BamaD
Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: cloudboy quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD Actually he was not acquitted it was a directed verdict, that means the state had no case. He didn't murder Green it was self defense, since you don't seem to understand it there is a massive difference between the two. When a man forces his way into my home at 2 am the last thing I would be concerned with is his race. A racist couldn't make it in the Air Force. One can still be acquitted by a directed verdict; double jeopardy attaches. I misused the word murder and should have stated "killed" instead. Regarding the role of race, we're not talking about you, but the killer. He knew Green, exchanged words with him, used a racial epithet, and then shot him to death. Just to be a little "dramatic" about it, Clint Eastwood's macho characters never shot any unarmed people to death b/c he was always better able to handle himself than these scared, trigger-happy, homeowners. In fact in one of his last movies, Gran Torino, he actually befriends the boy who broke into his garage. (At first he had a shot gun pulled up on him.) A There is a massive difference between killing and murder and the use of the word murder betrays your bias. B Pinkerton's brother was there and says he had no choice. C It was an M1 Garand, not a shotgun. Your inability to tell the difference tells a lot about your firearms knowledge. D A directed verdict is different from an acquittal. An acquittal means the jury doesn't think there is enough evidence to convict. A directed verdict means there should never have been charges. F You want him to go to jail because he didn't talk nice to the man who has pushed into his home and demanded that his wife leave with him.
_____________________________
Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.
|