RE: The Covert Messiah (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


DomKen -> RE: The Covert Messiah (10/18/2013 9:30:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: NoBimbosAllowed

no more than a reductionist reply as yours above is scientific, Dom.

Oh, and if you were truly 'scientific', rather than someone who merely takes emotional satisfaction in imagining himself so, you'd know that performance pieces are the PLATFORM of the posterboy for athiest pro-science groups around the world.

And if you were truly scientific, Dom, rather than just an emotionalist wearing the trappings of science, you'd appreciate the sciences of anthropology and memetics related to anthropology, which deal with the concept of "posterboys".

name the current posterboy for atheists, following the science of anthropology and memetics, Dom.

instead of tossing out half-assed one liners like a Fire and Brimstone Southern baptist.

name the posterboy, Dom, beloved of Dawkins himself.

WTF?

There are many prominent atheists. I read Dawkins, PZ Myers and a couple of others on Freethoughtblogs. For comedy it's Tim Minchin. But I'd consider none of them to be "posterboys" which is not a term in anthropology. Memetics is the idea that ideas have a "life" of their own and are transmitted and evolve. It is not part of anthropology either and is really just an outgrowth of Dawkins' book "the Selfish Gene."

So when you decide to stop posting weird word salad you do let me know.




NoBimbosAllowed -> RE: The Covert Messiah (10/18/2013 10:01:13 PM)

oh STOP it. Minchin is the posterboy and you know it, and you mentioned him, so don't blather out of both sides of your mouth and use terms like "weird word salad". and being reductionist in your replies which again is EXACTLY the kind of behaviour which 'atheists' complain about religists using. If it was word salad you couldn't have replied so directly, like any other wannabe NPR HACK. By dint of your reply and its manner you basically shat on your own attempt at a snarkie.

Memetics completely embrace the idea of every "cu" Minchin uses as being for effect and for garnering a specific sociological response from not only his audience but also the voting public which his audience touches and interacts with.

And as long as hypocritical self-described "atheists" who have as much faith in Human Self Regard as creedists have in a concept of god reply the way you do and embrace the same means as the religists do, you have no platform at all.

The Self Regard which is flawed, at best, as stated DIRECTLY by Minchin himself.

Oh, and for Tweakabelle who wanted a reply lacking snark? Let's looks SCIENTIFICALLY at how many SNARKS per LINE Tim Minchin himself makes, as compared to posts here:

(lines DIRECTLY from one of Minchin's most popular songs):

Lyrics to Storm :
Inner North London, top floor flat
All white walls, white carpet, white cat,
Rice Paper partitions
Modern art and ambition
The host's a physician,
Lovely bloke, has his own practice
His girlfriend's an actress
An old mate from home
And they're always great fun.
So to dinner we've come.

The 5th guest is an unknown,
The hosts have just thrown
Us together for a favour
because this girl's just arrived from Australia
And has moved to North London
And she's the sister of someone
Or has some connection.

As we make introductions
I'm struck by her beauty
She's irrefutably fair
With dark eyes and dark hair
But as she sits
I admit I'm a little bit wary
because I notice the tip of the wing of a fairy
Tattooed on that popular area
Just above the derrière
And when she says “I'm Sagittarien”
I confess a pigeonhole starts to form
And is immediately filled with pigeon
When she says her name is Storm.

Chatter is initially bright and light hearted
But it's not long before Storm gets started:
“You can't know anything,
Knowledge is merely opinion”
She opines, over her Cabernet Sauvignon
Vis a vis
Some unhippily
Empirical comment by me

“Not a good start” I think
We're only on pre-dinner drinks
And across the room, my wife
Widens her eyes
Silently begs me, Be Nice
A matrimonial warning
Not worth ignoring
So I resist the urge to ask Storm
Whether knowledge is so loose-weave
Of a morning
When deciding whether to leave
Her apartment by the front door
Or a window on the second floor.

The food is delicious and Storm,
Whilst avoiding all meat
Happily sits and eats
While the good doctor, slightly pissedly
Holds court on some anachronistic aspect of medical history
When Storm suddenly she insists
“But the human body is a mystery!
Science just falls in a hole
When it tries to explain the the nature of the soul.”

My hostess throws me a glance
She, like my wife, knows there's a chance
That I'll be off on one of my rants
But my lips are sealed.
I just want to enjoy my meal
And although Storm is starting to get my goat
I have no intention of rocking the boat,
Although it's becoming a bit of a wrestle
Because - like her meteorological namesake -
Storm has no such concerns for our vessel:

“Pharmaceutical companies are the enemy
They promote drug dependency
At the cost of the natural remedies
That are all our bodies need
They are immoral and driven by greed.
Why take drugs
When herbs can solve it?
Why use chemicals
When homeopathic solvents
Can resolve it?
It's time we all return-to-live
With natural medical alternatives.”

And try as hard as I like,
A small crack appears
In my diplomacy-dike.
“By definition”, I begin
“Alternative Medicine”, I continue
“Has either not been proved to work,
Or been proved not to work.
You know what they call “alternative medicine”
That's been proved to work?
Medicine.”

“So you don't believe
In ANY Natural remedies?”

“On the contrary actually:
Before we came to tea,
I took a natural remedy
Derived from the bark of a willow tree
A painkiller that's virtually side-effect free
It's got a weird name,
Darling, what was it again?
Masprin?
Basprin?
Asprin!
Which I paid about a buck for
Down at my local drugstore.

The debate briefly abates
As our hosts collects plates
but as they return with desserts
Storm pertly asserts,

“Shakespeare said it first:
There are more things in heaven and earth
Than exist in your philosophy…
Science is just how we're trained to look at reality,
It can't explain love or spirituality.
How does science explain psychics?
Auras; the afterlife; the power of prayer?”

I'm becoming aware
That I'm staring,
I'm like a rabbit suddenly trapped
In the blinding headlights of vacuous crap.
Maybe it's the Hamlet she just misquothed
Or the eighth glass of wine I just quaffed
But my diplomacy dike groans
And the arsehole held back by its stones
Can be held back no more:

“Look , Storm, I don't mean to bore you
But there's no such thing as an aura!
Reading Auras is like reading minds
Or star-signs or tea-leaves or meridian lines
These people aren't plying a skill,
They are either lying or mentally ill.
Same goes for those who claim to hear God's demands
And Spiritual healers who think they have magic hands.

By the way,
Why is it OK
For people to pretend they can talk to the dead?
Is it not totally fucked in the head
Lying to some crying woman whose child has died
And telling her you're in touch with the other side?
That's just fundamentally sick
Do we need to clarify that there's no such thing as a psychic?

What, are we fucking 2?
Do we actually think that Horton Heard a Who?
Do we still think that Santa brings us gifts?
That Michael Jackson hasn't had facelifts?
Are we still so stunned by circus tricks
That we think that the dead would
Wanna talk to pricks
Like John Edwards?

Storm to her credit despite my derision
Keeps firing off clichés with startling precision
Like a sniper using bollocks for ammunition

“You're so sure of your position
But you're just closed-minded
I think you'll find
Your faith in Science and Tests
Is just as blind
As the faith of any fundamentalist”

“Hm that's a good point, let me think for a bit
Oh wait, my mistake, it's absolute bullshit.
Science adjusts it's beliefs based on what's observed
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved.
If you show me
That, say, homeopathy works,
Then I will change my mind
I'll spin on a fucking dime
I'll be embarrassed as hell,
But I will run through the streets yelling
It's a miracle! Take physics and bin it!
Water has memory!
And while it's memory of a long lost drop of onion juice is Infinite
It somehow forgets all the poo it's had in it!

You show me that it works and how it works
And when I've recovered from the shock
I will take a compass and carve Fancy That on the side of my cock.”

Everyones just staring at me now,
But I'm pretty pissed and I've dug this far down,
So I figure, in for penny, in for a pound:

“Life is full of mystery, yeah
But there are answers out there
And they won't be found
By people sitting around
Looking serious
And saying isn't life mysterious?
Let's sit here and hope
Let's call up the fucking Pope
Let's go watch Oprah
Interview Deepak Chopra

If you're going to watch tele, you should watch Scooby Doo.
That show was so cool
because every time there's a church with a ghoul
Or a ghost in a school
They looked beneath the mask and what was inside?
The fucking janitor or the dude who runs the waterslide.
Throughout history
Every mystery
Ever solved has turned out to be
Not Magic.

Does the idea that there might be truth
Frighten you?
Does the idea that one afternoon
On Wiki-fucking-pedia might enlighten you
Frighten you?
Does the notion that there may not be a supernatural
So blow your hippy noodle
That you would rather just stand in the fog
Of your inability to Google?

Isn't this enough?

Just this world?

Just this beautiful, complex
Wonderfully unfathomable, NATURAL world?
How does it so fail to hold our attention
That we have to diminish it with the invention
Of cheap, man-made Myths and Monsters?
If you're so into Shakespeare
Lend me your ear:
“To gild refined gold, to paint the lily,
To throw perfume on the violet… is just fucking silly”
Or something like that.
Or what about Satchmo?!
I see trees of Green,
Red roses too,
And fine, if you wish to
Glorify Krishna and Vishnu
In a post-colonial, condescending
Bottled-up and labeled kind of way
Then whatever, that's ok.
But here's what gives me a hard-on:
I am a tiny, insignificant, ignorant lump of carbon.
I have one life, and it is short
And unimportant…
But thanks to recent scientific advances
I get to live twice as long
As my great great great great uncleses and auntses.
Twice as long to live this life of mine
Twice as long to love this wife of mine
Twice as many years of friends and wine
Of sharing curries and getting shitty
With good-looking hippies
With fairies on their spines
And butterflies on their titties.

And if perchance I have offended
Think but this and all is mended:
We'd as well be 10 minutes back in time,
For all the chance you'll change your mind.


mainly snark and passive aggressive snide crap,

mainly an emotional commentary,
much like your own.

You, Dom, advocating for Atheism and its presumably beneficial effect on the world, is like De Niro's Jake La Motta being the posterboy for marriage counsellibg to avoid domestic violence.

and hey, buddy, it's just word salad there, so you neither get to reply with a half-assed one liner or be offended, right?






DomKen -> RE: The Covert Messiah (10/18/2013 11:10:46 PM)

Tim Minchin might be a big deal in Oz but most people, even most atheists have never heard of him.

These nonsensical attacks on me make no sense. I cannot even figure out what the fuck you're complaining about.

How about trying declarative statements and quote what I wrote that has your knickers all twisted.




NoBimbosAllowed -> RE: The Covert Messiah (10/18/2013 11:22:32 PM)

Oh dude, the evasion and the hypocrisy makes you MOST Catholic. You get bitchy then whine when someone else gets bitchy?

You aren't creative enough to be a Franciscan, not dedicated enough to be a Benedictine Monk, not able to debate well enough to be a Jesuit, but hey, throwing rocks against walls has always een the favourite song of the Dominicans.

You're a Dominican at heart, Dom.

how about YOY stop replying like a Dominican Catholic Priest on the back-foot instead?

and apparently you lied your ass off RE word salad since you whined almost IMMEDIATELY.

You mentioned being a sailor. Seems you were similar to the catholic chaplain for the ship.

and who said my knickers were twisted versus merely demanding you give up mocking the people you BEHAVE like?

nice try, Dom. but no.

and by the way?

Tim Minchin is a HUGE DEAL in the stomping grounds of Dawkins himself.

and guess what?

he's playing JESUS in Jesus Christ Superstar.

CCut the crap Dom, and admit you are merely addicted to emotional response, so you can actually "live" what you "post".

because right now, you're like a a gay guy on the down-lo. with a beard wife. Bitching about gay ,marriage, in public.

and since I am not making any sense at all, you can't whine like a bitch to the mods about that, since it makes no sense, right?




vincentML -> RE: The Covert Messiah (10/19/2013 6:39:23 AM)

quote:

Then they merely accepted on FAITH that the universe was expanding yet slowing down, til they were PROVEN WRONG?

NBA . . . A misrepresentation of faith in scientific knowledge. It is not the same as faith in religious dogma. Science works by constructing a model which the consensus accepts until its predictions are falsified. The purpose of research and investigation is to seek out what is wrong in the current model and advance our knowledge or change our understanding. Emergent knowledge through falsifying previous belief is the essence of science. The limitations of current knowledge are implicit in the scientific project.

See my reply to you in post #133 on page #7.




vincentML -> RE: The Covert Messiah (10/19/2013 6:47:14 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

Kirata
[..] individual consciousness, although normally coincident with the physical body, can nevertheless function independently and separate from it.



Those of us who have enjoyed an out-of-body experience (OBE, often called 'soaring') can attest to the validity of this claim. For kinksters, an OBE is often achieved as part of BDSM practices. For some, it is a goal of BDSM participation. There are numerous other ways of achieving this state of consciousness.

For those who have experienced an OBE, the experience itself is sufficient verification. External/independent verification is another matter. I'm not sure how it might be done, especially to the satisfaction of a materialist skeptic.


Tweakabelle . . . no role for the euphoria inducing chemicals: endorphins, dopamine, serotonin??

cheers from your friendly materialistic skeptic [:D]




DomKen -> RE: The Covert Messiah (10/19/2013 7:28:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: NoBimbosAllowed
<deleted word salad>

You got all bent out of shape because you insisted that the Kraken myth was based on encounters between sailors and living giant squid and I pointed out that that was impossible.

Somehow you've tried to turn this into something about Oz and atheists and that I'm some sort of catholic monk.

If you have a point make it in short declarative statements and I'll respond.




Kirata -> RE: The Covert Messiah (10/19/2013 8:15:25 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Science works by constructing a model which the consensus accepts until its predictions are falsified... The limitations of current knowledge are implicit in the scientific project.

Before we arrived at our current state of knowledge, you believed in the previous one with all the fervor of a zealous monk, dismissing with derision anything that contradicted it. Now you believe in the current state of knowledge with all the fervor of a zealous monk, dismissing with derision anything that contradicts it. And tomorrow you'll believe in the new paradigm with all the fervor of a zealous monk, dismissing with derision anything that contradicts it.

This is what you preach as sensible, sound, scientific thinking, that we should always place our faith in the shifting sands of the currently fashionable consensus, no matter how many times the previous ones have been wrong, and no matter how certain it is that the current one will prove to be flawed as well. For this, you assert, has nothing to do with faith, and is a practice that we should learn to respect lest we deserve the derision heaped upon ignorance.

And in other news, you new show premieres Sunday at 10am Eastern.

K.




Yachtie -> RE: The Covert Messiah (10/19/2013 8:19:25 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Science works by constructing a model which the consensus accepts until its predictions are falsified... The limitations of current knowledge are implicit in the scientific project.

Before we arrived at our current state of knowledge, you believed in the previous one with all the fervor of a zealous monk, dismissing with derision anything that contradicted it. Now you believe in the current state of knowledge with all the fervor of zealous monk, dismissing with derision anything that contradicts it. And tomorrow you'll believe in the new paradigm with all the fervor of a zealous monk, dismissing with derision anything that contradicts it.

This is what you preach as sensible, sound, scientific thinking, that we should always place our faith in the shifting sands of the currently fashionable consensus, no matter how many times the previous ones have been wrong, and no matter how certain it is that the current one will prove to be flawed as well. This, you assert, has nothing to do with faith, and is a practice that we should learn to respect lest we deserve the derision heaped upon us.

And, of course, you're only saying that purely for our benefit, motivated by the fullness of your goodwill, in order to save us from continuing to suffer the darkness of our ignorance.

K.




I expect the deniers in 3, 2, 1 ...




TigressLily -> RE: The Covert Messiah (10/19/2013 8:39:01 AM)


At the expense of sounding like Chicken Little, I would caution against deliberately attempting to induce Astral Projection during BDSM (or any other activity, such as during meditation). No doubt it occurs involuntarily, but OBEs are not the same thing as reaching other altered states.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

Kirata

[..] individual consciousness, although normally coincident with the physical body, can nevertheless function independently and separate from it.


Those of us who have enjoyed an out-of-body experience (OBE, often called 'soaring') can attest to the validity of this claim. For kinksters, an OBE is often achieved as part of BDSM practices. For some, it is a goal of BDSM participation. There are numerous other ways of achieving this state of consciousness.

For those who have experienced an OBE, the experience itself is sufficient verification. External/independent verification is another matter. I'm not sure how it might be done, especially to the satisfaction of a materialist skeptic.


Tweakabelle . . . no role for the euphoria inducing chemicals: endorphins, dopamine, serotonin??

cheers from your friendly materialistic skeptic [:D]

The difference, which I must stress along the lines of Vincent's questioning, is the silver cord which connects the self to its separated physical embodiment. Skepticism aside, this isn't to be played around with. That psychic energy cord (which can be seen while in an OBE state) can be broken. Experimentation in this area can produce a lethal result in the physical death of the corporeal self. Some things in life you just don't mess with. Whether one believes in the validity of OBEs is immaterial.

I'm a certified clinical hypnotherapist, and I don't mess around with Erotic Hypno. I chose not to practice professionally nearly 20 years ago for the same reasons (although I had shared office space set up and everything)--not to go messing around in people's heads.

There's a classic book on Astral Projection (which includes Astral Premonition) by a guy named Robert Morris? from WV - pardon my still having cartons of books packed away from a recent move, so I can't get my hands on it to doublecheck - but it's not until the very end that the reader discovers he was inducing his OBE states by huffing on toxic chemicals in his garage. Idiot. Credibility went right out the window, as far as I was concerned.




DomKen -> RE: The Covert Messiah (10/19/2013 9:22:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Science works by constructing a model which the consensus accepts until its predictions are falsified... The limitations of current knowledge are implicit in the scientific project.

Before we arrived at our current state of knowledge, you believed in the previous one with all the fervor of a zealous monk, dismissing with derision anything that contradicted it. Now you believe in the current state of knowledge with all the fervor of a zealous monk, dismissing with derision anything that contradicts it. And tomorrow you'll believe in the new paradigm with all the fervor of a zealous monk, dismissing with derision anything that contradicts it.

This is what you preach as sensible, sound, scientific thinking, that we should always place our faith in the shifting sands of the currently fashionable consensus, no matter how many times the previous ones have been wrong, and no matter how certain it is that the current one will prove to be flawed as well. For this, you assert, has nothing to do with faith, and is a practice that we should learn to respect lest we deserve the derision heaped upon ignorance.

And in other news, you new show premieres Sunday at 10am Eastern.

K.


NO!

We accept the present state of knowledge as the best model of reality we have right now just as we accepted the previous state as the best at that time. When someone comes along and says that model is wrong I ask for the evidence that supports that claim. People like you say I should accept their beliefs as fact without any evidence and then whine and accuse me of being close minded when I refuse. The actual fact that is that that is how science and reality works. Until you can present evidence, repeatable, verifiable evidence, it is entirely incorrect to accept your claims. It doesn't matter if that claim is that thoughts make water freeze into nicer crystals or that psi is real or that a Semitic war god created the universe 6000 years ago.




Kirata -> RE: The Covert Messiah (10/19/2013 11:10:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

People like you say I should accept their beliefs as fact without any evidence and then whine and accuse me of being close minded when I refuse.

I suspect your opinion of yourself is somewhat overwrought. I seriously doubt that anybody gives a flying fuck whether or not you accept their experience as factual. But the word "experience" in that sentence highlights a misrepresentation on your part. It's one thing merely to "believe" in Unicorns, without any evidence. It's another matter entirely to have the experience of finding one grazing in your back yard. Someone who has experienced being out of their body has a very good basis for claiming that it's possible. It is your contrary belief that rests solely on faith without evidence.

K.




DomKen -> RE: The Covert Messiah (10/19/2013 1:20:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

People like you say I should accept their beliefs as fact without any evidence and then whine and accuse me of being close minded when I refuse.

I suspect your opinion of yourself is somewhat overwrought. I seriously doubt that anybody gives a flying fuck whether or not you accept their experience as factual. But the word "experience" in that sentence highlights a misrepresentation on your part. It's one thing merely to "believe" in Unicorns, without any evidence. It's another matter entirely to have the experience of finding one grazing in your back yard. Someone who has experienced being out of their body has a very good basis for claiming that it's possible. It is your contrary belief that rests solely on faith without evidence.

K.


No where in the sentence you quote is the word experience. So stop making up dumbass strawmen to attack and deal with what was actually written.

As to the claim that because someone has had an experience they describe as an OBE, I will simply ask them if they can do it consistently and then ask them to do it under experimental conditions. All they have to do is report what word is written on a chalk board in another room. Since they can't and the experience described is reproducible by doing certain things to a person it is entirely reasonable to conclude it is a sensory hallucination as has been firmly established by much investigation of the subject.
http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/127/2/243.short
http://www.jneurosci.org/content/25/3/550.short




Kirata -> RE: The Covert Messiah (10/19/2013 2:53:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

As to the claim that because someone has had an experience they describe as an OBE, I will simply ask them if they can do it consistently and then ask them to do it under experimental conditions. All they have to do is report what word is written on a chalk board in another room. Since they can't and the experience described is reproducible by doing certain things to a person it is entirely reasonable to conclude it is a sensory hallucination as has been firmly established by much investigation of the subject.

http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/127/2/243.short
http://www.jneurosci.org/content/25/3/550.short

A single study in which the subjects were neurological patients seems a reach, and using brain stimulation to produce the sensation of an OOBE is rather obviously a study of brain stimulation, not OOBE.

Charles Tart, however, did almost exactly the study you propose and the subject was successful in recovering a five-digit number. But she was an excellent subject, and it still took multiple tries. Expecting people to produce an OOBE on demand is akin to prayer studies that require people to pray on demand. You can recite prayers on demand, but you can't pray on demand.

And that's only the start of the problems. In some early studies that produced disparate results, the difference in outcomes was found to match the attitudes of the experimenters. Better techniques have evolved since then. But even Tart's study doesn't verify an OOBE. The subject could have obtained the number by other means, e.g., remote viewing or telepathy, neither of which involve an OOBE.

That said, however, medical personnel have recorded numerous examples of vericidal perceptions by patients who reported an OOBE while they were neither conscious nor in a physical position that would have allowed them to see the reported object or activity even if they had been awake. These kinds of things aren't going to go away, and the people aren't crazy.

K.




Kirata -> RE: The Covert Messiah (10/19/2013 3:25:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

I seriously doubt that anybody gives a flying fuck whether or not you accept their experience as factual. But the word "experience" in that sentence highlights a misrepresentation on your part.

No where in the sentence you quote is the word experience. So stop making up dumbass strawmen to attack and deal with what was actually written.

Stop making up dumbass strawmen to attack and deal with what was actually written. [:D]

K.





DomKen -> RE: The Covert Messiah (10/19/2013 3:36:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

I seriously doubt that anybody gives a flying fuck whether or not you accept their experience as factual. But the word "experience" in that sentence highlights a misrepresentation on your part.

No where in the sentence you quote is the word experience. So stop making up dumbass strawmen to attack and deal with what was actually written.

Stop making up dumbass strawmen to attack and deal with what was actually written. [:D]

K.



You think that is funny? Why do you think trying stupid crap like that makes you funny?




DomKen -> RE: The Covert Messiah (10/19/2013 3:41:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

As to the claim that because someone has had an experience they describe as an OBE, I will simply ask them if they can do it consistently and then ask them to do it under experimental conditions. All they have to do is report what word is written on a chalk board in another room. Since they can't and the experience described is reproducible by doing certain things to a person it is entirely reasonable to conclude it is a sensory hallucination as has been firmly established by much investigation of the subject.

http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/127/2/243.short
http://www.jneurosci.org/content/25/3/550.short

A single study in which the subjects were neurological patients seems a reach, and using brain stimulation to produce the sensation of an OOBE is rather obviously a study of brain stimulation, not OOBE.

Charles Tart, however, did almost exactly the study you propose and the subject was successful in recovering a five-digit number. But she was an excellent subject, and it still took multiple tries. Expecting people to produce an OOBE on demand is akin to prayer studies that require people to pray on demand. You can recite prayers on demand, but you can't pray on demand.

And that's only the start of the problems. In some early studies that produced disparate results, the difference in outcomes was found to match the attitudes of the experimenters. Better techniques have evolved since then. But even Tart's study doesn't verify an OOBE. The subject could have obtained the number by other means, e.g., remote viewing or telepathy, neither of which involve an OOBE.

That said, however, medical personnel have recorded numerous examples of vericidal perceptions by patients who reported an OOBE while they were neither conscious nor in a physical position that would have allowed them to see the reported object or activity even if they had been awake. These kinds of things aren't going to go away, and the people aren't crazy.

K.


I cannot find this study published in any journal ever. Where is it?

As to the rest how many times does it have to be pointed out to you that anecdotes are not useful evidence. It could be the combination of poor sedation and the input of other senses or it could just be a dream. Until someone can actually do it on demand and reproduce it under rigorous experimental standards its just anecdotes.




LookieNoNookie -> RE: The Covert Messiah (10/19/2013 4:29:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel


quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie
quote:

ORIGINAL: deathtothepixies
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie
quote:

ORIGINAL: deathtothepixies
but he wasn't the son of god

Says who?

Me, prove he was

Prove he wasn't.


There's a unicorn in this jar, prove there isn't.


[image]local://upfiles/566126/97C352D78C8D4F2CAFB9428DC2A0F9D4.jpg[/image]


This is a trick question....the unicorn is invisible!




Kirata -> RE: The Covert Messiah (10/19/2013 4:30:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

I cannot find this study published in any journal ever. Where is it?

I don't offer it as an example of the best. I only mentioned it because it matched your proposal. It's the second of Tart's earliest explorations in the field.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/13593162/Six-Studies-of-OBE-Charles-Tart

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

As to the rest how many times does it have to be pointed out to you that anecdotes are not useful evidence. It could be the combination of poor sedation and the input of other senses or it could just be a dream. Until someone can actually do it on demand and reproduce it under rigorous experimental standards its just anecdotes.

Ah, the old "anecdote" ploy. If we were chatting and I mentioned meeting a pretty brunette in the market the other day, you wouldn't dismiss it as anecdotal nonsense. You'd take me at my word. You only pull this "anecdote" business when you hear something that conflicts with your faith. It's really just a substitute for crying "heresy," because the priestly bullshit you're promoting is Scientism.

K.




TigressLily -> RE: The Covert Messiah (10/19/2013 5:00:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie
quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel
quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie
quote:

ORIGINAL: deathtothepixies
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie
quote:

ORIGINAL: deathtothepixies

but he wasn't the son of god

Says who?

Me, prove he was

Prove he wasn't.

There's a unicorn in this jar, prove there isn't.
[image]local://upfiles/566126/97C352D78C8D4F2CAFB9428DC2A0F9D4.jpg[/image]

This is a trick question....the unicorn is invisible!

*Best Maxwell Smart impression* Oh, the old invisible unicorn in a glass jar trick . . . Almost fell for that diabolical scheme. [sm=doh.gif]

(P.S. Lookie, where'd your kitty & puppy avatar go? Abe's okay, but not nearly as cute.)




Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625