quote:

The final rule issued today implements the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, and ensures that health plans features like co-pays, deductibles and visit limits are generally not more restrictive for mental health/substance abuse disorders benefits than they are for medical/surgical benefits.

Today’s action also includes specific additional consumer protections, such as:

- Ensuring that parity applies to intermediate levels of care received in residential treatment or intensive outpatient settings;

- Clarifying the scope of the transparency required by health plans, including the disclosure rights of plan participants, to ensure compliance with the law;

- Clarifying that parity applies to all plan standards, including geographic limits, facility-type limits and network adequacy; and

- Eliminating the provision that allowed insurance companies to make an exception to parity requirements for certain benefits based on “clinically appropriate standards of care,” which clinical experts advised was not necessary and which is confusing and open to potential abuse.

“This final rule breaks down barriers that stand in the way of treatment and recovery services for millions of Americans,” said Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. “Building on these rules, the Affordable Care Act is expanding mental health and substance use disorder benefits and parity protections to 62 million Americans. This historic expansion will help make treatment more affordable and accessible.”

“Americans deserve access to coverage for mental health and substance use disorders that is on par with medical and surgical care,” said Treasury Secretary Jacob J. Lew. “These rules mark an important step in ending the disparities that exist in insurance plans, and will provide families nationwide with critical coverage and protections that fulfill their health needs.”

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaNewAgeViking
Since scientific reality overcame the Rs revisionism about such basic realities as medical conditions, etc. So don't worry: this rule means the Rs can FINALLY get the treatment they so desperately need!

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Science. It works, bitches.

quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny

Since when has substance abuse qualified as a "disorder" instead of a tragic personal failing?

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny
Since when has substance abuse qualified as a "disorder" instead of a tragic personal failing?

Is Type II diabetes in an obese person a "disorder" instead of a tragic personal failing? Would you refuse treatment for a diabetic who suffered from food abuse? Is overeating addiction any different from shopping addiction from workaholic addiction from porn addiction? What is addiction? And how do you know?

• A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  
• Personal Responsibility
  
• Help for the truly needy
  
• Limited Government
  
• Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
  

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
Is Type II diabetes in an obese person a "disorder" instead of a tragic personal failing? Would you refuse treatment for a diabetic who suffered from food abuse? Is overeating addiction any different from shopping addiction from workaholic addiction from porn addiction? What is addiction? And how do you know?