EdBowie
Posts: 875
Joined: 8/11/2013 Status: offline
|
Here's a clue that you are free to ignore... the same way you handwave away the rest of reality. I don't work alone... millions of other people have the same kind of insurance I have, and none of them had it taken away from them, premiums raised from a couple of thousand to 50K, coverage stripped or doctors banned. In other words, you still can't back up any of your predictions with verifiable facts, so you substitute lies and insults as a smokescreen. quote:
ORIGINAL: Phydeaux quote:
ORIGINAL: EdBowie And yet here I am looking around at the real world, where my premiums didn't go up, my coverage didn't go down, my policy wasn't taken away from me, and I'm still using the same doctors. Yes, your own little real world. As if one insurance policy out of hundreds of millions is representative or interesting. What an exagerated sense of importance you have. But lets address that just for humor's sake. So far, Obamacare has only had the opportunity to screw with the insurance of people on the individual insurance. You know - the cherry picked best case for obamacare representing oh what..7% of the insurance market? And if you were from NY, California, Illinois where local dimocrats had already screwed up the local insurance market even more than the feds - you would benefit. Now of course the odds are that you are either covered in a business (2014) or a union (2015). So you wouldn't be expected to be hosed yet. The truly amazing thing, is that if I weren't a kool-aid drinking dimocrat I'd be going .. holy shit.. we're going to do this with a market TEN TIMES bigger next year? I'd be having second and third thoughts. Hell - a lot of them are probably buying vowels from vanna around now. Ah but dims trolls are marching in lockstep... Onward! So, in conclusion. You wouldn't hardly be expected to be affected now would you. And its funny - I don't recall a single dim coming on here and saying you know - my premiums have increased. Funny how that works.
< Message edited by EdBowie -- 12/20/2013 1:11:45 AM >
_____________________________
Reading for understanding, instead of for argumentation, has its advantages.
|