feastie -> RE: Dixie Chicks: Radical Chicks? (7/4/2006 11:25:30 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: darkinshadows quote:
ORIGINAL: feastie I tossed my DC cd's. I believe everyone is entitled to their opinion but I think that people of celebrity often take their celebrity too far and abuse it. Natalie Maines did just that and lost any respect I personally had for her. I don't think music stars, movie stars, tv stars have any better opinions on the world and politics than the rest of us do. I believe it is wrong for them to use their celebrity as a platform to push their personal beliefs and agendas on the rest of us. I'm not gullible enough to fall for it, but there are many people that are, just because they've seen such and such in a movie or on tv. I don't think celebrities should be allowed to make their voices louder than mine, as I have just as many beliefs, ideas and opinions about politics and the world at large as they do. I just don't have the availability of a stage and a microphone. I avoid the movies, music, etc., of celebrities who have political agendas they present in public. I don't really care what Natalie Maines thinks of George Bush. What I do care about is that she maligned the President (it could have been Kerry, or Ronald McDonald, it wouldn't have mattered), on foreign soil in a very public way. This is the type of thing that makes our country weaker, not stronger. It makes us appear weak to the very people who wish to do us harm. Thanks for opening that door a little wider, Natalie, ya idiot. So celebreties do not have any freedom of speech? Lets just stop them supporting charities and lending their support to aid agencies then. That will put an end to it all. I did not say that they do not have freedom of speech. What I said was that their freedom of speech should not be louder than mine or anyone else's. It should be equal to every man. Further, I don't support their charities and aid agencies. Not to mention, they can support those agencies and charities with their checkbook and not their mouth, just like anyone else. I support local charities. Why should celebrity grant a person privileges beyond those of any other person? What makes their freedom of speech more valuable than any other person? It is more valuable, if Joe Blow can't get the same air time to make his pronouncements and he can't, can he?
|
|
|
|