Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: N C home invasion shows that NC is civilized state


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: N C home invasion shows that NC is civilized state Page: <<   < prev  11 12 13 14 [15]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: N C home invasion shows that NC is civilized state - 2/3/2014 1:10:51 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel
You know like when you refer to gun enthusiests with positions slighty different than your own as "gun grabbers".

I don't do that....Have you ever seen arestrictive gun law you didn't like?


Sorry about misunderstanding your misquoted statement.

But don't claim you don't do something and then turn around and do it in the very same post. That's just an insult to the intelligence of those of us who's IQ's have all three digits.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 281
RE: N C home invasion shows that NC is civilized state - 2/3/2014 6:34:46 PM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Milesnmiles


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: Milesnmiles


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: Milesnmiles


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
...
the Zimmerman thing
...
Personally, I believe that Zimmerman should be behind bars.
The stand your ground law is for those who are minding their own business and are attacked.
Zimmerman was not out on a casual evening walk, he loaded up a gun and took it with him to "patrol the neighborhood", basically looking for trouble. When he called it in, instead of doing what he was told to do and let the police handle it, instead of walking away he decided to confront the young man. Thus He precipitated the whole confrontation and when it escalated, he shot and killed the young man. Zimmerman had any number of ways to avert the situation but took none of them and so this was in no way a case of self-defense.



I think you need to go back and review the facts.

First off it wasn't a stand your ground case. He didn't load up a gun looking for trouble, he has a permit and always kept it with him. He didn't go out on patrol, he was on his way back from the store when he noticed Martin. He wasn't told to let the police handle it, he was told he didn't need to follow Martin. He didn't confront the young man, the young man confronted him. He may have precipitated the confrontation by being obvious, following Martin, but Martin would not have been shot had he not pummeled Zimmerman. I will agree that Zimmerman is a dumb ass for being less than stealthy while trying to follow but I can't find any laws against that. IMO the incident was an unfortunate freak of nature.
Okay, this is what I found;
The fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman took place on the night of February 26, 2012, in Sanford, Florida, United States. Martin was a 17-year-old African American high school student. George Zimmerman, a 28-year-old mixed-race Hispanic, was the neighborhood watch coordinator for the gated community where Martin was temporarily staying and where the shooting took place. According to Zimmerman's subsequent testimony, Zimmerman shot Martin, who was unarmed, during an altercation between the two. Responding to an earlier call from Zimmerman, police arrived on the scene within two minutes of the shooting. Zimmerman was taken into custody, treated for head injuries, then questioned for five hours. The police chief said that Zimmerman was released because there was no evidence to refute Zimmerman's claim of having acted in self-defense, and that under Florida's Stand Your Ground statute, the police were prohibited by law from making an arrest. The police chief also said that Zimmerman had had a right to defend himself with lethal force. As news of the case spread, thousands of protestors across the country called for Zimmerman's arrest and a full investigation. Six weeks after the shooting, amid widespread, intense, and in some cases misleading media coverage, Zimmerman was charged with murder by a special prosecutor appointed by Governor Rick Scott.

Zimmerman's trial began on June 10, 2013, in Sanford. On July 13, 2013, a jury acquitted him of second-degree murder and of manslaughter charges.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Trayvon_Martin

On the night of February 26, 2012, Zimmerman was patrolling the Retreat at Twin Lakes, a town-house development in Sanford, Florida. At 7:09 P.M., Zimmerman called the non-emergency police-response line. (He did not call 911.)

The call begins with Zimmerman reporting a suspicious person walking around in the rain. Zimmerman says, “We’ve had some break-ins in my neighborhood, and there’s a real suspicious guy.” He describes an unknown male “just walking around looking about” in the rain and says, “This guy looks like he is up to no good or he is on drugs or something.” Almost immediately, the dispatcher asks (Zimmerman does not volunteer the information) the subject’s race, and Zimmerman answers, “Black.” In a later observation during the call, Zimmerman confirms that the person is black. Zimmerman reports that the person has his hand in his waistband and is walking around looking at homes. Zimmerman says, further, “These assholes, they always get away.”

The dispatcher appears at first to be asking Zimmerman to keep an eye on the person. “Just let me know if this guy does anything else,” he says. A little later, Zimmerman says, “He’s running.” (Does the fact that Martin was running suggest that he was up to no good, or does it suggest that the young man was running away from Zimmerman?) The dispatcher asks, “He’s running? Which way is he running?” Again, this is an important point. It’s the dispatcher asking (for a second time) Zimmerman to watch the person.

At this point, Zimmerman follows Martin, eventually losing sight of him. The dispatcher asks, “Are you following him?” When Zimmerman answers, “Yeah,” the dispatcher says, “We don’t need you to do that.” Zimmerman responds, “O.K.” This is probably the best-known part of the exchange. The dispatcher says don’t follow him, one theory goes, Zimmerman does anyway, and that causes the fatal confrontation. But this view of the facts obscures the earlier part of the call—when the dispatcher appears to be asking Zimmerman to follow and report the person’s movements. The call ends when Zimmerman gives the dispatcher information about how the police should find him (Zimmerman, that is) in the complex. Zimmerman asks that the police call him upon their arrival so he can provide his location. Zimmerman ends the call at 7:13 P.M. The first police officer arrived on the scene at 7:17 P.M., by which time Trayvon Martin was already dead.

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2013/07/the-facts-in-the-george-zimmerman-trial.html




That really doesn't confirm most of the things I corrected from your earlier post to me. As for the part about "patrolling", I recall that he was on the way to or maybe it was from the store and not on his regular patrol. Also the dispatcher said, "we don't need you to do that" in response to Zimmermans affirmative response to the question, "are you following him".
That's the problem you are going on what you "recall", while I posted two sources with reasonable reliability.
As for your "corrections" you continue to say Zimmerman was returning from the store but the "New Yorker" article say he "was patrolling."
You corrected me saying; "it wasn't a stand your ground case", whereas wikipedia says it was a "stand your ground case."

As for this; "Also the dispatcher said, "we don't need you to do that" in response to Zimmermans affirmative response to the question, "are you following him", at that point it was indicated to Zimmerman, there was no need to follow and if he had stopped at that point and gone home no one would have died.
So I reiterate what I said earlier; "Zimmerman had any number of ways to avert the situation but took none of them and so this was in no way a case of self-defense."



My bad, I recall was a poor choice of words. The fact is, Zimmerman was on the way to the freakin store when he spotted Martin. I don't care what the New Yorker said. They're not the only ones who didn't get their facts straight.


It doesn't matter who or how many call it a stand your ground case, it simply wasn't but if you can show me where in all the motions or in the actual trial SYG came up then I'll believe you. Just because some in the media and others were ballyhooing SYG doesn't make it so.

As for ceasing to follow, Zimmerman did stop following and started on his way back to his truck. It was on his way back to his truck that he was assaulted by Martin.

Certainly if Zimmerman wouldn't have exited his truck the whole thing might never have happened but nothing Zimmerman did was illegal.

_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to Milesnmiles)
Profile   Post #: 282
RE: N C home invasion shows that NC is civilized state - 2/3/2014 7:40:47 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel
You know like when you refer to gun enthusiests with positions slighty different than your own as "gun grabbers".

I don't do that....Have you ever seen arestrictive gun law you didn't like?


Sorry about misunderstanding your misquoted statement.

But don't claim you don't do something and then turn around and do it in the very same post. That's just an insult to the intelligence of those of us who's IQ's have all three digits.


I notice you didn't answer my question.
You may have opposed one but I can't think of any.
You might want to review the difference between making an accusation and asking a question.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 2/3/2014 7:48:52 PM >


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 283
RE: N C home invasion shows that NC is civilized state - 2/3/2014 8:07:41 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
"Man greets a Girl Scout selling cookies with a gun pointed at her"





http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2014/02/02/man-allegedly-pulls-gun-on-girl-scout-selling-cookies/

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 284
RE: N C home invasion shows that NC is civilized state - 2/4/2014 5:58:23 AM   
Milesnmiles


Posts: 1349
Joined: 12/28/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
I understand but the articles you accepted were wrong.
Great! The problem, you haven't provided any articles to contradict those articles, just your recall. I mean if the articles you are talking about come from the National Enquirer, I'm going to go with Wikipedia and the New Yorker. Just saying...
;-)
Oops, that's what I get for stepping out for a minute, commenting on something without knowing more has been posted.

< Message edited by Milesnmiles -- 2/4/2014 6:04:39 AM >

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 285
RE: N C home invasion shows that NC is civilized state - 2/4/2014 2:55:02 PM   
Milesnmiles


Posts: 1349
Joined: 12/28/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
My bad, I recall was a poor choice of words. The fact is, Zimmerman was on the way to the freakin store when he spotted Martin. I don't care what the New Yorker said. They're not the only ones who didn't get their facts straight.


It doesn't matter who or how many call it a stand your ground case, it simply wasn't but if you can show me where in all the motions or in the actual trial SYG came up then I'll believe you. Just because some in the media and others were ballyhooing SYG doesn't make it so.

As for ceasing to follow, Zimmerman did stop following and started on his way back to his truck. It was on his way back to his truck that he was assaulted by Martin.

Certainly if Zimmerman wouldn't have exited his truck the whole thing might never have happened but nothing Zimmerman did was illegal.
I guess the question I have is if Zimmerman walked to the store, where did he get the truck he was walking back to?
;-)

(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 286
RE: N C home invasion shows that NC is civilized state - 2/4/2014 3:32:43 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
I notice you didn't answer my question.


I've explained my position a number of times and it's quite similar to those of the other gun enthusiasts in this thread that you're arguing against. I think the problem may be that my position doesn't translate well into gun-nut. It simply isn't going to make sense to the sort of gun enthusiasts who are prone to hoarding ammo in their paranoia shelters and unabomber shacks.

With that in mind I'm going to try using a picture to point something out to you. Perhaps it will aid in reinforcing a point I've been making.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by GotSteel -- 2/4/2014 3:33:02 PM >

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 287
RE: N C home invasion shows that NC is civilized state - 2/4/2014 4:04:56 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Milesnmiles


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
My bad, I recall was a poor choice of words. The fact is, Zimmerman was on the way to the freakin store when he spotted Martin. I don't care what the New Yorker said. They're not the only ones who didn't get their facts straight.


It doesn't matter who or how many call it a stand your ground case, it simply wasn't but if you can show me where in all the motions or in the actual trial SYG came up then I'll believe you. Just because some in the media and others were ballyhooing SYG doesn't make it so.

As for ceasing to follow, Zimmerman did stop following and started on his way back to his truck. It was on his way back to his truck that he was assaulted by Martin.

Certainly if Zimmerman wouldn't have exited his truck the whole thing might never have happened but nothing Zimmerman did was illegal.
I guess the question I have is if Zimmerman walked to the store, where did he get the truck he was walking back to?
;-)


He was on the way back home in his truck when he spotted Martin.
The fact that he was in his truck should be clear from the transcript of his call.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Milesnmiles)
Profile   Post #: 288
RE: N C home invasion shows that NC is civilized state - 2/4/2014 4:07:15 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
I notice you didn't answer my question.


I've explained my position a number of times and it's quite similar to those of the other gun enthusiasts in this thread that you're arguing against. I think the problem may be that my position doesn't translate well into gun-nut. It simply isn't going to make sense to the sort of gun enthusiasts who are prone to hoarding ammo in their paranoia shelters and unabomber shacks.

With that in mind I'm going to try using a picture to point something out to you. Perhaps it will aid in reinforcing a point I've been making.






So you won't answer my question, I am trying to be fair to you but clearly you would rather
engage in name calling and disparaging anyone who disagrees with you.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 289
RE: N C home invasion shows that NC is civilized state - 2/4/2014 7:37:02 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel



So you won't answer my question, I am trying to be fair to you but clearly you would rather
engage in name calling and disparaging anyone who disagrees with you.


*Face palm*

Clear, demonstrable evidence that I'm not for "gun grabbing" and you still don't get it...

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 290
RE: N C home invasion shows that NC is civilized state - 2/4/2014 7:44:15 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

quote:


quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel



So you won't answer my question, I am trying to be fair to you but clearly you would rather
engage in name calling and disparaging anyone who disagrees with you.


*Face palm*

Clear, demonstrable evidence that I'm not for "gun grabbing" and you still don't get it...

Where is this alleged evidence.
I have not, to the best of my recollection called you, personally, a gun grabber.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 2/4/2014 7:47:01 PM >


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 291
Page:   <<   < prev  11 12 13 14 [15]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: N C home invasion shows that NC is civilized state Page: <<   < prev  11 12 13 14 [15]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078