BamaD
Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DominantWoman65 The latest reports are now saying there were possibly a few more who boarded with false documentation and military radar is suggesting that the aircraft turned from its course, all without any contact with ATC. The reason I discussed it with Bama is because terrorism is a part of life, if Bama wanted to discuss the dangers of flying, based on an aircrafts maintenance system then that's what his post would have centered around. I don't know how many times I have to repeat myself in saying that whatever security check they ran failed, allowing we don't know who to get in that aircraft with two stolen passports. I have respect for Mr Curtis and the products that Boeing his former company produces, however, Mr. Curtis is not a accident/incident investigator, he is PR. Perhaps I come from a different mindset than you, but I will comment on your "rogue" or oops we forgot to tell anyone that we were deploying missiles and if by some "accident" a SAM hit that aircraft at 35,000 ft, and a government or their military maintains silence, it should be looked on as an act of aggression. Even if it was a freak massive equipment failure your concerns about the lack of Interpol checks is valid. While waiting to find the wreck and inspecting it that should be fixed post haste. Even if totally unrelated to this incident it is a disaster waiting to happen. I must admit to a typo in the title. It should have read Another terrorist strike against China? I am totally open to other explanations.
_____________________________
Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.
|