BamaD -> RE: Another shooting of an unarmed teen... (3/20/2014 6:21:28 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961 quote:
ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote:
ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD quote:
ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote:
ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote:
ORIGINAL: thishereboi I read that he heard noises, I didn't see anything that implied those sounds were of his daughter having sex. Maybe you could provide a link since you seem to have read about it. I didnt read about it, I stated the obvious. The girl didnt seem to be in a state of distress, the boy was in her bedroom after being invited..... You work it out, it isnt difficult. No it isn't difficult at all. I was going by what I read and nothing I read indicated that the noises he heard were sexual. You and the other poster seem to be not only assuming that they were, but that the dad also should have known that. Personally I would rather stick to the facts and leave it at that. Her complete lack of distress was, I must assume, the reason she lied to her father about knowing the boy. Maybe that is what tongue tied the boy as well. I hadn't thought about it and no one has mentioned it, but my nephew brought up a good point last night. Why didn't the kid say anything when the girl denied knowing him. He said the first words out of his mouth would have been along the lines of 'why are you lying, we go to school together" and start listing names and events to help back his story. Everything about this story is fucked up and I am not sure we will ever know what really happened. Right now, all we have is daddies story, we havent heard a word from the daughter have we??? daddys story, will likely be far different to daughters. again facts not in evidence, just subjective viewing. according to daddy there was an argument, o maybe the boy DID try to call her out...maybe the boys response pissed daddy off so much the boy didnt go for a gun, maybe he called his daughter a whore...and daddy shot him in the head. OF course the real story will not come out, not even a close approximation of it. because the victim is dead cant tell his side of the story Uh, according to the authorities statements to the press: The daughter admitted after the fact that 1) she invited the boy over, and 2) she lied about knowing him, and 3) confirmed the series of events up to the boy getting shot. So what "story" does she have to tell, other than "I was stupid and got my boyfriend killed." ? And you ignored the implication that the kid, and only the kid, would tell the truth.
|
|
|
|