Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Junk science


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Junk science Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Junk science - 12/9/2013 10:18:39 AM   
papassion


Posts: 487
Joined: 3/28/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: leonine


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel


quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave
Liberalism is a theology, and has maintained for my adult lifetime that the sexes are, in effect, identical.


The actual common liberal opinion is not that the sexes are identical (it would take an idiot not to notice numerous differences like girls have boobies) the common liberal opinion (and moderate opinion) is actually that the sexes should be treated equally. The complete ineptitude of some at comprehending that difference between these two positions makes me wonder if asshat is a theology.


It's not a mistake, it's an elementary trick of dishonest argument known as the straw man. You misrepresent your opponent's position as being something patently absurd, so that you can knock it down without effort: but all you have knocked down is the straw man you set up yourself. However, if you do it with enough conviction, your allies will be convinced that you have achieved something noteworthy. And since your opponents are not going to make fools of themselves defending the absurd proposition you have attributed to them, you can take their silence as proof that you have floored them with your devastating rhetoric.

Childish, but it makes them feel better.


Of course, the absolutel master of this has been O'bama himself. Time and time and time again.

"Some have said we must make the false choice between our ideals and our security". Who? Who said that. No one says that - certainly no one in mainstream politics.

W, Cheney and every one who supported torture made that argument. Obama rejected it as did every true patriot.


Obama thinks it OK to use drones to kill without trial (even kill some kids as collateral damage) but for God's sake, don't pour any any water on them! Interesting concept.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Junk science - 12/9/2013 11:38:41 AM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
Errm.. I'm pretty sure that Cheney was cool with drones. I appreciate that this totally fucks up the point you were trying to make, but I thought you'd want to know.

_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Junk science - 12/9/2013 1:16:03 PM   
HunterCA


Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: leonine


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel


quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave
Liberalism is a theology, and has maintained for my adult lifetime that the sexes are, in effect, identical.


The actual common liberal opinion is not that the sexes are identical (it would take an idiot not to notice numerous differences like girls have boobies) the common liberal opinion (and moderate opinion) is actually that the sexes should be treated equally. The complete ineptitude of some at comprehending that difference between these two positions makes me wonder if asshat is a theology.


It's not a mistake, it's an elementary trick of dishonest argument known as the straw man. You misrepresent your opponent's position as being something patently absurd, so that you can knock it down without effort: but all you have knocked down is the straw man you set up yourself. However, if you do it with enough conviction, your allies will be convinced that you have achieved something noteworthy. And since your opponents are not going to make fools of themselves defending the absurd proposition you have attributed to them, you can take their silence as proof that you have floored them with your devastating rhetoric.

Childish, but it makes them feel better.


Of course, the absolutel master of this has been O'bama himself. Time and time and time again.

"Some have said we must make the false choice between our ideals and our security". Who? Who said that. No one says that - certainly no one in mainstream politics.

W, Cheney and every one who supported torture made that argument. Obama rejected it as did every true patriot.



Having sat around with a whole lot of combat veterans, I wonder how you define a true patriot. I had Thanksgiving dinner with a former Marine who was in the battle to retake Hue City during the Tet offensive and a former Marine who ran the Mogodishue mile in Samalia. I know for a fact they wouldn't agree with you or consider you a true patriot. You throw shit around like that and it makes you look stupid.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Junk science - 12/9/2013 8:05:24 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion
Obama thinks it OK to use drones to kill without trial (even kill some kids as collateral damage) but for God's sake, don't pour any any water on them! Interesting concept.


How pray tell would a war work if enemy combatents had to be given trials before they could be shot, bombed, shelled or droned. And if you're cool with the first three being used to kill the enemy sans trial during a war how is using the last one any different?

(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 44
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Junk science Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063