RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness

RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

TigressLily -> RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (9/29/2013 4:49:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: KYsissy Is that sorta like Shoppes being better than Shops? As well as Colour being better than Color. Don't forget to pronounce Schedule with an "sh" while you're at it. I always find it amusing how my British/Canadian/Australian pals say Arse instead of ss, and Shite instead of . . . well, you can figure it out for yourselves. _____________________________ * * Not A Fetish/Kink Delivery System * * *

SerWhiteTiger -> RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (9/30/2013 3:17:04 AM)
OP, the only thing you could possibly accomplish with your post is to help educate crappy people about the red flags they're sprinkling in their profiles. Any worthwhile Dom who's saying such a thing is doing so for a good reason that you don't get.

ResidentSadist -> RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (9/30/2013 6:32:25 AM)
Just an FYI - That light pink font color is barely readable.

JeffBC -> RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (9/30/2013 7:40:40 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AllysBaby I will say first off that my opinion will probably tick alot of you off, I'm not here to make friends though simply to find my one, no one elses opinion matters to me. OK, I have to admit that I do not understand the purpose of posting on a discussion board if your intent is not to discuss things. You need to find yourself a pontificating board -- otherwise known as your personal blog. quote: I have to laugh at all people who say No release permanent service required. Newsflash here folks permanent service is never required lets be honest its just what a person wants. If my future sub or slave and I end up together for all time then thats wonderful but never something I'd require. If I was a sub and decided to leave permanent service, whether I initially agreed on permanent service or not I would leave and if the Dominant had an issue he or she would be more than welcome to have an issue with a restraining order and police involvement that I would bestow on them also. I'm going to start right out by saying that my dynamic is ... well ... dynamic. I have no expectation of permanent anything. But still, I have met other couples for whom "cannot leave" is a real thing and substantially better thought out than you seem to imply. In other words, I have more experience in the BDSM world than you do. The humorous thing about that is that I have almost zero experience in the BDSM world. quote: No one is ever obligated for permanent service of any kind whether its agreed too or not. Thats a fact. No matter what role you're in remember you can always walk away. I am a Domme and I am saying tear up contracts in any case if you are not happy. In other words, you find no binding obligation in your own promises or the promises of others. How does this square with your conception of "honor"? It's also worth pointing out that as is normal, BDSM people tend to inflate concepts. The proper phrase to describe such relationships is "will not" rather than "can not". But I, myself, am disinclined to nitpick semantics when I get the point of the phrase just fine.

Miyani -> RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (9/30/2013 8:05:07 AM)
Are we at the point where we start picking apart the profile yet? Let me know when we get there (though there's a ton of usable material in the OP), because good lord.

VideoAdminChi -> RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (9/30/2013 9:22:24 AM)
You may reference other posters' profile to give them constructive criticism, but please do not reference them in order to bring negative attention to them.

AllysBaby -> RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (9/30/2013 9:32:31 AM)
That's assuming I'm being honest in my profile about what I want so make fun of it all you want. I have someone wanting to be my sub that's under consideration by Me already

AllysBaby -> RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (9/30/2013 9:33:41 AM)
Oh chi chi I don't care let them it amuses me I can handle myself without big brother thanks

AllysBaby -> RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (9/30/2013 9:37:25 AM)
It's already happened so your a little slow chi chi

Miyani -> RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (9/30/2013 9:42:58 AM)
I was mostly funnin', but thank you for the clarification. :)

ResidentSadist -> RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (9/30/2013 9:43:16 AM)
Thanks for dropping the pink font, much easier to read now. [:D]

thishereboi -> RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (9/30/2013 9:50:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist Thanks for dropping the pink font, much easier to read now. [:D] Yea, now if we can get past that condescending tone every time she says "chi chi"

AllysBaby -> RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (9/30/2013 10:44:02 AM)
I was on a friends cell since I don't own one so no thanks needed and thank you for noticing boi

OsideGirl -> RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (9/30/2013 10:49:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AllysBaby Oh chi chi I don't care let them it amuses me I can handle myself without big brother thanks Management doesn't need your permission to enforce the rules.

ChatteParfaitt -> RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (9/30/2013 11:36:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AllysBaby That's assuming I'm being honest in my profile about what I want so make fun of it all you want. I have someone wanting to be my sub that's under consideration by Me already Why wouldn't a person be honest about what they want in their profile? Being dishonest is not something to be proud of. BTW: Having someone under consideration means absolutely nothing. It's another online buzz term for the clueless.

VideoAdminGamma -> RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (9/30/2013 12:03:57 PM)
Fast Reply Please stay on topic or thread drift and do not make each other the topic of your posts. Thank you for being a part of CollarMe, Gamma

ivone57 -> RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (9/30/2013 4:37:43 PM)
well since i am married to my Master i guess it would be permanent service.... i think you are just a bit shaded..imho

ResidentSadist -> RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (9/30/2013 5:02:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist Thanks for dropping the pink font, much easier to read now. [:D] Yea, now if we can get past that condescending tone every time she says "chi chi" That shit's killin' me . . . in lower case nonetheless. I thought she was gonna' say "chi chi get the yayo" but now I keep hearing that old jingle from the Chia Pet Commercial "Chi Chi Chi Chia". God bless her pompous noob little heart. We love you Chi.

DesFIP -> RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (9/30/2013 5:31:16 PM)
I'm not sure why anyone who boasts about lying to other people is surprised when those other people give her short shrift. And lying may get you started in a relationship but it bodes badly for it lasting. As the op neither believes a relationship can last, nor wants it to, I believe she should be very happy when she gets her way and this burgeoning relationship fails.

littlewonder -> RE: Dominant/Submissive/Slave Permanent Service Foolishness (9/30/2013 7:06:48 PM)
poor guy you've got strung along. Hopefully he reads the boards and finds out you are not who you claim to be.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.1855469