quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Yes, on 3/11 but a day later as the OP referred to if you had read it...on 3/12 Brennan said this:

"American CIA Director John Brennan said on 12 March that a full-scale invasion of Russian troops onto the territory of Ukraine will begin after the referendum in Crimea. The Ukrainian political analyst Pavlo Nuss shares this viewpoint: “On 17-18 March, regular troops of the Russian Federation will begin an invasion of Ukraine,” he says. This expert believes the invasion will begin simultaneously from the south and east of the country.

“They will begin the occupation of Kherson and Mykolaiv from Crimea, attempting to take control of the shoreline of the Dnieper. They will attempt simultaneously to enter the territory of Mariupol and Berdyansk to establish control over the Azov region plus the Sea of Azov. This will happen, if we consider the invader’s ‘maritime interest’ scenario. The mobilization of the RF army at the borders of our motherland testifies that Russia is prepared for any scenario of military operations,” Nuss explains.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Yes, on 3/11 but a day later as the OP referred to if you had read it...on 3/12 Brennan said this:

"American CIA Director John Brennan said on 12 March that a full-scale invasion of Russian troops onto the territory of Ukraine will begin after the referendum in Crimea. The Ukrainian political analyst Pavlo Nuss shares this viewpoint: “On 17-18 March, regular troops of the Russian Federation will begin an invasion of Ukraine,” he says. This expert believes the invasion will begin simultaneously from the south and east of the country.

“They will begin the occupation of Kherson and Mykolaiv from Crimea, attempting to take control of the shoreline of the Dnieper. They will attempt simultaneously to enter the territory of Mariupol and Berdyansk to establish control over the Azov region plus the Sea of Azov. This will happen, if we consider the invader’s ‘maritime interest’ scenario. The mobilization of the RF army at the borders of our motherland testifies that Russia is prepared for any scenario of military operations,” Nuss explains.

Here

quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessManko

It really isn't cool to pretend the issue with Ukraine is something new, especially when people are only now paying attention to what Putin has been doing since 2001. And it was BUSH who signed over all the oil deals to Putin, then accused Putin of waging oil wars, LOL...anyway...
Ask the Chechens about Vladmir Putin.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessManko

It really isn't cool to pretend the issue with Ukraine is something new, especially when people are only now paying attention to what Putin has been doing since 2001. And it was BUSH who signed over all the oil deals to Putin, then accused Putin of waging oil wars, LOL...anyway...
Ask the Chechens about Vladmir Putin.

Actually a warm water seaport has been a Russian goal since the at least time of
Peter the Great, this is just the most recent incarnation.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Yes, on 3/11 but a day later as the OP referred to if you had read it...on 3/12 Brennan said this:

"American CIA Director John Brennan said on 12 March that a full-scale invasion of Russian troops onto the territory of Ukraine will begin after the referendum in Crimea. The Ukrainian political analyst Pavlo Nuss shares this viewpoint: “On 17-18 March, regular troops of the Russian Federation will begin an invasion of Ukraine,” he says. This expert believes the invasion will begin simultaneously from the south and east of the country.

“They will begin the occupation of Kherson and Mykolaiv from Crimea, attempting to take control of the shoreline of the Dnieper. They will attempt simultaneously to enter the territory of Mariupol and Berdyansk to establish control over the Azov region plus the Sea of Azov. This will happen, if we consider the invader’s ‘maritime interest’ scenario. The mobilization of the RF army at the borders of our motherland testifies that Russia is prepared for any scenario of military operations,” Nuss explains.

Here

I did say credible. I note the Op hasnt got back to the subject either.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

"Then I'll expect Monday to be a very interesting day. I'll be watching for the Tatar response.

(Glad I've got some popcorn.) "


Well we know how the republicans handles putin when it was their turn......


[image]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/08/09/article-0-1B3600D9000005DC-652_634x471.jpg[/image]


No evidence to suggest that the wouldn`t fondle putin`s balls the same way now.....


To the normal folks.....the cons are trying to turn weak-assed bush`s brown nosing of pootie-putin`s butt into leadership while claiming President Obama is a pussy for not calling up troops....[8|] ....is something that can`t be helped.....


The President,working solidly with our European allies has instituted the harshest penalties against the ruskies..... since the the cold war....


Freezing the money and seizing the flats and town-houses owned and used by putin`s inner circle as well as a few russo-Ukrains leaders.They can`t travel to them either,in London or here.....as promised.


I`m think`n maybe putin might be the separatists republican`s savior and hero too......


You could all go to russia with snowden.....

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

You've said nothing to refute the facts. Your opinion on a the creditability of a news organization means zero, and is uninteresting. You have no facts, no argument, so what it there worth discussing?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
Bush was a moron when it came to Putin.

quote:


...11 people are denied travel permits to the US. Assets frozen.