graceadieu
Posts: 1518
Joined: 3/20/2008 From: Maryland Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen quote:
ORIGINAL: truckinslave I think they are Bart Stupac: when pushed by the Party/Mosque they agree to whatever evil is required of them. Then you really know nothing of Muslims. They run the gamut just as members of every other faith do. Following any aspect of sharia is no more required of Muslims than following the mosaic code is of Jews or Christians. All that is required of Muslims is obeying the five pillars, declaring there is no god but Allah, praying five times a day, fasting during Ramadan, giving a set percentage of your income to the poor and making the pilgrimage to Mecca once during their lifetime if that is feasible. What you obsess over is the repugnant behavior of fundamentalist. Which faith the fundamentalists are is really immaterial. If Christian fundamentalists ever take over a nation you can expect the same sorts of atrocities you now attack Muslims for. Just look into the actions of Oliver Cromwell to see that even "civilized Christians" are capable of atrocities in the name of their faith. And I've known Muslims that don't pray 5 times a day and don't fast the whole time and who knows if they give to the poor. A Muslim friend of mine gave me liquor for Christmas last year (which is funny, because neither of us are Christian), which I feel like is probably not, uh, kosher. Halal. Whatever. It's true that, right now, generally speaking, Muslim fundamentalists tend to be more extreme and more likely to be violent than their Christian counterparts. But look back in the Middle Ages - it was the opposite. And look at America-born Muslims, who tend to be very, well, American. So I feel like it's probably not something inherent to Islam, but rather something with the modern culture and socioeconomic/geopolitical situation in the Middle East and Central Asia.
|