freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Dhimmi status is back in style (3/2/2014 6:25:47 PM)
|
FR~ I think most of the arguments here are talking cross-purposes. Extremists are extremists of all (mainly) Islamic faiths. But the groups are being pushed forth as part of the arguments and they don't all belong together. Much like Protestants and Catholics and Evangelists etc are all 'lumped together' as "Christians", there are many different factions within the Islamic faith. Sunni and Shea and Muslims being the the most popular; but there are also AQ and various other smaller and more extreme groups. So, as much as Jihadists of differing Islamic groups fight with both Christians as well as within the Islamic factions, the world is seeing this as a more global Islam Vs Christian clash. But (and this is very important), factions within each group love and hate each other just as vehemently as with other religions outside of their 'umbrella' group. So yes, Muslims are fighting Muslims - but that is usually one more specific element fighting against a different specific element (ie, Shea/Sunni/AQ etc) but rarely within themselves. There are certain Islamic factions extorting money from Christians in Syria (and some other places) but it is wrong to use a blanket group description of Muslims or Islamics because they are very specific religions doing the extorting. As for the loud voices against the Muslims wanting to build a mosque next to ground zero, it was just bad taste and those who were not Muslim didn't want a permanent reminder that a group of extremist Muslims caused so many deaths in one single event. It wasn't the fact it was a mosque but the fact it was a mosque in that particular location. And many people, wrongly IMHO, labeled those specific extremists as 'Muslims' in general and thus took exception to a Muslim place of worship being built near ground zero. Two completely different scenarios with different reasons. So to formulate an argument on either side, it would be disingenuous to use generic terms like Muslim or Christian - you would need to be more specific otherwise confusion runs amok and makes no sense in what is being conveyed. Ergo, cross-talk and misunderstanding.
|
|
|
|