quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Alaska receives about 1.84 for each 1.00 paid in federal taxes.   Uh, you fuckin Sie A they affect us, not just Mass.

The government in Alaska does not create laws that effect other states. They create laws that effect the people in the state of Alaska. They pay federal taxes because the federal government in DC passed laws that said they have to along with the other states. One is local government the other is not. But if joe wants to think they are tyrants and he in mass has to listen to them who am I to burst his bubble. By all means dance on little man.

Well squirm like a worm little girl.  If they are porking the citizen for a buck eighty four for their government to be run without our say so, that is oppressive rule of those who they pork, taxation without representation and so forth and so on.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

They create laws that affect other states by porking up their typical nutsacker economy and politics with other peoples money, leaving less rice in the bowl for non nutsackers to enhance their own conditions.

Just pointing that out to the clueless on any given subject. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Yeah, you work overtime not understanding.  I ain't playing.  You know what a nutsacker is.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

And if you knew what the Ping of Death was why did you write something about malformed ICMP like it was different from the Ping of Death? And as always where is the name of the mythic data redundancy system superior to RAID that doesn't involve extra storage.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Secondly, I never said the NSA's large data array didn't involve extra storage. Every error correction method involves extra storage of some kind.

What I said was they have derived their own methodology for handling very large arrays of hard drives, more than RAID could handle. The technology was based off the MIT technology. As for a link for you - find it yourself.

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
If that's true, then Alaska is a Tyrannical government. Since its pretty far away from me here in Massachusetts. And its just as far away from the nation's capital, Washington, D.C.. Its a silly notion when you take your argument to its logical conclusion.

quote:

The size of government has no bearing on the 'just or corruption' of said government. Nor does the size of the government being smaller translates into 'better government'. There are plenty of examples of small governments around the world; and one major disaster has wiped them out. There are plenty of corrupted governments that are small. And plenty in which government is close to the individual citizen, and STILL is evil.
You publically hate the idea of big government until you experience great hardship or disaster. An there are plenty of examples of your fellow conservatives in plenty of problems they can not solve on their own. And who came to help them out? That big government they railed at for years!

• A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  
• Personal Responsibility
  
• Help for the truly needy
  
• Limited Government
  
• Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
  

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Secondly, I never said the NSA's large data array didn't involve extra storage. Every error correction method involves extra storage of some kind.

What I said was they have derived their own methodology for handling very large arrays of hard drives, more than RAID could handle. The technology was based off the MIT technology. As for a link for you - find it yourself.

lie.

You claimed large data centers use a non RAID technique. We had quite a bit of fun making fun of you for that lie. So once again what is this non RAID date integrity scheme that big data centers use?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Secondly, I never said the NSA's large data array didn't involve extra storage. Every error correction method involves extra storage of some kind.

What I said was they have derived their own methodology for handling very large arrays of hard drives, more than RAID could handle. The technology was based off the MIT technology. As for a link for you - find it yourself.

lie.

You claimed large data centers use a non RAID technique. We had quite a bit of fun making fun of you for that lie. So once again what is this non RAID date integrity scheme that big data centers use?

Quote me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Well, if you and Ken want to look into it, you will find that they have a different mechanism for error correction for large drive arrays.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
And again, I can tell you regardless of what FactlessKen thinks that Raid is not the methodology used for very large arrays. Doesn't meet the requirements for scaleable and time response, as well as the addressing requirements.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech

I doubt it was a cyber attack but simply people actually trying to use a broken website.

As of this morning, the site is still broken in a lot of respects. To fill out an application online it would force me to lie in order to complete the application.

Sigh, back to a mail in paper form with attached letter of explanation.