Politesub53 -> RE: Dhimmi status is back in style (3/2/2014 7:10:51 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri It's not the same scenario, but it doesn't have to be. It was still religious discrimination and intolerance. Muslims had places to pray in NY, already. This wouldn't have been the first mosque. Of course its not the same scenario, thats the whole fucking point. You seem to think you need to point out the fact that extreme terrorists, are indeed extreme terrorists. How the hell you can keep a straight face by introducing peaceful Muslims wishing to build a Mosque into the equation is beyond me. Well, let me put it into short words for you, then... Bad things were said about those people who were against the mosque being built where it was sited. And, not that you get it, but those who opposed the mosque being built because it was a mosque, were bigoted against Muslims/Islam. Now, we have Muslims that are being bullies (wouldn't want you to get lost with a form of the word oppression) against Christians simply because they oppose Christianity. Religious bigotry all the same, no? And, the example I brought up wasn't about Muslims wanting to build a mosque, but about the furor that happened because they wanted to build the mosque. My example was bigotry against Muslims. Religious bigotry is religious bigotry, regardless of whether it's against Christians, Muslims, Jews, Buddhist, Atheists, etc. Whoosh, and reality flies right over your head. This isnt about Muslim bigotry, its about terrorist extortionism to build funds. I said in post 12 the sources you quoted where alarmist bullshit. You replied in post 13 "So thats okay" You also said "call a spade a spade" I will go one better and call your bullshit, bullshit, and your flimsy attempt to link terror with building a mosque, more bullshit. You do see the difference between a Muslim and a terrorist organisation, do you not ?
|
|
|
|