RE: Shallow/superficial women? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message

FieryOpal -> RE: Shallow/superficial women? (2/14/2014 11:40:34 PM)

There are many women who respect veterans and those in military uniform. I'm one of them, although I'm not what you're looking for. Notice I said "women" and not "girls," because with your wide orb from 20-60 year-olds, you just want a female. There are fake profiles which abound, so your zeroing in on the "slutty"-sounding ones tells me you are more than likely getting yourself worked up on phony baloney profiles of non-existent 25-year-olds. And even if they did exist, they might be seeking a single Sugar Daddy Dom to take care of them, one they stand a chance of building a future with. What can you offer them along those lines? Nothing remotely comparable, so what do you expect?

Now, let's take your being disabled and your age out of the equation, not to mention your side of the kneel. Here are my (pre-)deal breakers. This is to give you a reality check, not to cut you down in any way.

- You must be single and completely unattached. No steady girlfriend, baby mama you get down & dirty with, assorted play partners, none of that.
- I'm only attracted to tall men, 5'10" and taller. Pff-f-t.
- You have to be well-endowed with thick girth. Sorry, but I can't be with a man if I'm constantly wishing his member was bigger than it is. Same goes for the height.
- Missing limb(s) I could overlook. A penile implant isn't going to give me the responses I want, and part of my excitement is derived from knowing my partner is experiencing pleasurable sensations. A permanently induced erection doesn't give me the feedback I need either.
(I'm not saying that this is what you have, it's just part of the list.)

I haven't even covered personality, intelligence, being good company, sense of humor, financial stability, mental stability, no anger issues, nearby location, on and on. I'm sure you have your own criteria as well, your own mental image of what you want. In all sincerity, would you take up with a submissive female counterpart of yourself?



thinkyoucanhang -> RE: Shallow/superficial women? (2/15/2014 12:11:11 AM)

To correct you, I said, "30-50. 10 up/10 down."

And had you read the thread, you would have seen some of that was redacted. When it was already pointed out, I got carried away in my anger. I even apologized.



thinkyoucanhang -> RE: Shallow/superficial women? (2/15/2014 12:50:05 AM)

Quit beating a dead horse here folks.

Ever think I'm SICK of people telling me how to act? I'm not going to change just because you're uncomfortable.

Quit ignoring me or acting like I'm invisible in public, then I won't act out. It's that simple.



FieryOpal -> RE: Shallow/superficial women? (2/15/2014 12:59:55 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thinkyoucanhang

To correct you, I said, "30-50. 10 up/10 down."

And had you read the thread, you would have seen some of that was redacted. When it was already pointed out, I got carried away in my anger. I even apologized.

(30)-10 down= 20
(50)+10 up= 60
Therefore your age range spread is 20-60.
I believe I added & subtracted accurately.

Did your marital status, height and penis size get redacted? Be realistic instead of blaming women for your woes.

You did calm down, but you still have anger issues, compounded by whatever PTSD you are suffering.

I believe that if you could get yourself out from under this cloud of negativity, you have tremendous wells of strength and courage you have learned to draw upon, and so I do wish you well. Soldier on.



angelikaJ -> RE: Shallow/superficial women? (2/15/2014 1:08:05 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal


quote:

ORIGINAL: thinkyoucanhang

To correct you, I said, "30-50. 10 up/10 down."

And had you read the thread, you would have seen some of that was redacted. When it was already pointed out, I got carried away in my anger. I even apologized.

(30)-10 down= 20
(50)+10 up= 60
Therefore your age range spread is 20-60.
I believe I added & subtracted accurately.

Did your marital status, height and penis size get redacted? Be realistic instead of blaming women for your woes.

You did calm down, but you still have anger issues, compounded by whatever PTSD you are suffering.

I believe that if you could get yourself out from under this cloud of negativity, you have tremendous wells of strength and courage you have learned to draw upon, and so I do wish you well. Soldier on.


You are misreading him.
10 up and 10 down of his age.

So, 30-50 is what he means. (+/- a year perhaps)



angelikaJ -> RE: Shallow/superficial women? (2/15/2014 1:09:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thinkyoucanhang

"As atrocious as your local VA may be, it still offers treatment for PTSD.
It still offers mental health services and it probably offers treatment for TBI (in the event that is part of your woundedness).
As atrocious as it may be, you still probably need some of those services."


That's a hoot! (sarcasm) They have MH yet the Dr's barely speak English and you're lucky to see them every few months. That equals out to about an HOUR OR 2 A YEAR.

I have yet to receive any MH assistance for my TBI's and all they do is throw pills at me for the 15-30 minute appointments...

Quite impressive! most folks would never even guess TBI.




You still have unread mail.




FieryOpal -> RE: Shallow/superficial women? (2/15/2014 1:17:24 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: angelikaJ

You are misreading him.
10 up and 10 down of his age.

So, 30-50 is what he means. (+/- a year perhaps)

I didn't know OP meant in relation to his own age, or that it's 41. Thanks, angelikaJ, and sorry for the misunderstanding on this point. When I specify an age range, I give or take by 1-2 years, so that's what I thought up/down stood for as in plus/minus.

[Edited to verify exact profile age.]



thinkyoucanhang -> RE: Shallow/superficial women? (2/15/2014 1:35:03 AM)

I'm 41. I used 40 as a base line.

40 - 10 = 30
40 + 10 = 50

Sigh.

Not angry just frustrated this dead horse keeps getting beaten. I'm trying to use logic rather than emotion repeating myself. It's a very old habit of trying to correct folks. I admit when I'm wrong, I just wish folks would take the time to read or get facts straight and admit they're wrong. Also, nowhere did I mention size.

This is the song that never ends,
it goes on and on my friends...



needlesandpins -> RE: Shallow/superficial women? (2/15/2014 1:44:07 AM)

op, I haven't bothered reading your profile because I have read the whole thread. it's true that we all have the right to be the person that we are, however, other people don't have to like that person. they have the right to point out that the person we put over is actually coming over as not that great. based entirely on what I have read here, and leaving your disabilities aside entirely, I wouldn't have anything to do with you either.

you are married. you are not in the forces any more, and people don't have to do as you tell them at double quick time, get over it. you are 5'5, an inch shorter than myself, so that goes against my preferences too because I like tall men. I'd have read your posts on this side, and seen that you have an attitude that I don't really like.

all that, and I haven't even taken in to consideration your abilities yet. as a Dom, you don't show behaviour that is consistent of someone that I'd want to give myself over to.

stamina, that is worth nothing to me if the sex I'm getting isn't great. guys do brag about the size of their cocks all the time for sure, and you'll see that most of us women don't care about that either.

so you stay exactly as you are, but don't be surprised when you get the same results too.

needles



FieryOpal -> RE: Shallow/superficial women? (2/15/2014 1:45:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thinkyoucanhang

In reply to a few points:

3) I said stamina, not great sex. I've been told I'm good but how does one really know? Other than sheet soaking sessions, I don't know. Some guys brag about having massive manhood's and no one blinks an eye, they could be one pump chumps for all one knows.


In my experience, no man with a large one would say this. My experience could be severely limited, however.

Obviously age 41 is close to 40, and when I double-checked I saw that. No discrepancy there.



thinkyoucanhang -> RE: Shallow/superficial women? (2/15/2014 1:46:29 AM)

T?hank you Angelika. Sprichst du Deutch? Your name is spelled in that manner.

I checked my mail, nothing came through.



thinkyoucanhang -> RE: Shallow/superficial women? (2/15/2014 2:15:37 AM)

Thank you for your honesty.

My frustration probably came across as the anger it started out as. I originally just wanted input and got all this...

Holy balls, I didn't expect such rabid replies in vast quantities being rather new here.

I was under the impression that my former life was still in sync with the Lifestyle. At least it was before my 'break'...

I feel like that old C&W song: He's an old hippy and he don't know what to do. Should he hang on to the old? Should he latch on to the new?

Part of why it worked so well for me then was subs did what you said, before you said it. Not this I'll do it when I want, if I want vibe. Then again, my subs were also Soldiers or from surrounding Army base areas.



thinkyoucanhang -> RE: Shallow/superficial women? (2/15/2014 2:35:46 AM)

Still doesn't add up to 20-60. Even in my 20's & 30's I went up. Anything below 30 is usually too immature. I value conversation, not just the physical aspect.

And some guys just don't care to brag on size either but won't hesitate to bust on someone for their other inadequacies.

I know what I have and am content. Women say size don't matter, why then make a fuss about it? They either like it or they don't and that works both ways.



LadyPact -> RE: Shallow/superficial women? (2/15/2014 2:36:31 AM)

You may not like this response, but I promise that I'm trying to help.

Have you ever seen a flick titled, "Almost An Angel?" Crappy flick, really. Failed at the box office. Horrible reviews. All of that stuff. However, it had this one really good exchange that I think is appropriate here.

The movie stars Paul Hogan (ala Crocodile Dundee, but plays Terry in this movie) and he comes across this guy named Steve, (who is a disabled guy) in a bar one night. Now, Steve is kind of a jerk, but people let him get away with it because he happens to be in a wheelchair. Basically, Steve is treating everybody like shit for one reason or another, taking his crap out on other people when he runs across Terry. I have to paraphrase this next part a bit because it's been a while since I've seen the movie.

In frustration, Steve tells Terry that he's sick to death of people seeing a man in a chair. Terry tells him that he doesn't see a man in a chair. More likely, he sees an asshole who happens to be in a chair and he's going to treat him just like anybody else. Kind of like what I'm about to do here, now.

I'm not going to treat you like a man in a chair. I'm going to talk to you like I would any other person who would like to call themselves Dominant. If I do less than that, I'm no better than the person who sent you that email, because I'm putting the chair in a position of more importance than the man.

You want to be treated like everybody else? Then throw your hat in the ring and show people why they should chose you instead of somebody else. Like it or not, the competition is fierce and there is no "go to the head of the line" because you're in a chair and this is not like waiting on a ride at Disney World. The ability to bark orders at privates doesn't make you Dominant. You have certain restrictions that show the average person that you can't do all of the things that tops do. That means you have to have *something* worth having. Women can get fucked anywhere. Why should they want to fuck you?

By the way, I happen to be a military wife and the mother of a military soldier. If My other half came home with that attitude, I'd be pulling rank as Household Six.



needlesandpins -> RE: Shallow/superficial women? (2/15/2014 2:42:00 AM)

well one thing for sure on this side of things is that we tell it as we find it. we don't do the 'there, there' stuff because we are not your mum.

your former life; if by that you are talking about the forces, it was never in sync with this lifestyle. the only place that behaviour is fitting is in the forces. I'm not a subordinate in the forces, and I don't want to be treated like one either. I'm not a soldier, I'm a person with a personality all of my own. may be you need to take that in to consideration too in your search.

needles



Rule -> RE: Shallow/superficial women? (2/15/2014 2:50:02 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thinkyoucanhang
I am sick of shallow women!

I do not mind shallow women. I just wish that I could cure my herpes.

Tell you what: Fuck them shallow women and get out of the door. Go shoot at a rifle range. Go fish where there are fish. Climb a mountain. Go see the Niagara falls. Have a laugh.



MissKittyDeVine -> RE: Shallow/superficial women? (2/15/2014 3:16:19 AM)


So you can dish it out but you can't take it.

Yes, you were dealt a rough hand. Everybody has their own trials to deal with. Behaving like an obnoxious prick to others is not on, whatever justification you think you have for your anger there are norms that should be respected. I'm sorry that your service ended up in disability. No soldier deserves that, even if they know the risks when they sign up. But remember that not everyone is in favor of recent military campaigns, and your anger should be directed against the US government, not individuals who owe you nothing personally in return for your service.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thinkyoucanhang

My frustration probably came across as the anger it started out as. I originally just wanted input and got all this...

Holy balls, I didn't expect such rabid replies in vast quantities being rather new here.



ARIES83 -> RE: Shallow/superficial women? (2/15/2014 3:24:11 AM)

You know Rule, your posts seem somewhat different from when I use to be on the forum last year.
I don't think I've read anything thus far that wasn't pretty reasonable both in structure and content.
Last year it was like the diary of a madman. [8D]



thinkyoucanhang -> RE: Shallow/superficial women? (2/15/2014 3:24:23 AM)

Point taken Ma'am... Gotta listen to HH-6! lol

I never saw the movie.

I can be an asshole at times and never claimed otherwise, though I can be quite the gentleman too. I have one of those reactive personalities. Much depends on how I perceive my environment. Something you probably understand being overseas and not knowing the language there.

Fight or flight? I think the answer to that is fairly obvious which pertains to me...

I don't mean to go into the asshole mode, it just seems like second nature now. It's very rare to get talked to, not at, above, down to, etc. I hear, "You can't" so much from other people you get tired of it and want to fight back firing off both volleys in the process.



thinkyoucanhang -> RE: Shallow/superficial women? (2/15/2014 3:32:40 AM)

Last year? I've only been on here a couple weeks. 1/31/14



Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.699707E-02