Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Idaho passes Agricultural gag bill


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Idaho passes Agricultural gag bill Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Idaho passes Agricultural gag bill - 2/28/2014 5:04:12 PM   
igor2003


Posts: 1718
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
In 2012 an animal rights group from California, Mercy for Animals, took some undercover video of the abuse of dairy cows at a dairy near Twin Falls, Idaho. Here is the story from a news broadcast made at the time.

http://www.ktvb.com/home/Dairy-owner-speaks-out-after-release-of-shocking-undercover-video-173632071.html

First, I do think this was an isolated incident. However, the wonderful conservative leadership of this great state decided to make sure this kind of thing could never happen again. No...not the abuse of the animals. Butch Otter, governor of Idaho, today signed a bill making it illegal to do undercover filming in agricultural settings! This bill stemmed directly from the incident listed above.

http://www.ktvb.com/news/Gov-Otter-signs-Agriculture-Security-Bill-247888361.html?can=n

Okay, right now I'm just fuming.


_____________________________

If the women don't find you handsome they should at least find you handy. - Red Green

At my age erections are like cops...there's never one around when you need it!

Never miss a good chance to shut up. - Will Rogers

Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Idaho passes Agricultural gag bill - 2/28/2014 11:42:10 PM   
bachus


Posts: 31
Joined: 1/27/2014
Status: offline
That this can happen in the US is simply incredible.

(in reply to igor2003)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Idaho passes Agricultural gag bill - 2/28/2014 11:46:23 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
It's part of the new trend of redefining freedom of the press ... slippery slope ignorance and all of that.

ETA: Idaho is obviously following the lead of the FCC and they have determined that future stories about Idaho agriculture aren't true.

Reap what you sow.





< Message edited by DaddySatyr -- 3/1/2014 12:00:23 AM >


_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to bachus)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Idaho passes Agricultural gag bill - 3/1/2014 12:18:36 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

It's part of the new trend of redefining freedom of the press. Slippery slope ignorance and all of that.

Reap what you sow.




Whose doing the sowing here ? Not the people, the politicians. Can't have a bill of rights and fascism at the same time. This should be struck down. But then the FDA and the USDA have extraordinary powers when it comes to putting the small farmer out of business anyway. They can come on your property, take your livestock out and kill it. ALL without a warrant or probable cause. They can force the 'farmers market' off the streets without crippling approvals. Your food is dangerous you know...having no pesticides, herbicides and antibiotics to 'protect' the consumer, I guess.

Can't compete with those who buy our laws and congress. Many regulations are to eliminate small farmers and their competition anyway.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Idaho passes Agricultural gag bill - 3/1/2014 1:10:06 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Whose doing the sowing here ? Not the people, the politicians. Can't have a bill of rights and fascism at the same time. This should be struck down. But then the FDA and the USDA have extraordinary powers when it comes to putting the small farmer out of business anyway. They can come on your property, take your livestock out and kill it. ALL without a warrant or probable cause. They can force the 'farmers market' off the streets without crippling approvals. Your food is dangerous you know...having no pesticides, herbicides and antibiotics to 'protect' the consumer, I guess.

Can't compete with those who buy our laws and congress. Many regulations are to eliminate small farmers and their competition anyway.



Ya know, MrRodgers, you and I almost never agree but I appreciate your ability to be just snarky enough to not offer offense or belittle me, while you're belittling what I'm saying. You're one of the few lefties on this board with whom I'll still engage.

Having said that, I think either my meaning wasn't clear or you misunderstood it.

I was referencing the people who are so supportive of the beginning of the erosion of our free press; the people so vehemently in support of proposed FCC "monitoring" of news organizations.

There are certain things that (I feel) should always be "sacred cows"; that can never be abrogated or infringed in any way.

When a portion of people are so encouraged to pull at the first thread of that "sweater", we can see the beginning of the whole thing unraveling.

I don't think the timing of this law is any coincidence since the Idaho law-makers can point to the rising sentiment of "someone" needing to be in control of veracity, vis-à-vis the press in our country.

People can't say: "Someone needs to reign in these news organizations that don't tell the truth" and then, complain when some government, somewhere decides that they're going to fill the void.





_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Idaho passes Agricultural gag bill - 3/1/2014 3:15:01 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Whose doing the sowing here ? Not the people, the politicians. Can't have a bill of rights and fascism at the same time. This should be struck down. But then the FDA and the USDA have extraordinary powers when it comes to putting the small farmer out of business anyway. They can come on your property, take your livestock out and kill it. ALL without a warrant or probable cause. They can force the 'farmers market' off the streets without crippling approvals. Your food is dangerous you know...having no pesticides, herbicides and antibiotics to 'protect' the consumer, I guess.

Can't compete with those who buy our laws and congress. Many regulations are to eliminate small farmers and their competition anyway.



Ya know, MrRodgers, you and I almost never agree but I appreciate your ability to be just snarky enough to not offer offense or belittle me, while you're belittling what I'm saying. You're one of the few lefties on this board with whom I'll still engage.

Having said that, I think either my meaning wasn't clear or you misunderstood it.

I was referencing the people who are so supportive of the beginning of the erosion of our free press; the people so vehemently in support of proposed FCC "monitoring" of news organizations.

There are certain things that (I feel) should always be "sacred cows"; that can never be abrogated or infringed in any way.

When a portion of people are so encouraged to pull at the first thread of that "sweater", we can see the beginning of the whole thing unraveling.

I don't think the timing of this law is any coincidence since the Idaho law-makers can point to the rising sentiment of "someone" needing to be in control of veracity, vis-à-vis the press in our country.

People can't say: "Someone needs to reign in these news organizations that don't tell the truth" and then, complain when some government, somewhere decides that they're going to fill the void.



Thanx for recognizing that I don't go after the messenger here or in a source, nor do I ever try to belittle people at all. I however do not otherwise know what you mean by 'you reap what you sow' and feel as though that in a very general sense and in a very powerful way, whether it is attempts to go after a free press or free trade, that there is a sort of new regime in this country and one of what I need to call...local fascism.

This is in the interest of govt. corruption, shielding it and corporate America. I also believe however, that when the chips are down, dems tend to favor labor and the people in general while the repubs tend to favor capital and the investor class, much to my disappointment.

This shows up in these anti-gay laws, laws against the free press and even 3rd class misdemeanors against small farmers on a permit violation that in any other case would render merely a citation instead causes 40-50 man swat teams to spend 5-6- hours taking all of your fresh farm produce, animal stock and dairy products and to 'enforce' laws purchased at the behest of the richest influences in govt.

A new culture of street-level Neo-Nazism is growing in the US and just wonder if the people aren't already being further intimidated into obedience and the bill of rights is already lost.

BTW, I am an independent conservative and am objective...calling [it] as I see it and in many ways...Obama is playing ball and is Bush III for lack of a better or let's say...a more accurate comparison.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Idaho passes Agricultural gag bill - 3/1/2014 5:34:23 AM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
The deplorable conditions found as animals are converted into food are neither isolated nor new.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Jungle

The Jungle is a 1906 book written by the American journalist and novelist Upton Sinclair (1878–1968).[1] Sinclair wrote the novel to portray the lives of immigrants in the United States in Chicago and similar industrialized cities. Many readers were most concerned with his exposure of health violations and unsanitary practices in the American meatpacking industry during the early 20th century, based on an investigation he did for a socialist newspaper.

The book depicts working class poverty, the absence of social programs, harsh and unpleasant living and working conditions, and a hopelessness among many workers. These elements are contrasted with the deeply rooted corruption of people in power. A review by the writer Jack London called it, "the Uncle Tom's Cabin of wage slavery."[2]

Sinclair was considered a muckraker, or journalist who exposed corruption in government and business.[3] He first published the novel in serial form in 1905 in the socialist newspaper, Appeal to Reason, between February 25, 1905, and November 4, 1905. In 1904, Sinclair had spent seven weeks gathering information while working incognito in the meatpacking plants of the Chicago stockyards for the newspaper.

http://www.theodore-roosevelt.com/images/research/txtspeeches/963.pdf

[I couldn't pick a section of this 11 page report and suggest it be read in its entirety.]

(in reply to igor2003)
Profile   Post #: 7
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Idaho passes Agricultural gag bill Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078