing people with ballpoint pins, you morons!

Well, I might use a gun to go out and shoot a deer that's been eating my lettuce, and then I might carve that deer up to feed me for a while. I might use the gun for duck-hunting. I might use it for playing a sport like shooting skeet. I might even just go somewhere and shoot the damn thing for fun. However, I would NEVER treat the damn thing as critical to my "self-defense." Violence just begets more violence.

The way I see it, if you do away with the violence in the first place, then problem solved. There are things that we can do to that end, such as mitigating inequality, eliminating racism, actually trying to talk things out, learning to communicate better, and so on. I really see those kinds of things as a better investment of our resources.

< Message edited by butternutsquash -- 11/7/2013 12:32:02 AM >

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 1033
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 11/7/2013 12:30:15 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml

I had assumed that the point of c/c was that if someone showed you a gun, you cloud then reveal your weapon and show yours, now you seem to be suggesting that that would be fruitless?

And then what? Compare how big they are? Heh. If someone has a gun pointed at me, what I will do is going to depend very much on the circumstances. How I size him up. What options I have, if any. Trust me, I've been there. If none, then I'm going to be totally non-threatening and cooperative until either he gives me an opening or I can create one. Which may not happen, if he's very careful. But I still have the advantage that he doesn't know I'm armed. And if he isn't smart enough to make finding out his first order of business, things could go badly for him very quickly.

K.




< Message edited by Kirata -- 11/7/2013 12:38:52 AM >

(in reply to crazyml)
Profile   Post #: 1034
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 11/7/2013 12:38:14 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml

I had assumed that the point of c/c was that if someone showed you a gun, you cloud then reveal your weapon and show yours, now you seem to be suggesting that that would be fruitless?

And then what? Compare how big they are? Heh. If someone has a gun pointed at me, what I will do is going to depend very much on the circumstances. How I size him up. Distance. Cover. What options I have, if any. Trust me, I've been there. If none, then I'm going to be totally non-threatening and cooperative until either he gives me an opening or I can create one. Which may not happen, if he's very careful. But I still have the advantage that he doesn't know I'm armed. And if he isn't smart enough to make finding out his first order of business, he's probably more at risk than I am. Because if he hasn't already shot me, he probably doesn't want to. But I will definitely shoot him.

K.




There's another "angle" to that in that; if the gun laws are lax, the statistics say that more people are going to have weapons. This has to give any idiot law breaker a little bit of pause.

I admit that concealed carry has very little deterrent qualities against shooters like the kids at Columbine or the movie theater, etc. but, if Joe Methhead is thinking about climbing into a window at night, he has to give a little bit of thought to: "I wonder if this person might have a gun. I wonder if they have it, concealed. I wonder if it is close to their night stand". Those kinds of things.

In an unarmed society, all he has to do is grab a piece of wood or rebar on his way to the evening "festivities" and he has a really good chance of being better armed than the sheep upon which he preys.





_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 1035
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 11/7/2013 1:02:08 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: butternutsquash

The way I see it, if you do away with the violence in the first place, then problem solved.

Well we're shooting them as fast as we can.

quote:

ORIGINAL: butternutsquash

There are things that we can do to that end, such as mitigating inequality, eliminating racism, actually trying to talk things out, learning to communicate better, and so on. I really see those kinds of things as a better investment of our resources.

What do you mean "our" resources? I paid for my gun myself. When you reimburse me and start buying my ammunition, then we can have a chat about "our" resources. As for the rest, sounds good but that's another thread.

K.



(in reply to butternutsquash)
Profile   Post #: 1036
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 11/7/2013 1:09:10 AM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

read this
www.saf.org/LawReviews/KleckAndGertz1.htm



Like Lott study it Kleck and Gertz was discredit. But bogus reports don't matter.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 1037
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 11/7/2013 1:30:02 AM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml

I had assumed that the point of c/c was that if someone showed you a gun, you cloud then reveal your weapon and show yours, now you seem to be suggesting that that would be fruitless?

And then what? Compare how big they are? Heh. If someone has a gun pointed at me, what I will do is going to depend very much on the circumstances. How I size him up. What options I have, if any. Trust me, I've been there. If none, then I'm going to be totally non-threatening and cooperative until either he gives me an opening or I can create one. Which may not happen, if he's very careful. But I still have the advantage that he doesn't know I'm armed. And if he isn't smart enough to make finding out his first order of business, things could go badly for him very quickly.

K.




These guys didn't know the other was armed, but both were just exercising their 2nd Amendment rights, their god given gun rights, their right to defend themselves.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2013/09/two-michigan-drivers-shoot-and-kill-each-other-after-road-rage-incident/

Oh another thing about Florida, it announced in August of 2013 of issuing 1,149,836 conceal weapons permits, yet their violent crime rate is still above the national average and violent crime is up as well. And you claim that crime went down with "shall issue" concealed weapons permits, not that IS FUNNY

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 1038
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 11/7/2013 1:50:19 AM   
butternutsquash


Posts: 59
Joined: 11/5/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: butternutsquash

The way I see it, if you do away with the violence in the first place, then problem solved.

Well we're shooting them as fast as we can.

quote:

ORIGINAL: butternutsquash

There are things that we can do to that end, such as mitigating inequality, eliminating racism, actually trying to talk things out, learning to communicate better, and so on. I really see those kinds of things as a better investment of our resources.

What do you mean "our" resources? I paid for my gun myself. When you reimburse me and start buying my ammunition, then we can have a chat about "our" resources. As for the rest, sounds good but that's another thread.

K.





I have to pay for the regulatory system that needs to be there for you to own the gun. We could just ban guns altogether, and it would save me a couple of bucks. Good idea.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 1039
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 11/7/2013 2:20:46 AM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml

I had assumed that the point of c/c was that if someone showed you a gun, you cloud then reveal your weapon and show yours, now you seem to be suggesting that that would be fruitless?

And then what? Compare how big they are? Heh.


As you, sensibly pointed out - if you were the person with the gun out, you'd pop a cap in his ass before he had a chance to draw his c/c.

You're smarter than the vast majority K, so I'm quite sure that you'd be smart enough to know whether he was going for a gun or his federal ID, but I struggle to believe that everyone is as smart or temperate as you.

quote:



If someone has a gun pointed at me, what I will do is going to depend very much on the circumstances. How I size him up. What options I have, if any. Trust me, I've been there. If none, then I'm going to be totally non-threatening and cooperative until either he gives me an opening or I can create one. Which may not happen, if he's very careful. But I still have the advantage that he doesn't know I'm armed. And if he isn't smart enough to make finding out his first order of business, things could go badly for him very quickly.

K.





They could go badly for him very quickly, or they could go badly for you very quickly.

You're not alone in having had the experience, and I'm personally convinced that the "non threatening and cooperative" approach is, on balance, the most likely to get you out a live.

For the benefit of others, I said "on balance" and "most likely".

_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 1040
Page:   <<   < prev  50 51 [52] 53 54   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** Page: <<   < prev  50 51 [52] 53 54   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125