RE: Anotther school shooting. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Moonhead -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/19/2013 11:08:43 AM)

I think some of the people with a bee in their bonnet about the social services seizing people's kids for no good reason fail to understand just how difficult it is for the C&YPS to make a case to take a child into care. I heard some real horror stories when I was working as a clerk in one of those dumps. Far from taking kids into care if the parent smacks it too hard in public, they'd have to jump through hoops and go into court if the parents were feeding the brat broken glass outside of the local Mickey D's and putting video of that on youtube.




RottenJohnny -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/19/2013 11:15:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

That's actually a pretty good point: can any of the Americans in here cite any examples of school nailbombings or homebrewed chemical attacks rather than shootings? I can't think of any myself, and I'd be interested to know if there were any such cases, rather than some bullied brat throwing a tantrum with daddy's gun.


Taken from Wikipedia...

The Columbine High School massacre was a school shooting which occurred on April 20, 1999, at Columbine High School in Columbine, an unincorporated area of Jefferson County in the State of Colorado. In addition to shootings, the complex and highly planned attack involved a fire bomb to divert firefighters, propane tanks converted to bombs placed in the cafeteria, 99 explosive devices, and bombs rigged in cars. Two senior students, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, murdered a total of 12 students and one teacher. They injured 24 additional students, with three other people being injured while attempting to escape the school. The pair then committed suicide.




Moonhead -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/19/2013 11:18:21 AM)

Thank you. I thought all of the students who died at Columbine were shot and the ieds weren't a great success, though?




Wendel27 -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/19/2013 11:18:59 AM)

 Very much so Moonhead. Social Serices have an uphill struggle doing anything at all. The police have limited powers to seize children if they are deemed to be at significant risk but there are strict time constraints on that before judgement is rendered [72 hours] as to whether the children can justifiably be taken into another form of care or returned to their parents/guardians.  It is a very difficult situation not made any easier by hyperbolic media caricatures.




tj444 -> RE: Another school shooting. (12/19/2013 11:20:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
the US way of doing things ain't working.

the other day traffic was crazy.. a female I know came over and she said no one would let her into traffic & it was backed up, etc.. so she had to nose her way in (she was only going a few blocks).. and the guy in behind her was ticked off cuz she got ahead of him.. he was giving her the finger and for blocks showing her how pissed off he was.. She gets here and tells the story saying.. "well, at least he didn't pull out a gun and shoot me".. and that very well coulda happened (I am in TX).. the reason that happens has nothing to do with being on prescribed drugs or being bullied, etc (which are some of the excuses/reasons cited for suicidal mass killers).. the problem with guns is if you have one (or access to one), its easy to pull it out (at school, at work, at a mall, anywhere) and shoot people for the slightest reason & in the heat of anger.. I personally don't understand why that is acceptable or should be a way of life..




Moonhead -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/19/2013 11:22:49 AM)

The thing that seems particularly frustrating for the social workers I've talked to is that the same media elements who won't shut up about Baby P are the same ones who'd be throwing shitfits about the PC nanny state if the social services had more powers to seize kids. Hell, they throw fits about that now, even without any justification for doing so. When they haven't had some dead kid turn up that they can use to have a go at what's left of this country's social infrastructure, of course.




RottenJohnny -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/19/2013 11:27:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Thank you. I thought all of the students who died at Columbine were shot and the ieds weren't a great success, though?

That's true. I took your question as more about the intent rather than the result.




Moonhead -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/19/2013 11:39:58 AM)

Nah, I'm more interested in results.
I'm sure there's wet liberals who'd take the fact that the two fuckwits at Columbine had such little faith in their demolition skills that they tooled up instead of trusting to the bombs as quite telling, come to that.
[;)]




lovmuffin -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/19/2013 11:44:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Freedomdwarf1

Ummm... because they couldn't otherwise get their smutty little hands on the guns in the first place to make those killings??


You just don't get it. One other poster said in the US it would take decades to get to where the UK is on gun control. They should have said many decades or a century. Here we have a crap load more people than the UK and a crap load more land with wide open spaces in between the more populated areas. Unlike the UK we have a crap load of people out of our crap load of a population who own firearms along with the notion they're entitled to possess them, you know, the 2nd amendment and all that stuff. Gun control won't go over the same way here as it did in the UK.

quote:

ORIGINAL:

The US more than pretty much anywhere else on the planet.
However, they don't seem to be able to enforce what laws they have.


There are certainly some gun laws that could be enforced that aren't. A bunch of fuckwitt gun grabbers want to make new restrictive gun laws yet we don't even enforce all the ones we have.




PeonForHer -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/19/2013 11:49:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie
Then I'll go back to my original assessment that your postings here are just xenophobic glee that American kids are dying. You've proven that beyond any shadow of a doubt by repeatedly refusing to engage in grown up discourse about a solution, and you've contributed nothing but shadenfreude and snark.


That's just utterly cretinous crap, Ed. Grow up.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/19/2013 11:50:10 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wendel27

Very much so Moonhead. Social Serices have an uphill struggle doing anything at all. The police have limited powers to seize children if they are deemed to be at significant risk but there are strict time constraints on that before judgement is rendered [72 hours] as to whether the children can justifiably be taken into another form of care or returned to their parents/guardians.  It is a very difficult situation not made any easier by hyperbolic media caricatures.

I agree that for many circumstances the Social Services are hard-pressed to make anything happen.
But in other cases it seems so easy and quick-as-lightning.

2 years ago when my step-son was causing all sorts of havoc at home (and oh boy was I glad we don't have guns over here coz we'd all be dead), we had a daily WW3 argument that often went on for hours and hours and frequently well into the early hours of silly o'clock.
One day I was arrested, without warning, and hauled into court for child abuse.
How? What? Where? Why? Who? When??? Fuck!!
Apparently, my step-son had made a formal complaint to Social Services only the day before because I had threatened to "punch him up the side of the head" because he was disturbing the house and the neighbours with his bad behavior and shouting.
It took a lot of explaining what actually happened and I got let off with a suspended "Bound Over" order.
Which reminds me - it lapses at the end of this month.

But it goes to show, sometimes Social Services can do things quickly when they put a mind to it.
And in case you're wondering, step-son is now 19, 6ft3" tall and I'm more than a foot shorter than he is.





Politesub53 -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/19/2013 11:50:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

The first thing the gov could do to help with this is to decriminalize the disciplining of children.


Just whats needed, a return to the days of child abuse being acceptable. It has been well proven that children who are beaten constantly follow suit as adults.




Discipline equals child abuse? Are you serious? Or are you utilizing a wholly different word(s) or idea as to, well, be yourself? [:D]

Anyone who thinks that a spanking equals a beating is a fool.


Anyone who thinks differently is fucking stupid. Thats why said laws were introduced.




Politesub53 -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/19/2013 11:53:41 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie

That's got to be the clumsiest lie I've seen in a while, and I just got through with grade appeals and have seen some whoppers.

You made the blanket equivalency between the whole range of possibilities covered by the word 'discipline, and 'a return to the days of child abuse'. There in no other interpretation that can be made by anyone who isn't barking at the moon insane, or else trivializing the victims of actual child abuse.
You don't own the dictionary, you don't get to pass off your irrational ideas as monolithic definitions that are binding on the world.

Discipline in raising a child consists of saying 'No', restricting access to non-essential items like TV, adding extra chores, limiting freedom to leave one's room, writing something that reflects on the undesirable behavior, and so on.
Abuse is abuse. Not knowing that there is a difference is a very disturbing thought.

You are so far wrong here, that no amount of spin, denial, lying, or name calling, is going to dig you out.



Yeah yeah, if you say so Ed........ Corporal punishment is abuse no matter what bollocks you like to invent.




PeonForHer -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/19/2013 11:58:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Actually, since you failed to notice, I said it was one of two things, either you forgot about the revolution, or you are practicing that well noted Brit tactic of believing that the way you do it in the UK is the way everyone should do things.

Of course your myopic ability to only grasp one of the two things I stated is rather normal from what I have seen.

This holier than thou crap preached to the rest of the world by Brits is getting rather old. Especially since you dont seem to do a fucking bit of research on what the fuck you are talking about.


You're still talking prejudiced bollocks, JLF. (Or maybe that should be fucking prejudiced bollocks - since lots of 'fuckings' in our posts seem to have become a requirement.) The 'well known' Brit tactic that you're talking about is just your own xenophobic inferiority complex projected on to me. Or all of us Brits - it makes no difference. Whatever - there's nothing for me to answer in your post that has any reason or fact behind it.




Wendel27 -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/19/2013 11:58:44 AM)

 Obviously I can't comment too accurately without knowing the intricacies of your case Freedomdwarf. If your stepson was 17 and made a complaint to Social Services about a criminal matter, in this case assault it would be reported to the Police who are duty bound to investigate. There must have been some evidence to suggest something [regardless if guilty or innocent] if you were charged and taken to court rather than your case being NFA'd in Custody.

Social Services will rarely be able to do anything quickly. Whatthey can do is report certain things to other Agencies who can take certain actions fast. I'm not condoning everything Social Services do but by and large they do a good job under tremendously difficult circumstances. Often they are placed in hideously dichotomous situations with no real damageless option available to them.




Politesub53 -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/19/2013 11:59:27 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

Now the Brits are telling us how to run our country, in the area of guns at least. Evidently they either have failed to remember the revolution or they are stuck in the "our way is a hell of a lot better than anyone else's" mentality.


Ohhhh gawd. It's back to the War of Independence again. [:D] JLF, that's beyond pathetic, and I think you know it. Heads up: It's centuries past the time when it was plausible to complain about a tiny island the other side of the Atlantic bullying the USA. You bully yourselves plenty well enough for any other nation to want to bother. For an example: re-read the title of this thread.


Spot on Peon.

Rule one....... When arguing with a Brit quote the revolution as a blanket excuse. Its pathetic and wont wash.

Love the way they claim to be the worlds finest democracy yet talk of overthrowing the Government. Irony at its finest.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/19/2013 12:00:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
quote:

ORIGINAL: Freedomdwarf1
Ummm... because they couldn't otherwise get their smutty little hands on the guns in the first place to make those killings??


You just don't get it. One other poster said in the US it would take decades to get to where the UK is on gun control. They should have said many decades or a century. Here we have a crap load more people than the UK and a crap load more land with wide open spaces in between the more populated areas. Unlike the UK we have a crap load of people out of our crap load of a population who own firearms along with the notion they're entitled to possess them, you know, the 2nd amendment and all that stuff. Gun control won't go over the same way here as it did in the UK.

That's what they said when rumours started flying about our gun controls after WW1.
They just enacted it into law with the flick of a pen.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
quote:

ORIGINAL:
The US more than pretty much anywhere else on the planet.
However, they don't seem to be able to enforce what laws they have.

There are certainly some gun laws that could be enforced that aren't. A bunch of fuckwitt gun grabbers want to make new restrictive gun laws yet we don't even enforce all the ones we have.

Yep. seems like the want cake and eat it brigade.
On a serious note, if they made the $$'s available to actually go round and enforce the laws that are actually on the statute, severely penalize those who are in breach, I'm sure such killings won't be so prevalent.
Yes, it'll cost money. Lots of it.
How much would you give to make sure everyone in your neighbourhood complied with the law??
All we ever hear is " you can't take my guns away" and the probem still exists to be repeated.






Moonhead -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/19/2013 12:01:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wendel27

Very much so Moonhead. Social Serices have an uphill struggle doing anything at all. The police have limited powers to seize children if they are deemed to be at significant risk but there are strict time constraints on that before judgement is rendered [72 hours] as to whether the children can justifiably be taken into another form of care or returned to their parents/guardians.  It is a very difficult situation not made any easier by hyperbolic media caricatures.

I agree that for many circumstances the Social Services are hard-pressed to make anything happen.
But in other cases it seems so easy and quick-as-lightning.

2 years ago when my step-son was causing all sorts of havoc at home (and oh boy was I glad we don't have guns over here coz we'd all be dead), we had a daily WW3 argument that often went on for hours and hours and frequently well into the early hours of silly o'clock.
One day I was arrested, without warning, and hauled into court for child abuse.
How? What? Where? Why? Who? When??? Fuck!!
Apparently, my step-son had made a formal complaint to Social Services only the day before because I had threatened to "punch him up the side of the head" because he was disturbing the house and the neighbours with his bad behavior and shouting.
It took a lot of explaining what actually happened and I got let off with a suspended "Bound Over" order.
Which reminds me - it lapses at the end of this month.

But it goes to show, sometimes Social Services can do things quickly when they put a mind to it.
And in case you're wondering, step-son is now 19, 6ft3" tall and I'm more than a foot shorter than he is.



So a teenager you didn't (technically) have custody of that point making a legal complaint about you is equivalent to a minor being seized from its parents and put in a care home how, exactly?




Lucylastic -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/19/2013 12:03:10 PM)

considering this is a kink site, and we cant get the difference between discipline and punshment.... there are as many definitions as there are opinions
and why some dont see a spank and a beating in the same box.
WHen I was in school they banned the cane,,,,, corporal punishment was wrong....
throw into the mix societies ills, parents are as bad today as they have ever been. WIthout EVERYONE agreeing that its gonna stop, it wont




mnottertail -> RE: Anotther school shooting. (12/19/2013 12:04:57 PM)

But see here, look what six of the best under mr birchrod has done for that ass.  There was good in it.




Page: <<   < prev  13 14 [15] 16 17   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875