DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen quote:
ORIGINAL: thishereboi I don't have a problem with a business owner making the decision not to serve gays. In fact I think they should put a sign in their window stating that so I know to take my money elsewhere. I don't understand why someone would want to support a business that takes this stand, yet not only do they want to, they go to court for the right to do so. Sorry but I don't like giving my hard earned cash to bigots. While I think they have the right to feel the way they do for what ever reason, I also have the right to shop elsewhere. I am sure there is a gay friendly equivalent that would welcome the extra business. And if there isn't? What about towns with one pharmacy? or some other service? Would you be so sanguine then? There is that internet thingy... So, what you would have is an underserved portion of the population. Know what the Market calls that? Opportunity Some entrepreneur will see the opportunity and take advantage of it. This will also likely place economic pressure on the discriminating business, to change or fail. Boy, that would surely suck if the Market were allowed to work... Do you know any black people older than about 60? Ask them if they ever traveled before 1970. See how the market worked for them. Have you not noticed that things have changed? I have acknowledged that the conditions were such that Government needed to act. I even stated that it was a sad commentary that government had to act. Perhaps you haven't noticed, but, in general, society isn't as discriminatory as it was then. The changes that have happened in the infrastructure of the US (and world) certainly makes the landscape different and more even, regardless of racism. Some dumbass punk gets killed across the country, and you can hear about it within hours. How quickly do we hear of events in Sochi? FFS, we can see them real-time, if we want. It's an awful lot harder to get away with bullshit now than it was back then. You seem to want to live as if the past realities are still in effect when they are not. You want the US Constitution changed to reflect changing realities, but don't want government action to change with changing realities. Go figure.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|