RE: Will banning Craigslist save lives? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Politesub53 -> RE: Will banning Craigslist save lives? (2/20/2014 4:11:57 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Even if the target is human that is not automatically bad, and when it is it is not the choice of the gun.


Clearly the argument a ten year old kid would make. Its like saying nuclear weapons are okay as they dont make you dead. Its fucking absurdity gone into overdrive.




Lucylastic -> RE: Will banning Craigslist save lives? (2/20/2014 4:57:09 AM)

If the gun was to make a choice wether to fire or not , there wouldnt be any deaths by gun




TheHeretic -> RE: Will banning Craigslist save lives? (2/20/2014 6:23:42 AM)

Oh good Lord...




Lucylastic -> RE: Will banning Craigslist save lives? (2/20/2014 6:43:44 AM)

yeah pathetic:) gmorning...
up for some stalking today????

IMMMMMmmmmmmm READYYYYYYYYY




BamaD -> RE: Will banning Craigslist save lives? (2/20/2014 10:08:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117

The point about guns most liberals try to make but conservatives don't understand is that we generally don't want to BAN guns. We are generally in favour of reasonable safety and registry regulations. Now, if we are talking about banning guns. Answer this: what is the original purpose of the gun? What was it built to do? And before you answer with "it's designed to propel metal at high velocity" also answer WHY this was originally desired. Simple answer, but I'd lile to hear it from you guys.



Guns are tools for making things dead. Clear enough?

I raised my own question on another thread recently, so perhaps you'll be willing to answer where nobody there was. Why do anti-gun folks always seem to assume the only possible target of that metal being projected at high speed is another human being (only maybe with game as an afterthought)?

When I talk about having guns for protection, the main things I have in mind are rattlesnakes and feral dogs. Home intrusion is not unheard of here, and I have one of those quirky jobs where I get the odd death threat, but the first line of defense in my house is a couple of big loud dogs, and I have faster access to some nasty medieval weapon than I do to a firearm, when I'm sitting in the living room watching TV.



Even if the target is human that is not automatically bad, and when it is it is not the choice of the gun.

I made this post when half asleep.
To make it more clear.
If the target is a human bent on killing you he brought it on himself.
If the gun is misused the blame is on the user.




Politesub53 -> RE: Will banning Craigslist save lives? (2/20/2014 10:36:38 AM)

Lol...... Nothing to do with my post by any chance.

It isnt the first time you have said guns dont kill people, people kill people.




BamaD -> RE: Will banning Craigslist save lives? (2/20/2014 10:53:19 AM)

FR

I thought this was about people doing evil things, not another bash gun owners thread.




mnottertail -> RE: Will banning Craigslist save lives? (2/20/2014 11:00:03 AM)

No, its a bash idiots thread, and therefore he is on topic.  




Politesub53 -> RE: Will banning Craigslist save lives? (2/20/2014 3:35:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

I thought this was about people doing evil things, not another bash gun owners thread.



FR......... still got me on hide I see..... [8|]

You made it about guns in the OP.......... if you dont like the replies then you should have just stuck with the facts of the case in hand.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
2.734375E-02