|
Tkman117 -> RE: Evolution/Creation debate (2/10/2014 1:47:33 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:
ORIGINAL: Tkman117
What evidence is there that they aren't homo sapiens? I would like to see that evidence, or if you have already posted it, could you please reference the post #?
The major differences are that these people had a larger cranial vault, i.e., a bigger brain, and their skulls lack the characteristic sagittal suture, exhibiting instead only a single parietal plate (last image).
K.
Did a bit of research and found this:
http://hiddenincatours.com/elongated-skulls-of-paracas-a-people-and-their-world/
quote:
What you are capable of doing via this technique is to change the shape of the skull, but not the actual volume; you can alter the shape, but not the size. However, Tello found several skulls, at least 90 at the site called Cerro Colorado adjacent to the main graveyard in Paracas, which had cranial volume larger, and in some cases 2.5 times larger than a conventional modern human skull. How is this possible? As I have said, deformation can alter shape, but not the volume of bone material, and certainly not twice as much.
It is therefore obvious that we are dealing with 2 different phenomena; elongation through binding, and elongation via genetics. The Paracas skulls are the largest found in the world, but from what root race stock would they have originated? To suggest that the natural elongation was the result of hydrocephaly or some other clinical condition is ridiculous, when one takes into account that again, at least 90 of them were found by Tello, and no one knows how many are still under the earth, in private collections, or gathering dust in museum warehouses in Peru, and beyond. Hydrocephaly would tend to make the skull expand evenly, making them more round than elongated.
|
|
|
|
