LadyHugs
Posts: 2299
Joined: 1/1/2004 Status: offline
|
Dear subedana, slavejali, Ladies and Gentlemen; In many cases, people have a different view of what 'micro-management means and what requires micro-management.' As to your explaination of what Micro-management meant to you, I personally wouldn't want to be a micro-manager to that degree. I would become a warden/prison guard and wouldn't have free time to kick up my high heels and be myself. Besides, why should I want to watch a slave to void their natural waste products every single time? However, being a dominant; I would have the freedom to step in and see what the slave is doing, how they are doing it and other supervision of tasks, behaviors and such. I do sit and watch slaves in the kitchen work, clean and such. I am watching and it could be considered 'supervising' but, it can easily be my feasting on their service and admiring them, appreciating them while they did such things. If there is something new, I will supervise the slave until they do it to my expectations, perform it without having to ask questions or the need for supervision. I've also supervised the settings of formal tables and dinners, as this is not an every day affair, such as the daily meals and tea. Same with a new 'dish' or 'desert.' quote:
ORIGINAL: subedana Micromanaging to me is managing the subs life and time down to the minute detail. What they eat drink, how they spend their time, money, etc. But not just that, said dominate is looking over sholder of the sub while their doing what ever. quote:
ORIGINAL: slavejali Can someone give me an example of exactly what micro-managing a slave is? How it actually plays out? What is micro-managing to you subedana? Is it: 1. The dominant tells the submissive what to do and how to do it every single time? Even if the action is repetitive? As in there are no expectations of "This will be done everyday this way" and then thats that. 2. Is it that the dominant manages every part of the relationship but that doesnt mean instructions have to be repeated? Basically amounts to a dominant knowing what they like and how they like it done and instructs the submissive to do so, without any leeway for the submissive to misinterpret? 3. Is it simply that the dominant prefers the submissive not to input at all on how things could be done? Sorry if this is doing a side-line to this thread: but I'd like to know what micro-management actually entails so I can understand the thread more. What is in my mind's eye about this inquiry, is wondering if the dominant is insecure and or a control freak (which can be good), to where such a dominant never 'learned' the art of 'being served.' It is an issue for new dominants, to give reins over to their slave/submissive and have them do things, the dominant can do themselves very well. It might just be such a case. So, it is something to be considered and understood, that being served is a practiced behavior as much as one who is serving learns to serve through practice. Respectfully submitted for consideration, Lady Hugs
|