theshytype
Posts: 1600
Status: offline
|
I still view it as a flaw, an original unintended one. Something that wasn't intended but works so no reason to change it. Sort of accepting the flaw and taking the "bad" with the good. So no, it's not really a flaw now. I consider this primal urge and Homosexuality to be unrelated. The "flaw" I'm referring to is one where we just want to have sex because it's pleasurable, not for making babies. The urge to hump something isn't telling us what to hump. Something else is. But, is a good example behind the urges being primal. Homosexuality hasn't had an effect on any species' survival, that I'm aware of, so this primal urge still works. No need to change anything. I agree nature usually finds a way to tweak and breed out threats to a species' survival and since homosexuality hasn't threatened population, no need to tweak. I'm also coming from the opinion that the present human is largely flawed so much so that nature has been trying to eradicate, or at the very least reduce the population, for years. Unfortunately, it seems, we're worse than cockroaches. To be honest, I'm not a strong believer in mother nature wanting to tweak anything in humans except, perhaps, dumb them down a bit or removing the sexual urges.
|