RE: I was blocked (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


MissToYouRedux -> RE: I was blocked (3/15/2014 9:11:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: johnnymars

... But I will not send same text anymore, even though writing the same thing differently about me every time is a lot of time wasted.



It's not time wasted. It's making the effort to show that you have particular interest in *her*, if indeed you do... And echoing others, it wouldn't hurt to craft a message with some focus on *her*. [:D]




MAINEiacMISTRESS -> RE: I was blocked (3/15/2014 9:41:10 AM)

Womenv on here, whether submissive or Dominant, get HUNDREDS of letters from eager men. If you are just throwing out spam letters (which is what a mass mailing like you have done is called) why should anyone respond?

I personally love the letters that start with something like, "Wow, I saw your photo and you are the most beautiful woman on CollarMe!" Seeing as how I currently (and have always) only have a picture of a MAP on My profile, this sort of letter is PROOF he's just spamming everyone he can without actually VIEWING profiles, though perhaps wording each letter just differently enough to slip through the spam filters.

Remember, whether you are dominant or submissive, as a MAN you have HUNDREDS of other men to compete with, so STEP IT UP and show you are willing to invest the effort. OTHERS ARE, and those men are the ones who get noticed.





DarkSteven -> RE: I was blocked (3/15/2014 9:49:27 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MissToYouRedux

quote:

ORIGINAL: johnnymars

... But I will not send same text anymore, even though writing the same thing differently about me every time is a lot of time wasted.



It's not time wasted. It's making the effort to show that you have particular interest in *her*, if indeed you do... And echoing others, it wouldn't hurt to craft a message with some focus on *her*. [:D]


Exactly.

OP, you seem fixated on the idea of sending out thousands of mass letters to women and not "wasting time". Why? You're tripping the spam filter, not meeting women, and wasting your time.




DesFIP -> RE: I was blocked (3/15/2014 11:13:51 AM)

Not to mention that very few women are interested in helping you cheat on your wife.
Fix your marriage or end it.

Don't expect someone else to commit solely to you when you aren't available to do the same.

You spending Thanksgiving with her or your wife?
Christmas?
Can she call you at midnight if her car breaks down for a lift?
You going to be her date at her office party? She coming to yours?

You don't have much to offer someone in exchange for what you want.




LafayetteLady -> RE: I was blocked (3/15/2014 3:38:24 PM)

The way I read his profile, he isn't married but looking for married women.. of course that could be because he is married.

Regardless, I mentioned about that in my earlier post, although it was conveniently ignored by the OP.




Apocalypso -> RE: I was blocked (3/15/2014 4:34:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: johnnymars
But I will not send same text anymore, even though writing the same thing differently about me every time is a lot of time wasted.


A lot of time? How long does it take you to write a couple of paragraphs?

As a start, try and pass the Turing Test at least.




DesFIP -> RE: I was blocked (3/15/2014 4:55:08 PM)

Second line says he's in a sexless marriage.




dcnovice -> RE: I was blocked (3/15/2014 6:01:34 PM)

quote:

How long does it take you to write a couple of paragraphs?

Hours.




MistressDarkArt -> RE: I was blocked (3/16/2014 1:07:50 AM)

John, besides the married part, another thing that may be tripping you up is this part of your profile:

I have released my current sub <snip> In any case, she will allow my potential subs to speak with her and she will give me a reference.

I think what would be more useful here is that a new potential partner be able to speak to your wife about your involvement. She's entitled to a face-to-face discussion with your other half about boundaries, limits, expectations and safety so that all are fully informed and consenting.

There are a few regular posters on this board who are married with outside partners. Virtually all of them insist their spouses be kept in the loop; full disclosure. It would be a rare (and unsavory) female who would accept being a piece on the side without your wife's full knowledge and consent. For that matter, an above-board married sub-partner would insist on extending the same requirements to you and her husband.

That said, sub women are in great demand. They can pick and choose the best of the A-game best. They don't need to bother with messy spousal attachments from the dominant's end.

So if your wife is cool with all this and willing to negotiate with your outside partner(s), say so in your profile. If she's not, apologize to her for your mistake marrying someone who was not sexually compatible, compensate her as the law requires, and get the eff out. YOU got yourself into this situation; it is not unique or compelling in any way. Quit d*cking around and make it right so everyone involved has the chance to find their bliss in an honest, straightforward fashion.




TeaseMeToTears -> RE: I was blocked (3/21/2014 2:38:40 PM)

This is some mega BS. I have been extremely thoughtful in my messages.




MistressDarkArt -> RE: I was blocked (3/21/2014 5:13:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP

Second line says he's in a sexless marriage.


Viewing today, he has removed EVERY reference to being married, though he still states he doesn't want a wife or girlfriend (gee, ya think? Being married and all?) I find anyone's blatant omission of this important information to be so tasteless and deceitful.




GoddessManko -> RE: I was blocked (3/21/2014 5:43:45 PM)

Everything about the OP would scream to me as a hypothetical submissive woman as "desperate psycho". Not going to go into the reasons why but I'd be surprised if he fared well since instead of actually reading profiles and finding unique qualities he can compliment these prospective women about, he chose instead to skim pictures and ages and send lazy generic messages.
I don't see anyone leaping at the opportunity even if the "married" part was omitted. If they do, it would be a catfish, or very, very short lived (not past a coffee date).
He seems to be trying to find a way to have an extramarital affair than a consensually kinky partner. Has cuckolding as one of his kinks yet omitted his wife, is a Dom and is seeking ALL types of partners/couples, LOL. I don't think he even knows what the terms mean.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875