RE: Another terror attack against China.

RE: Another terror attack against China. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

MercTech -> RE: Another terror attack against China. (3/14/2014 11:35:43 AM)
Interesting... automatic data transmission shows the plane flew for hours after it disappeared. http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/03/13/2218221/engine-data-reveals-that-flight-370-flew-on-for-hours-after-it-disappeared http://online.wsj.com/news/article_email/SB10001424052702304914904579434653903086282-lMyQjAxMTA0MDEwMzExNDMyWj

Rule -> RE: Another terror attack against China. (3/14/2014 11:41:27 AM)
FR In my opinion the airplane most likely suffered a catastrophic accident. The see there appears to be shallow. They will find that plane.

BamaD -> RE: Another terror attack against China. (3/14/2014 11:58:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MercTech Interesting... automatic data transmission shows the plane flew for hours after it disappeared. http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/03/13/2218221/engine-data-reveals-that-flight-370-flew-on-for-hours-after-it-disappeared http://online.wsj.com/news/article_email/SB10001424052702304914904579434653903086282-lMyQjAxMTA0MDEwMzExNDMyWj Too bad the transmissions didn't include location, but of course that wasn't what they were checking for.

Musicmystery -> RE: Another terror attack against China. (3/14/2014 12:07:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DominantWoman65 I'm still trying to figure out why names weren't run through the international data base. If that procedure would have been followed the outcome could have been a bit different. Oddly, China doesn't openly share all her information with us publicly. There's likely much to this story we aren't going to know.

Rule -> RE: Another terror attack against China. (3/14/2014 1:52:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MercTech Interesting... automatic data transmission shows the plane flew for hours after it disappeared. http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/03/13/2218221/engine-data-reveals-that-flight-370-flew-on-for-hours-after-it-disappeared quote: Those snippets are compiled and transmitted in 30-minute increments ... neither Boeing nor Rolls-Royce received data past 1:07am (the flight initially disappeared off radar at 1:30am). So it appears that the plane disappeared between 1:30 and 1:37 am.

MercTech -> RE: Another terror attack against China. (3/14/2014 4:12:55 PM)
I wish they had mentioned what time zone the data was documented in. One can hope that someone looked at that when figuring out what time the data ceased compared to the time when communication ceased. quote: Throughout the roughly four hours after the jet dropped from civilian radar screens, these people said, the link operated in a kind of standby mode and sought to establish contact with a satellite or satellites. These transmissions did not include data, they said, but the periodic contacts indicate to investigators that the plane was still intact and believed to be flying.

Rule -> RE: Another terror attack against China. (3/14/2014 5:47:26 PM)
FR It is well known that the USA has undersea listening posts just about everywhere. Maybe the navy heard the plane splash down?

deathtothepixies -> RE: Another terror attack against China. (3/14/2014 6:10:32 PM)
[/quote] I must admit to a typo in the title. It should have read Another terrorist strike against China? [/quote] I think it should have read... Another right wing knee jerk reaction in the hope of creating fear and panic. In other news a right wing bible bashing gun toting misogynist from a generic southern state has apparently shot and killed common sense. Common sense, quite old and not in possession of all the facts was seen knocking on the man's door and asking for a bit of sanity. However the man confused the rolled up copy of the New Scientist in his hand for a lethal weapon and shot him 4 times. An uninformed witness was quoted as saying " he looked very threatening and very un-American. I can't be sure as the porch light wasn't on but I think he had some Skittles. Anyway he should have known better than to knock on someone's door round these parts" The police were on the scene in minutes but were clearly way too late. Neighbourhood watch officials have asked everyone to shoot at people parked in cars just to be on the safe side

Rule -> RE: Another terror attack against China. (3/14/2014 6:19:28 PM)
According to CCN the Wall Street Journal has asserted that it is increasingly credible that someone took the plane off course.

BamaD -> RE: Another terror attack against China. (3/14/2014 6:23:18 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Rule According to CCN the Wall Street Journal has asserted that it is increasingly credible that someone took the plane off course. According to dead pixie knowing that makes you a paranoid right winger just trying to stir up trouble.

deathtothepixies -> RE: Another terror attack against China. (3/14/2014 6:28:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: Rule According to CCN the Wall Street Journal has asserted that it is increasingly credible that someone took the plane off course. According to dead pixie knowing that makes you a paranoid right winger just trying to stir up trouble. It may turn out that the plane was blown up by terrorists but we still don't know shit for sure. "increasingly credible" is a long fucking way from fact. "Another terror attack against China" hours after the plane disappeared is a really really fucking long way from a fact in most sane peoples mind

Lucylastic -> RE: Another terror attack against China. (3/14/2014 6:32:41 PM)
quote: "Another terror attack against China" hours after the plane disappeared is a really really fucking long way from a fact in most sane peoples mind" Hit the nail on the head:) especially considering the rest of the thread.

DominantWoman65 -> RE: Another terror attack against China. (3/14/2014 7:02:37 PM)
Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't the OP correct the title of the thread and pose it as a question?

BamaD -> RE: Another terror attack against China. (3/14/2014 7:06:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DominantWoman65 Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't the OP correct the title of the thread and pose it as a question? Yes, that seems to be what set off Deathtopixies tirade.

Lucylastic -> RE: Another terror attack against China.??????? (3/14/2014 7:12:47 PM)
I asked this on post 12....he didnt respond to me... maybe because he has me on ignore, I dunno, he had the chance to change it, and didnt quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Im sorry Bama but your sentance From CNN.com without comment so I don't bias the reading. Why is the headline "Another terror attack against China"???

DominantWoman65 -> RE: Another terror attack against China. (3/14/2014 7:14:06 PM)
I thought I may have misunderstood something.

DominantWoman65 -> RE: Another terror attack against China. (3/14/2014 7:16:36 PM)
I took it as an open discussion that anyone could participate in and discuss the probability of such an act occurring.

Lucylastic -> RE: Another terror attack against China. (3/14/2014 7:25:35 PM)
You participated sincerely and responsibly :) in my nsho.for what it is worth I hope you stay around and continue with thought provoking posts.. Ive enjoyed them immensely.

BamaD -> RE: Another terror attack against China. (3/14/2014 7:35:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DominantWoman65 I took it as an open discussion that anyone could participate in and discuss the probability of such an act occurring. So did I.

DominantWoman65 -> RE: Another terror attack against China. (3/14/2014 7:41:08 PM)
Thank you. I plan on sticking around. I guess what irks me a tad is that I can disagree civily with someone on one thread, but I don't drag that bias into other threads to pollute them. We all have different opinions and that's what makes the discussions interesting.

Page: << < prev 2 3 4 [5] 6 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875