DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/entire-section-of-rand-pauls-book-copied-verbatim-from-case Rand Paul has built his political appeal around a claim of honesty and being firm in his convictions. How can a libertarian justify the use of others work without their explicit permission? If the claims are accurate, Paul should face the consequences of the plagiarism. That being said, it might be nice to see how it's written in the book. I'm not saying he's innocent, but there might be more than buzzfeed is showing. I don't have the book but the speeches are on the web and his speechwriters very clearly copied material directly from wiki and an AP story. It doesn't matter if he used the material word-for-word, unless there was no acknowledgement. Take the following two examples: quote:
I believe that to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed (Declaration of Independence). quote:
I believe that "to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed" (Declaration of Independence). I used the exact same words, but the use of the quotation marks indicates that portion wasn't mine, but that it came from the DoI. The first one simply shows where I got the idea, but not that I took the text itself. So, if you don't have the book (and I don't either), this could be spin more than an accurate accusation. If truly there is plagiarism, then the plagiarist should face whatever consequence is appropriate.
< Message edited by DesideriScuri -- 11/3/2013 3:49:08 AM >
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|