Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Literally LOL'ed!


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Literally LOL'ed! Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/18/2014 3:31:30 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phoenixpower
Thanks for sharing DS....its giving a good giggle for my start of the day...


A laugh at the beginning of the day was why I posted it. I was just glad I wasn't drinking something when I first saw it.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Phoenixpower)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/18/2014 3:42:32 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri



Ok, so you actually did see the humor in it? Good. That was the point of it.

You didn't comment about the Unions using temp workers to hold the signs. Why not?


i didnt read it, I already said that, so I didnt comment on it

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/18/2014 5:14:11 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
because they have to?
I dunno you ask em
making a stand against shitty employers only works if you can leave?


Who is making them work there? No one has to work for any specific employer. I don't know if it's different up North, but here in the States, no one is forcing anyone to work at a particular business.


The conservative fallacy is on display here folks.....wait for it....

Tell me DesideriScuri, can you name.....ALL....the companies operating in that area that have good managers that are not assholes to their employees? When labor and management are having problems, its usually due to egos clashing against one and another.

Lucy brings up several good points, one of them being 'what is the job availability in that area?'. There might be a large swing in customer service jobs in that area, but those people are neither trained nor desire that sort of job. Its not about being picking, its about finding 'as good if not better' of a fit. Companies will overlook experience and skills, if the personalities fit together well between management and labor.

However, DS, you are also wrong on workers not being forced to work. There are plenty of contracts that sounded good in the beginning, but weeks or months in, and it sounds like crap. If they leave, there is usually a hefty financial cost attached to the decision. No one that I know of can look into the future with perfect accuracy and determine if their future job or contract will be a good one. But your stating the opposite more or less.


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/18/2014 5:41:27 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Ok, so you actually did see the humor in it? Good. That was the point of it.
You didn't comment about the Unions using temp workers to hold the signs. Why not?

i didnt read it, I already said that, so I didnt comment on it


You didn't read Johnny's post about it?


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/18/2014 5:49:34 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

No offense, Lucy, but I don't see how picking one contractor over another is fucking anyone over just because they weren't part of a union.

not past that..no

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/18/2014 6:04:21 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
because they have to?
I dunno you ask em
making a stand against shitty employers only works if you can leave?

Who is making them work there? No one has to work for any specific employer. I don't know if it's different up North, but here in the States, no one is forcing anyone to work at a particular business.

The conservative fallacy is on display here folks.....wait for it....
Tell me DesideriScuri, can you name.....ALL....the companies operating in that area that have good managers that are not assholes to their employees? When labor and management are having problems, its usually due to egos clashing against one and another.
Lucy brings up several good points, one of them being 'what is the job availability in that area?'. There might be a large swing in customer service jobs in that area, but those people are neither trained nor desire that sort of job. Its not about being picking, its about finding 'as good if not better' of a fit. Companies will overlook experience and skills, if the personalities fit together well between management and labor.
However, DS, you are also wrong on workers not being forced to work. There are plenty of contracts that sounded good in the beginning, but weeks or months in, and it sounds like crap. If they leave, there is usually a hefty financial cost attached to the decision. No one that I know of can look into the future with perfect accuracy and determine if their future job or contract will be a good one. But your stating the opposite more or less.


Actually, Joether, you're simply toeing the party line there (as usual).

I've been alive for decades. I've been working for decades. I have had good jobs, pretty much every time. I've probably only had two jobs that, in the end, were not good jobs. I left the first one to get a better job that actually had something to do with my degree. The second one I left was to increase my education. At no point in time did anyone have the responsibility to give me a job, or to pay me some certain level (except my first two "real" jobs which were minimum wage jobs to start).

No one is forced to work at a specific place. Everyone chooses to work where they work. Ya'all might think that you have to be able to afford X, Y, and Z, or else you aren't getting paid enough. That's not true. There are almost always ways to reduce X, Y and Z to get within your budget. I know people who skipped cable so they could use those resources in areas they felt were more important. Just because you want X, Y, and Z doesn't mean your employer has to pay you enough to have them.

You want a better job? Go get one. Or, better yet, go create one. And, the best solution would be to start your own company and offer the wages/benefits you would want to get paid. I'm sure your openings will be easy to fill, and, you'll also be able to take the better employees from your competition.

But, they don't do that. They bitch, piss, moan, whine, and whinge (Lucy's word... I don't really know exactly what it means ) because it's easier.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/18/2014 6:08:41 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
when was the last time you started a company????


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/18/2014 6:52:39 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
when was the last time you started a company????


Never have. And, I've never really bitched and whined about not getting paid enough, even when I didn't feel I was getting paid what I was worth. I got better jobs.




_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/18/2014 7:23:07 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
So
you have someone in a union job or out it doesnt matter... works his 40 a week, has a wife and three kids, a mortgage, 2 cars, cos they work separate shifts, hes been doing the job for fifteen years, pays lousy conditions are lousy, price of everything seems to double he has no savings, debt up to his eyeballs, cant afford time off to get a better education, has an idea for a business, but doesnt want to get deeper in debt.
How (without blaming him for not planning better) does he go about it? during the setup, the legal issues, getting a website, paying a lawyer, a company, suppliers, customers?

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/18/2014 8:22:45 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
No one is forced to work at a specific place. Everyone chooses to work where they work. Ya'all might think that you have to be able to afford X, Y, and Z, or else you aren't getting paid enough. That's not true. There are almost always ways to reduce X, Y and Z to get within your budget. I know people who skipped cable so they could use those resources in areas they felt were more important. Just because you want X, Y, and Z doesn't mean your employer has to pay you enough to have them.


What you're saying is true, but isn't it also just as true from the other side as well? No one is forcing the employer to pay lousy wages. The employer could pay higher wages and do without X, Y, and Z himself, couldn't he/she? And if he/she doesn't do that, isn't it the employees' right to call him/her a cheap bastard?

Sure, they can quit their job, but they also have the right to carry a sign and call out cheapskates and skinflints in the business community - the same people who are undermining our economy and making America non-productive (which has been a very dangerous attitude all these decades considering the recent shift in world tensions).

quote:


You want a better job? Go get one. Or, better yet, go create one. And, the best solution would be to start your own company and offer the wages/benefits you would want to get paid. I'm sure your openings will be easy to fill, and, you'll also be able to take the better employees from your competition.

But, they don't do that. They bitch, piss, moan, whine, and whinge (Lucy's word... I don't really know exactly what it means ) because it's easier.


Everybody has something about which they bitch, piss, whine, and "whinge" (which means "the arm of a bird"). Next time I'm in England, I'll ask for a bottle of "wing" and see what they bring me.

Seriously, though, I'll echo some of what you say here. I think if someone is truly unhappy in their job, they should quit and find a better job. There may not be any better jobs in a given area though. So, it's easier said than done.

Some of what you address may also be more related to our culture rather than anything directly to do with the economic or political system. A strong cultural phenomenon is to equate one's value and standing in society to one's income bracket, so when an employer pays such low wages to its workers, it sends the message that "you're not worth very much to us." That's probably very true, and an employer likely cares very little about how his/her workers feel or whether they earn enough to feed their families.

And perhaps that's all perfectly legal and within the tenets of the capitalist belief system. But then again, we're also part of a community, as are the business people who decide what their employees are worth. If they choose to be bad citizens and gut/exploit the local, state, or national economy for their own greedy purposes, then why should I be concerned about their "pissing, moaning, and whining" about governmental interference in the free market, higher taxes, tariffs, price controls, environmental laws, labor laws, or just about anything else they whine about.

But it's all just a pretense to cover up their greed, since it's all about their money, their profits, and what's in their wallet - all because they think they deserve to have enough money to get X, Y, and Z. And if any of that is threatened in any way, they go into "gloom and doom" mode, warning of enormous consequences, that the sky may fall in and that devil socialism will infect everyone's soul and turn us all into zombies.

I'm not really a bleeding heart, nor am I really into redistribution of wealth for its own sake. I don't really see it as a matter of an individual worker going out and finding a better job or getting better skills. Sure, that should definitely be encouraged, but I think we also need to look at this from the big picture and what is best for the overall good of the country right now.

The main problem I find with the free market/laissez faire position is that it argues too much from an abstract, theoretical standpoint, as if in a vacuum, disconnected and insulated from the political realities we face in this country and in the world at large. I find it to be too limited and short-sighted. I can understand all the arguments you're making, and that, from a certain point of view, they're perfectly valid and logical.

My view is that politics doesn't exist to adhere to an economic philosophy. Overall, I believe the goal should to promote harmony and civil order in society, not just give the rich free rein to screw the poor just to prove a point about our devotion to capitalism. As a nation, I think we should have more common sense than that, and not be so ideologically driven. It's not about being a bleeding heart or even about social justice (although that would be nice). I think it's more a matter of practical necessity than anything else. In the end, I think the needs of the country outweigh the needs of a few cheapskates and greedheads who mock the very ideals they pretend to uphold.

I admire your convictions and I respect your principles, but I think that we've discussed this before, and even you've said that we don't have the kind of political/economic system which would be your ideal. I can see that, maybe, if your ideals were implemented fairly, honestly, ethically, and consistently all throughout society, it could conceivably work. Of course, that can be said with anything.

But we're not really dealing with a systemic issue, are we? It's more a matter of the fabric of the nation right now and the prevailing culture of despair, apathy, malaise, greed, laziness, pride, hate, corruption. I think that our problems go beyond any kind of "quick fix" of the economic system (which won't be "quick" in any case). And yeah, there might be a lot of pissing, moaning, and whining along the way...and we can only hope that it doesn't escalate beyond that.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/18/2014 9:03:04 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
So
you have someone in a union job or out it doesnt matter... works his 40 a week, has a wife and three kids, a mortgage, 2 cars, cos they work separate shifts, hes been doing the job for fifteen years, pays lousy conditions are lousy, price of everything seems to double he has no savings, debt up to his eyeballs, cant afford time off to get a better education, has an idea for a business, but doesnt want to get deeper in debt.
How (without blaming him for not planning better) does he go about it? during the setup, the legal issues, getting a website, paying a lawyer, a company, suppliers, customers?


Gee, I don't know, start small, maybe? Start small and build up to the other stuff?

Nah. That doesn't work.

So, what you're saying is that this guy, this gal, this couple isn't going to put in the extraordinary effort it usually takes to get a business off the ground, but they'll bitch and moan that they aren't treated properly by the ones who have put that effort in.

That sounds perfectly shitty for the business owner.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/18/2014 9:07:06 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
No one is forced to work at a specific place. Everyone chooses to work where they work. Ya'all might think that you have to be able to afford X, Y, and Z, or else you aren't getting paid enough. That's not true. There are almost always ways to reduce X, Y and Z to get within your budget. I know people who skipped cable so they could use those resources in areas they felt were more important. Just because you want X, Y, and Z doesn't mean your employer has to pay you enough to have them.

What you're saying is true, but isn't it also just as true from the other side as well? No one is forcing the employer to pay lousy wages. The employer could pay higher wages and do without X, Y, and Z himself, couldn't he/she? And if he/she doesn't do that, isn't it the employees' right to call him/her a cheap bastard?


The difference is, it's the employer's business. That's the difference. You want to call the shots? Start the business. When it's your business, and your capital that's on the line, you get to make the rules (to an extent).


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/18/2014 9:32:29 AM   
MercTech


Posts: 3706
Joined: 7/4/2006
Status: offline
All too often a union becomes the crooks you have to pay off in order to keep your job.
All the benefits of your dues go to select cronies of the BM (Business Manager or Bowel Movement as applicable). And the dues portion to the national goes to support political candidates you wouldn't piss on if they were on fire.

The biggest difference I've seen in union vs non-union shops has been union shops have higher pay and a hostile work environment and the non-union shops have lower pay but friendlier working conditions.

If I see a union picket; I want to know what the issues are not knee jerk decide the management must be wrong. Sometimes it is just a BM posturing or going for an under the table bribe.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/18/2014 10:05:58 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
Well that evil business shouldn't have hired a non-union company. Everyone knows if you are not willing to join the union, you don't deserve to work. What the fuck is wrong with them.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/18/2014 10:21:16 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

LOL I kinda figured, its ok lots of people assume I will submit...
they soon find out the rules for me dont mesh with their fantasy
sowwy but certainly worth a try

It's those fucking pics of yours girl...the power of suggestion(s)

< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 3/18/2014 10:26:06 AM >

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/18/2014 10:22:45 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
because they have to?
I dunno you ask em
making a stand against shitty employers only works if you can leave?


Who is making them work there? No one has to work for any specific employer. I don't know if it's different up North, but here in the States, no one is forcing anyone to work at a particular business.


I agree, fuck 'em...let them eat cake.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/18/2014 10:25:34 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
not always but as usualyou have little regard for what people actually HAVE To deal with
the crapitalist corps are all good tho eh


Who said they were "all good?"

What makes you think I have no regard for what people actually HAVE to deal with? Am I somehow insulated from the facts of life? Me? The guy almost drowning in debt? The guy that has spent extended periods of time unemployed? They guy that had to go to a Food Bank so he'd have food for his kids to eat? The guy that feels damn lucky to have a job at this point in time (which wasn't the case 4 months ago)?

Yeah. I have no idea what other people HAVE to deal with.

Spare me, Lucy. My only complaint was that I wasn't getting an opportunity to interview for positions I was qualified for. And, I even acknowledge that it was more my own doing than anything else.

Yeah. I don't have a clue.

I think you do need an OTK from RottenJohnny.


Hey, you've got it. Millions of people all over the country soon in the streets competing for food, jobs and the paper needed to buy them. Did anyone say FEMA camos ?

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/18/2014 10:34:17 AM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

Well that evil business shouldn't have hired a non-union company. Everyone knows if you are not willing to join the union, you don't deserve to work. What the fuck is wrong with them.

Spoken like a true Detroiter.

(just kidding, boi)

_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/18/2014 10:44:11 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
So
you have someone in a union job or out it doesnt matter... works his 40 a week, has a wife and three kids, a mortgage, 2 cars, cos they work separate shifts, hes been doing the job for fifteen years, pays lousy conditions are lousy, price of everything seems to double he has no savings, debt up to his eyeballs, cant afford time off to get a better education, has an idea for a business, but doesnt want to get deeper in debt.
How (without blaming him for not planning better) does he go about it? during the setup, the legal issues, getting a website, paying a lawyer, a company, suppliers, customers?


Gee, I don't know, start small, maybe? Start small and build up to the other stuff?

How small? how legal? build up with what a customer a year? a customer a month? take a class or apply for school to get the business management out of the way...good idea? do you know how long it takes to get a business up to par when you have no money behind you?? If you are going to get an education, and take out a student loan for how many years and get further into debt? cos starting your business is a sure fire way to prosperity isnt it?
say one of the kids get sick, spouse has to quit a job to look after them, because her employer is non union and threatened him or her with the boot if they miss more time, so theres more pressure, more stress less money, less time, less concentration?
Your car explodes but the spouse needs a car to get the kids to school and hospital appointments or god forbid YOU get sick or have an accident.
Putting everything into an education and a business is not easy, and yeah I do know what its like




Nah. That doesn't work.

So, what you're saying is that this guy, this gal, this couple isn't going to put in the extraordinary effort it usually takes to get a business off the ground, but they'll bitch and moan that they aren't treated properly by the ones who have put that effort in.

Now please show me where I said anything like that???? quit playing strawman

That sounds perfectly shitty for the business owner.




_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Literally LOL'ed! - 3/18/2014 10:58:00 AM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

So
you have someone in a union job or out it doesnt matter... works his 40 a week, has a wife and three kids, a mortgage, 2 cars, cos they work separate shifts, hes been doing the job for fifteen years, pays lousy conditions are lousy, price of everything seems to double he has no savings, debt up to his eyeballs, cant afford time off to get a better education, has an idea for a business, but doesnt want to get deeper in debt.
How (without blaming him for not planning better) does he go about it? during the setup, the legal issues, getting a website, paying a lawyer, a company, suppliers, customers?

Depends on the type of business. I've been self-employed since I was 18. All it took was doing a little homework on business ownership and $10 every 5 years to keep my business registered. I didn't need a lawyer, I don't have a website, my suppliers ship to my home, and I can write off a portion of my costs of living directly off my taxes. Getting customers takes ground pounding and some actual ambition but it can be done.

_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Literally LOL'ed! Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094