RE: No worries about the shutdown (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


dcnovice -> RE: No worries about the shutdown (10/1/2013 3:44:20 AM)

quote:

the House holds the power of the purse

Not unilaterally.

The Constitution (I.7) says simply, "All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills." Bills passed by the House still require passage in the Senate and presidential approval.




KYsissy -> RE: No worries about the shutdown (10/1/2013 4:01:17 AM)

All of this could yave been avoided if Congress had passed a budget like they are supposed to every year, and have not done for the past several years. I think the pola like this drama.




Lucylastic -> RE: No worries about the shutdown (10/1/2013 4:09:35 AM)

On Meet The Press, Sen. Ted Cruz stated that his alternative to the ACA is that uninsured people should get a job,

http://www.politicususa.com/2013/09/29/ted-cruz-tells-people-health-insurance-job.html

but 60% of the uninsured already have jobs.
According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, Ted Cruz is completely wrong about who the uninsured are, “Over six in ten of the uninsured have at least one full-time worker in their family, and 16% have a part-time worker in the family. Individuals below poverty are at the highest risk of being uninsured, and this group accounts for 38% of all the uninsured (the poverty level for a family of four was $23,050 in 2012). In total, nine in ten of the uninsured are in low- or moderate-income families, meaning they are below 400% of poverty. The problem for employees whose employers offer health insurance is that they can’t afford it, “Workers usually enroll in employer-sponsored health insurance if they are eligible.4 However, it has become increasingly difficult for many workers to afford coverage. In 2013, the average annual total cost of employer-sponsored family coverage was $16,351, and the share of the premium paid by workers was 29%. Between 2003 and 2013, premiums have increased by 80%.5.”


As an aside...why did they pass the bill sunday that not only delays a key part of Obamacare, it allows bosses to deny women any health care, including birth control, on "moral or religious grounds."
What makes them think THAT would get passed by the senate????
Yeah its al the dems fault:)
[8|]




DarkSteven -> RE: No worries about the shutdown (10/1/2013 4:37:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

Exactly. I did not think they would go this route, but they represent citizens who want them to do this so they are.


Odd. When I read things, I got a sense of inevitability.

The citizens do not want a shutdown. Period. The only people who favor it, do not do so because it's a shutdown, but as a means to stop/slow Obamacare and/or government spending. It won't slow Obamacare, and the idea of stopping spending not when it occurs, bit when it's time to pay for what's already been bought, is insane.
quote:



They are the House of Representatives. They are not simply a right side of the left side, they do hold the purse strings and they are using that power legally.


Absolutely. There is no question that this is in their power. The question is, will it benefit them politically or not? Or, to use an outdated, archaic concept, what benefits the country as a whole?
quote:



I myself find this very interesting. Still, the Dems have shutdown the Government in the past and we seem to be OK so I suspect we are going to be better off for this action in the long run or at least come out of this stronger. Of course, the fat lady has not sung yet.


It is neither the Dems nor the GOP that can shut down the government. Rather, it is their refusal to work things out, although I will say that here, the GOP has deliberately provoked this by adding conditions which everyone knows the Dems will not accept.

There are two questions.

1. Will the "shutdown" (actually, a cutting back of services) even be noticed?
2. Who will take the blame/credit for it?

Right now, the Dems are the more reality-driven, pragmatic party and the GOP have been driven by a sense that if they're ideologically pure, reality will follow their wishes. (e.g., the 2012 election where the GOP was predicting a GOP landslide based on Rasmussen and Gallup while the Dems were using every other polling source that showed an Obama win, and the Iraq war, where Bush 43 threw out all the analysis prepared for his father which showed that occupation of Iraq would be a stupid course of action. Meanwhile, Pelosi correctly foresaw that the Bush initiatives would be disasters and, rather than fight them quixotically like Teddy and the Cruzers are doing here, positioned her party to be the party of We're-not-Bush.)

We've seen this movie before and we know how it ends. Gingrich, the architect of the major shutdown we've seen before, has tried to tell his fellow Republicans not to follow this path but they're convinced that their ideological purity will make things different from when Newt was responsible for discrediting a previously very virile GOP House.

Note: In the above, I've referred to the GOP as thought it's a monolith. It's not. The old guard GOP is terrified of what they're in for, and the Tea Party wing, led here by Cruz, is driving this. It bothers me a LOT that Cruz is smart enough to know that he is appealing to the TP wing, not the party as a whole, and his gambit here will serve to further fragment the GOP. He doesn't care. He puts his personal ambition over not only the country, but his party as well.




Yachtie -> RE: No worries about the shutdown (10/1/2013 5:39:05 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

The Obamacare exchanges will be open right on time. [8|]



Yes, and the young people will be standing in line to sign up. I'll be there handing out doughnuts. I should have enough for all. I bought a dozen.



Enjoy them. [:D]




Lucylastic -> RE: No worries about the shutdown (10/1/2013 6:02:53 AM)

LOL Daily News Front cover...


Love it
[image]http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1382318/original.jpg[/image]
Had a ditz moment




Lucylastic -> RE: No worries about the shutdown (10/1/2013 6:10:51 AM)

government shutdown
whats affected and what isnt
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2013/09/politics/government-shutdown-impact/index.html?iid=article_sidebar




DsBound -> RE: No worries about the shutdown (10/1/2013 6:28:04 AM)

[image][IMG]http://i1270.photobucket.com/albums/jj603/patriotboerboels/IMG_20131001_062059_zps73e37ef7.jpg[/IMG][/image]]




DsBound -> RE: No worries about the shutdown (10/1/2013 6:31:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

LOL Daily News Front cover...


Love it



Fitting... he is for sure.




mnottertail -> RE: No worries about the shutdown (10/1/2013 6:42:07 AM)

And we got more comin'.

[image]local://upfiles/61037/D92CA2D41E584237BA137B5C245DAC37.jpg[/image]




cloudboy -> RE: No worries about the shutdown (10/1/2013 7:54:10 AM)

That's it right there.

The US leader who started the borrowing binge of the USA was Reagan.

In 1980 budget problems were related to the expensive legacy of Vietnam, today the legacy is Iraq,, Afghanistan, and the fiscal crisis.




Phydeaux -> RE: No worries about the shutdown (10/1/2013 9:45:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

Exactly. I did not think they would go this route, but they represent citizens who want them to do this so they are.


Odd. When I read things, I got a sense of inevitability.

The citizens do not want a shutdown. Period. The only people who favor it, do not do so because it's a shutdown, but as a means to stop/slow Obamacare and/or government spending. It won't slow Obamacare, and the idea of stopping spending not when it occurs, bit when it's time to pay for what's already been bought, is insane.
quote:



They are the House of Representatives. They are not simply a right side of the left side, they do hold the purse strings and they are using that power legally.


Absolutely. There is no question that this is in their power. The question is, will it benefit them politically or not? Or, to use an outdated, archaic concept, what benefits the country as a whole?
quote:



I myself find this very interesting. Still, the Dems have shutdown the Government in the past and we seem to be OK so I suspect we are going to be better off for this action in the long run or at least come out of this stronger. Of course, the fat lady has not sung yet.


It is neither the Dems nor the GOP that can shut down the government. Rather, it is their refusal to work things out, although I will say that here, the GOP has deliberately provoked this by adding conditions which everyone knows the Dems will not accept.

There are two questions.

1. Will the "shutdown" (actually, a cutting back of services) even be noticed?
2. Who will take the blame/credit for it?

Right now, the Dems are the more reality-driven, pragmatic party and the GOP have been driven by a sense that if they're ideologically pure, reality will follow their wishes. (e.g., the 2012 election where the GOP was predicting a GOP landslide based on Rasmussen and Gallup while the Dems were using every other polling source that showed an Obama win, and the Iraq war, where Bush 43 threw out all the analysis prepared for his father which showed that occupation of Iraq would be a stupid course of action. Meanwhile, Pelosi correctly foresaw that the Bush initiatives would be disasters and, rather than fight them quixotically like Teddy and the Cruzers are doing here, positioned her party to be the party of We're-not-Bush.)

We've seen this movie before and we know how it ends. Gingrich, the architect of the major shutdown we've seen before, has tried to tell his fellow Republicans not to follow this path but they're convinced that their ideological purity will make things different from when Newt was responsible for discrediting a previously very virile GOP House.

Note: In the above, I've referred to the GOP as thought it's a monolith. It's not. The old guard GOP is terrified of what they're in for, and the Tea Party wing, led here by Cruz, is driving this. It bothers me a LOT that Cruz is smart enough to know that he is appealing to the TP wing, not the party as a whole, and his gambit here will serve to further fragment the GOP. He doesn't care. He puts his personal ambition over not only the country, but his party as well.



Interesting analysis. How you can logically blame the republicans for "including things the democrats won't accept" without having exactly the same analysis for the democrats is... amazing.





Phydeaux -> RE: No worries about the shutdown (10/1/2013 9:47:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

That's it right there.

The US leader who started the borrowing binge of the USA was Reagan.

In 1980 budget problems were related to the expensive legacy of Vietnam, today the legacy is Iraq,, Afghanistan, and the fiscal crisis.


The budget problems of 1980 just like the budget problem of today has nothing to do with iraq, afghanistan, or iran.

It has to do with entitltement spending being (now) over 50% of the budget, and climbing. Tack on interest and you're around 2/3 of the budget.




Phydeaux -> RE: No worries about the shutdown (10/1/2013 9:51:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: NoBimbosAllowed


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: NoBimbosAllowed

'the Dems have shutdown the Government in the past'

meaning the republicans and the neo cons themselves never have, themselves?



Actually, I'm not fully up on democrat epithets - so depending on what you think neocons means - yes its entirely possible that the neocons have never shut the govt down.


you'll need to review some of the earlier Clinton attempts at reform that echoed this whole fracas most eerily.


You misunderstand. I remember the fracas very well. I am contesting the attribution to the neocons. Neocons are not a euphemism for republicans. Moynihan was a democrat, for example. So I don't think you can significantly attribute the shutdown to neocons.




Phydeaux -> RE: No worries about the shutdown (10/1/2013 9:56:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
Servicepeople will not get paid on the 15th. They will get IOU's. I wonder how it will feel taking fire in Afghanistan for free?

This one isn't correct.

quote:

President Barack Obama signed a bill Monday that will protect military pay in the case of any government shutdown.

The bill passed the Senate unanimously earlier on Monday after passing the House on Sunday morning.

The Pay Our Military Act was signed just two hours before a midnight government shutdown. After a government funding bill was vollied between the House and the Senate Monday evening, the House decided not to pass a "clean" funding bill in time to stave off a shutdown.

The new bill will protect pay and allowances for members of the Armed Forces when the government shuts down at midnight.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/30/obama-military-pay-government-shutdown_n_4020224.html



Cool. I missed that some how.

Cool. now the repulicans just need to keep that same formulla
pass whatever bills are hurting people at the moment - and let the democrats veto them.




DomKen -> RE: No worries about the shutdown (10/1/2013 10:17:07 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

That's it right there.

The US leader who started the borrowing binge of the USA was Reagan.

In 1980 budget problems were related to the expensive legacy of Vietnam, today the legacy is Iraq,, Afghanistan, and the fiscal crisis.


The budget problems of 1980 just like the budget problem of today has nothing to do with iraq, afghanistan, or iran.

It has to do with entitltement spending being (now) over 50% of the budget, and climbing. Tack on interest and you're around 2/3 of the budget.


Nope. Most of the federal entitlements programs are self funded and presently in the black. The overwhelming part of the government that is funded in the budget is defense and it is the cause of the deficits and the vast bulk of the debt.




mnottertail -> RE: No worries about the shutdown (10/1/2013 10:17:40 AM)

I am lost regarding how D. Moynihan is involved in this. The fight was actually the republicans trying to kill Medicare/Medicaid much like Obamacare, although not as adamantly.

Moynihan was not on that side ideologically, or politically. That was all them whatever you want to call them, cuz not conservatives, nor republicans in the old sense of the world, and haven't been for aeons.




DomKen -> RE: No worries about the shutdown (10/1/2013 10:18:19 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
Servicepeople will not get paid on the 15th. They will get IOU's. I wonder how it will feel taking fire in Afghanistan for free?

This one isn't correct.

quote:

President Barack Obama signed a bill Monday that will protect military pay in the case of any government shutdown.

The bill passed the Senate unanimously earlier on Monday after passing the House on Sunday morning.

The Pay Our Military Act was signed just two hours before a midnight government shutdown. After a government funding bill was vollied between the House and the Senate Monday evening, the House decided not to pass a "clean" funding bill in time to stave off a shutdown.

The new bill will protect pay and allowances for members of the Armed Forces when the government shuts down at midnight.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/30/obama-military-pay-government-shutdown_n_4020224.html



Cool. I missed that some how.

Cool. now the repulicans just need to keep that same formulla
pass whatever bills are hurting people at the moment - and let the democrats veto them.


Yeah pretty soon it will all be funded and they can stop this perpetual whining about something so popular the American people have crushed the various websites offering sign ups.




DomKen -> RE: No worries about the shutdown (10/1/2013 10:19:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: NoBimbosAllowed


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: NoBimbosAllowed

'the Dems have shutdown the Government in the past'

meaning the republicans and the neo cons themselves never have, themselves?



Actually, I'm not fully up on democrat epithets - so depending on what you think neocons means - yes its entirely possible that the neocons have never shut the govt down.


you'll need to review some of the earlier Clinton attempts at reform that echoed this whole fracas most eerily.


You misunderstand. I remember the fracas very well. I am contesting the attribution to the neocons. Neocons are not a euphemism for republicans. Moynihan was a democrat, for example. So I don't think you can significantly attribute the shutdown to neocons.

How the fuck do you Moynihan was involved in these shutdowns? In detail.




Phydeaux -> RE: No worries about the shutdown (10/1/2013 10:24:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: NoBimbosAllowed


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: NoBimbosAllowed

'the Dems have shutdown the Government in the past'

meaning the republicans and the neo cons themselves never have, themselves?



Actually, I'm not fully up on democrat epithets - so depending on what you think neocons means - yes its entirely possible that the neocons have never shut the govt down.


you'll need to review some of the earlier Clinton attempts at reform that echoed this whole fracas most eerily.


You misunderstand. I remember the fracas very well. I am contesting the attribution to the neocons. Neocons are not a euphemism for republicans. Moynihan was a democrat, for example. So I don't think you can significantly attribute the shutdown to neocons.

How the fuck do you Moynihan was involved in these shutdowns? In detail.

Since you're not paying attention:

You said the neocons shut down the government in '95 and '96.

I said I don't think you can blame the neocons. Neocon is not a euphemism for republican. Moynihan was a neocon, for example.

So while there were perhaps a couple of dozen "neocons" in office - again I don't think you can accurately abscribe the shut down to an ideology; specifically to that ideology.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875