Phydeaux -> RE: Ukraine (3/21/2014 1:15:15 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: cloudboy quote:
**To piss of the Putin administration, or just all Russians in general? Good point. Here are the response ideas from an insider, ALEXEY A. NAVALNY, who has intimate, detailed knowledge of the regime: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/20/opinion/how-to-punish-putin.html?ref=international&_r=0 As you insinuate, any effective "punishment" needs to be accurately directed. You, me, and the next American don't really know what to do at all. Funny how "chicken hawk" and "cafeteria-style 'libertarian'" Phydeaux wants Big Government for wars and foreign interventions but not to rebuild the USA at home or to help it's own citizens. Does he really think that culturally ill-literate, Pentagon - State Department - CIA interventions will do anyone any good? If so, can he cite any recent positive examples of this to counterbalance the disasters of waste, lost lives, and tortured victims in Afghanistan and Iraq? Asking him to get involved personally in a cause he want others to undertake is not a taunt. He's just not Laurence of Arabia or Pat Tillman, not by a long shot. Real Americans actually get involved in the causes they believe by going abroad and joining up. Got news for you buddy. I volunteered for the military. How 'bout you? I reject the assertion of "torture". I know liberals like to assert waterboarding is torture. But then liberals like to sanitize a lot of words - "choice" for "murder", for example. But, here's the definition of torture: tor·ture [tawr-cher] Show IPA noun 1.the act of inflicting excruciating pain, as punishment or revenge, as a means of getting a confession or information, or for sheer cruelty. 2. a method of inflicting such pain. 3.Often, tortures. the pain or suffering caused or undergone. 4.extreme anguish of body or mind; agony. 5.a cause of severe pain or anguish. Do I think our soldiers are illiterate? No. Seems you do. Seems you also think John Kerry is illiterate. Now while I think he's a poodle, I concede his ability to read. Do you often support illiterate democrats for public office? By your assertion that "real americans get involved in causes by going abroad and signing up". From this I must conclude therefore that you are either not an american or you don't believe in any causes - because otherwise you'd go abroad and sign up. Now the logical fallacies of that position are actually rather mindboggling. You still fundamentally don't, indeed, understand my position. I don't want Big Government for anything. As for interventions abroad with positive outcomes.. How many would you like? Kosovo, Sudan, Israel / Egypt (Camp David Peace accords. Israel in general. Grenada. Nicaraugua. SEATO. CENTO. NATO. Liberia. Poland, East Germany, the baltic states. The Marshall plan. The American imposed constitution in Japan. Panama. The Lousianna Purchase. The Gadsen Purchase. Seward's Folly. Not to mention the Korean War. WWII. WWI. Spanish American war..... Do you really think *every* intervention should be successful? Do you think that a reasonable standard?
|
|
|
|